Contrasting Ideas in Cormac McCarthy 's Child of God

846 Words2 Pages

Can someone be two contrasting ideas at once? It seems possible for Cormac McCarthy as through his novella Child of God, he considers this question with the use of the protagonist, Lester Ballard. (). (). Ballard’s animalistic descriptions and amazing feats juxtapose his non-humanness against his super-human capabilities. Immediately, Ballard is illustrated as hostile towards others in the Sevier community as the “half crazy” looking man does not “give a fuck who’s present” even when “ladies [are] present” (7, 15). His attitude towards the townspeople may stem from the lack of a family. Since his father “killed hisself” and his “mother had run off”, Ballard never had a real family (21). Instead, the “simian” attempts to recreate a normal family life with the use of stuffed animals (20). To acquire his companions, Ballard goes to a fair and carefully analyzes the prizes. The obsession to find the right assortment is prevalent as he collects a dozen fish, studies the stuffed toys, and remains persistent in winning them after winning multiple animals (62-64). When he returns to his living space, the animals are placed in a way that gives Ballard comfort, as if they are personified to be the family that he never had (67). Lester cherishes his new kinfolk dearly as he retrieves them from his burning home (105). Ballard’s distance from the norm expresses his need for a familiar bond through alternative means. Ballard cares for his firearm just as much as his stuffed animals. Throughout the novel, other characters continuously witness the gun wrapped around him. Since he has “had that rifle from when he was just almost a boy”, it could represent more than a deadly weapon, but a family figure that decides to stay with him (57). Ballard... ... middle of paper ... ... his new home (106-107, 184). At times, nature does not care for Ballard as he is swallowed into a “submerged creek bank” (156). Somehow, he finds a way to survive even though “he could not swim” and when he reaches out of the bank, he gibbered while sounded “like the mutterings of a band of sympathetic apes” (156-159). Ballard’s talent to stand in the face of horror is genuine, unlike others who try to imitate the ability. One of the narrators admits to fighting with an ape, on the assumption that “[the ape] was goin to do nothin much” (59). It is to the narrator’s surprise that the ape fights back and “he jump[s] right on top of my head and cram[s] his foot in my mouth and [would] like to [tear] my jaw off” (60). Comparative to the rest of Sevier County, Ballard appears to be a very resilient being, an accomplishment that others have tried, but failed to achieve.

Open Document