An Analysis Of The San Andreas Fault/Earthquake

1713 Words4 Pages

The topics of conversation within this transcript jumped from Kiona’s vacation (seen in lines 2 to 25), to Florida and California’s water issues (seen in line 27 to 28), back to Kiona’s vacation (seen in line 29 to 32) and finished off with the San Andreas Fault/Earthquakes (seen in line 32 to 56). The initial topic of conversation was suggested by Corina (seen in line 2) in order to get the conversation started. There was no topic dropped due to embarrassment, however; there was a moment mentioned before in this analysis in which we went back to a topic. Most because at the time and based on facial expressions the participant Barbi, she wasn’t paying attention to the conversation that was happening right next to her. There also was no topic …show more content…

This can be seen in lines 33 to 39 and lines 42 to 55, where the act was to inform the audience about San Andrea’s Fault and earthquake plans. The utterance which produced it was on line 32 where Kiona states her concern on the recent talk of the town involving the pending earthquake commonly known to Californians as “the big one”. According to Bonvillain, there are “several kinds of speech acts—greeting, partings, apologies, thanks, compliments—are frequently expressed by highly predictable and stereotyped linguistic routines. They combine verbal material and social messages in patterns, expressive of cultural values and sensitive to interactional context” (Bonvillain 2014, 86). There are routine exchanges within this conversation which occurred outside of the participant’s conversation due to the setting of the conversation. Since the participants ' were at work where they use routines which “typically occur sequences of exchanges between participants minimally consisting of an utterance by the first speaker followed by a return or acknowledgment by the second speaker” (Bonvillain 2014, 86). This is seen in lines 15 to 17 where an outside speaker states “Thank you” and the response by two participants who responded with “your welcome” and “no problem”. Within this conversation there was repetition of …show more content…

According to Bonvillain hedge words are used to “have the effect of creating uncertainty about the speaker’s claims, uncertainty that she herself expresses about her knowledge. Use of such devices blunts the intended statement, undermines the speaker’s competence, and anticipates the possibility that she may be contradicted by the addressee” (Bonvillain 2014, 24). Hedge words can be seen in line 33, when Corina uses the words “well” and “supposedly;” therefore showing the uncertainty to express her knowledge of the severity of earthquakes. Another gender associated feature seen in the transcript for women is ending their turn with a question which can be seen in lines 7, 12, 21, and 29. Throughout the conversation Kiona and Corina had a face to face posture and maintained eye contact throughout the conversation while Barbi maintained a sideways posture and avoided eye contact until she spoke to Kiona during lines 29, 34, 39, 41 and 51. Having a face to face posture and maintaining eye contact is associated with females while a sideways posture and avoiding eye contact is associated with males; and although Corina maintained a face to face posture and maintained eye contact with Kiona, she maintained a sideways posture and avoided eye contact with Barbi. Another gender associated feature is supportive/competitive

Open Document