The Consequences for Poppies if De-Layering is Allowed To Take Place

780 Words2 Pages

Business Studies – Organisational Structure

Evaluate the consequences for Poppies if de-layering is allowed to take place (16 Marks)

De-layering is the process of removing levels from within a business. The primary reason for doing this is to reduce costs, however there can be many consequences if de-layering takes place.

Some positives could be that in the long term removing a layer from a business should lead to reduced costs. The reason for this is that you will no longer have that layer of your business on your payroll meaning you will not need to pay them a wage any more. The flip side of this is that in the short term you may need to pay the workers of the layer you removed a redundancy pay.

Removing a layer of a business can also be seen as a method of making your business smaller. This is the opposite of what Tim wanted to do with his plans for expansion. Conversely, de-layering may lead to Tim needing to hire new staff for new job purposes. This would be expansion and would also give Tim the chance to hire “enough staff of the right quality”, something he was previously worried about. However as I have said, de-layering should in the long term reduce costs and so increase chances of finance towards expansion.

Another effect of de-layering is that it increases the decision making process and decreases the channels of communication. This means that as there are less people to go through and thusly less people to confirm what needs to happen with. Because of this efficiency should be improved within the business when orders are given.

The negative aspects must also be considered. Arguably one of these is that employees would be given more responsibility and more authority, something that Tim specifically wanted to av...

... middle of paper ...

...en by either the managers of the outlets, or by retraining the outlet staff assistants. This would however incur a cost as you would have to pay redundancies, but it would be a lot smaller than if you were to remove the buyer’s layer. Also it may incur the cost of having to retrain either the managers or the outlet staff assistants on how to do the role of the supervisor and they may demand more pay.

Overall I feel that it would be best to de-layer the business and to do so by removing the supervisor’s layer. This is because it would incur a smaller cost financially to remove this layer and lead to more pro’s such as a quicker decision making process and hopefully a more efficient business. Though I would also suggest to Tim that he allow smaller decisions such as whether an outlet is allowed to re order new stock, be down to the managers of the individual outlets.

More about The Consequences for Poppies if De-Layering is Allowed To Take Place

Open Document