Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
conflict resolution strategies
conflict resolution strategies
conflict resolution strategies
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: conflict resolution strategies
Folger, Poole and Stutman (2013) state that a conflict is “the interaction of interdependent people who perceive incompatibility and the possibility of interference from others as a result of this incompatibility” (pg. 4). Jill and Dan definitely seem to have a conflict throughout the case study. To start off their conflict, it doesn’t seem that Jill and Dan were the best at interacting with each other. It came across that Dan was just throwing Jill’s request to the side to forget about it. Along with their interaction not being great, their communication between them was not clear on what each of them needed. Jill never stated exactly when she needed her update and Dan didn’t tell her when he would have the time to formally talk to her about …show more content…
A very common emotion when dealing with conflict is anger, which can be accompanied by feelings of contempt, irritation, and exasperation (Folger, Poole, & Stutman, 2013, p. 47). There is a studied and established link between the emotion of anger and the construction of possible emotional barriers which can prevent potential compromises within conflict (Halperin & Pliskin, 2015, p. 123). This barrier is evident in Jill when she does not receive the response she desires, and instead of reengaging with Dan she talks with the trustee about her issue. A barrier may have also been created with Dan when Jill came to him in person after having already received a request. This lead to a lack of communication and a lack of willingness to compromise to meet Jill’s …show more content…
109). Jill initially displays a competing style by not acknowledging Dan’s conflicting priorities and offers to find her own supplier. Pruitt, Rubin and Kim (1994) found “Contending is a “softer” form of competing”. (as cited in Folger, Poole, & Stutman, 2013, p. 115) Contending provides some flexibility in the situation as long as the individual’s goals are not compromised. It is difficult with the limited history of the prior interactions between Dan and Jill to determine if this was a way to “soften” her style by offering to help as to preserve the relationship or if it was more threatening to indicate she will do what it takes to get what she needs. Dan also demonstrates a competing style by stating his priorities and not offering alternatives or working to agree on an acceptable timeline as to satisfy individual needs. The lack of communication, accommodation and collaboration between Jill and Dan prevents resolution of the
The styles ask us what individual styles did each party use. The negotiation asks us are the parties able to negotiate with one another? Why or why not (Wilmot & Hocker, 2011)? As we know the case study is about the newlyweds disagreeing about domestic issues. The conflict builds out of control and shows an example of what miscommunication or poor communication styles leads to. Monica states “I have a real craving for pizza tonight. Or maybe we could go to the movies. Or maybe both!” (Davis, p. 1). Her statement was sort of the trigger for the conflict. Between Monica and Enrique’s relationship Enrique is the man of the house and Monica is the woman of the house. They both depots their roles in the house as far as what a typical household should look like. Enrique works really hard to provide for his new family and Monica works just as hard and does the house work. Their gender dictates their assigned roles within the house and it shows within their conflict. This in a way is important because it is the cause of the ongoing conflict and why it escalates. Enrique stays away from household chores meanwhile Monica submits and does them. At one point in the case study Enrique even states, “Ok. Ok. I’ll go see Jack for awhile, while you clean the house” (Davis, p.
Keep in mind that conflict can be a good thing by providing a time of reflection for what is truly the best decision. If using professional communication techniques, a compromise can be made.
Walmart can be studied using structure functional theory and social conflict theories. Social functional theory is the relationships among parts of society and how these parts are functional(have beneficial consequences) or dysfunctional (have negative consequences. Most Americans today love to shop at Walmart because they continue to give consumers the best prices on over 120,000 products and are one stop shopping.
Interpersonal conflict is very common with many relationships. It occurs when two people can not meet in the middle or agree on a discussion. Cooperation is key to maintaining a healthy debate. More frequently; when dealing with members of your own family, issues arise that include conflict and resolution. During this process our true conflict management style appears “out of thin air”. (Steve A. Beebe, 2008, p. 191).
Many people enjoy working or participating in a group or team, but when a group of people work together chances are that conflicts will occur. Hazleton describes conflict as the discrepancy between what is the perceived reality and what is seen as ideal (2007). “We enter into conflicts reluctantly, cautiously, angrily, nervously, confidently- and emerge from them battered, exhausted, sad, satisfied, triumphant. And still many of us underestimate or overlook the merits of conflict- the opportunity conflict offers every time it occurs” (Schilling, nd.). Conflict does not have to lead to a hostile environment or to broken relationships. Conflict if resolved effectively can lead to a positive experience for everyone involved. First, there must be an understanding of the reasons why conflicts occur. The conflict must be approached with an open mind. Using specific strategies can lead to a successful resolution for all parties involved. The Thomas-Kilmann Conflict Mode Instrument states “there are five general approaches to dealing with conflict. The five approaches are avoidance, accommodation, competition, compromise, and collaboration. Conflict resolution is situational and no one approach provides the best or right approach for all circumstances” (Thomas, 2000).
A group can only be called a team if the members are actively working together toward a common goal. A team must have the capability to set goals, make decisions, solve problems, and share responsibilities. For a team to be successful, trust must be earned between its members by being consistent and reliable (Temme & Katzel, 2005). When more than one person is working on a particular task, inconsistent views or opinions commonly arise. People come from different backgrounds and live through different life experiences therefore, even when working towards a common goal, they will not always see eye to eye. Major conflict that is not dealt with can devastate a team or organization (Make Conflict Work, 2008). In some situations, conflict can be more constructive than destructive. Recognizing the difference between conflict that is constructive to the team and conflict that is destructive to the team is important. Trying to prevent the conflict is not always the best way to manage conflict when working within a team setting. Understanding conflict, what causes it, and how to resolve conflict effectively, should consume full concentration.
workplace include greater total resources, greater knowledge band and a greater source of ideas. However, these advantages can also bring on conflict within teams and the entire workplace. Varney (1989) reported that conflict remained the number one problem within a large company. This was after several attempts were made to train management in conflict resolutions and procedures. However, the conflict remained. The conflict possibly remains because the managers and leaders did not pay attention to the seriousness of the issue. In order to maintain an effective team, leaders and team members must know and be proactive in the conflict resolution techniques and procedures.
Conflict seems to inevitable when trying to merge two companies. Conflict is described as the “Process which begins when one party perceives that the other has frustrated or is about to frustrate, some concern of his” (Kumar, 2009). Synergon’s CEO uses a “take no prisoners” approach and would fire most of the management team within 12 months of taking over a company using an approach they call neutron bombing. In cases where both companies are successful like in the case of Synergon Capital and Beauchamp you add even more conflict. The managers of Beauchamp are used to operating in a positive way that has produced profits for the company and you add Nick Cunningham a manager of Synergon who is used to restructure management in newly acquired poorly ran
Conflict theory are perspective in sociology psychology that accentuate the social, political, or material inequality of a social group, that analysis the broad socio-political system, or that weaken from structural functionalism and ideological conservatism. With conflict theory, you will see tensions, status, and power are unevenly distributed between groups in society, which these conflicts become the purpose of social change. Conflict theory usually arise due to competition and limited resource that is feed by domination and power, rather than consensus and conformity. This is seen a lot on macro level. As a social worker, you will see and use conflict theory throughout your professional.
According to McShane and Von Glinow, conflict is “a process in which one party perceives that his or her interests are being opposed or negatively affected by another party” (328). The Conflict Process Model begins with the different sources of conflict; these sources lead one or more parties to perceive that a conflict exists. These perceptions interact with emotions and manifest themselves in the behavior towards other parties. The arrows in the figure illustrate the series of conflict episodes that cycle into conflict escalation (McShane and Von Glinow 331-332).
Conflict is unavoidable and connected to a world where different ideas and opinions are challenged. Negative conflict occurs when voices are not expressed appropriately, discussions are not in control or different parties reject moving forward with a solution. There is difficulty resolving disagreements because there are multiple reactions to disputes. However, a positive conflict supports debates without a destructive outcome. They improve communication, introduce principles that are important to others, and reduce chaos. On the other hand, the approach that a person uses to address conflict dictates the outcome they receive. Methods for resolving conflict include avoiding the problem, smoothing out a situation, competing against the ideas
Conflict management model is propounded effective when the result of conflict is productive or acceptable for all the parties involved. The main motive of any conflict management model is to reduce the impact of conflict on negative note and guide parties towards agreement and strong relationship. This study is to analyze the effectiveness of Rahim’s Meta or Dual concern model for conflict management.
that may result in a struggle for power or position. Conflict management, therefore, can be
Conflict exists in every organization as a result of incompatible needs, goals, and objectives of two people while aligning to the overall business requirements. Though disagreement is linked with negative impact, the approach has healthy considerations (Leung, 2008). For instance, some conflicts create an avenue for the exchange of ideas and creativity to meet the set organizational purposes. However, damaging disagreement in organizations results in employee dissatisfaction, turnover, and poor services and reduced productivity. The paper establishes different types of interpersonal conflict and key resolution strategies used to address the problem. Human resource managers need to have the capacity to identify different levels of conflicts and the best methods to negate them.
Billy play as (Vince Vaughn) and Nick play as (Owen Wilson) they are a couple of old school salesmen. Loses their jobs because the company where they used to work is now sold because the company is losing market for the cellular. They were trying to find jobs but couldn’t because they did not have enough skills. Billy gets them a chance to work at Google but they first have to undergo a long internship and they find themselves teamed with a group of young, tech-savvy who are younger than