The law dealing with contempt in the Caribbean jurisdictions is generally found to be at common law, except in Guyana, where there is a Contempt of Court Act. Common law offences are established by the courts over the years where there lies no legislation, that is, they are derived from case law. According to Crone (2002), contempt of court refers to the improper interference with the administration of justice. Its origin lies within the rule of law, that the court must be free to decide on the matters before it, unhindered by outside influence. Publication of contempt can be either a criminal or civil contempt. At common law, there are three offences of criminal contempt. This includes interfering with pending or imminent court proceedings, contempt in the face of court and scandalizing the court. The criminal contempt offence committed by Speech Owt is interfering with pending or imminent court proceedings. It is concerned with the likel...
... middle of paper ...
Contempt of court & contempt of parliament. (n.d.). Unpublished raw data, Caribbean Institute
of Media and Communications, University of the West Indies, Mona. Kingston, Jamaica.
Crone, T. (2002). Law and the media. (4th ed.). Woburn, MA: Focal Press.
Daley, V. (2014). Law of contempt [Online forum content]. Retrieved on March 12, 2014, from
POUS report. (2008). Forum on contempt of court and media publicity. London, England.
Press Association of Jamaica Code of ethics. (2005). Retrieved March 12, 2014, from
Disclosure: A Jamaican protocol. (n.d.). Retrieved March 13, 2014, from
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- Franz Kafka’s novel “The Trial” examines a totalitarian system of justice that appears stems from human attempts to attain justice. An external, secret court exists outside of the public eye but holds the authority to carry out trials and judgements. When a startled Josef K is charged with some undisclosed act, Kafka examines the corrupt and absurd nature of the judiciary. As corruption runs through the system, it becomes normative and systemic in nature. Moreover, secrecy threatens the accused right to a fair trial, while symbols illustrate the totality of the justice system.... [tags: Jury, Judge, Law, The Trial]
1099 words (3.1 pages)
- No doubt you've probably heard the term 'innocent until proven guilty' once or twice in your life. Although this concept isn't directly stated in the constitution, it is absolutely indispensable to our justice system; but with the rise of communication through technology in recent years, it is not always a right that's guaranteed. Every American in the United States is entitled to a fair trial, but with the ever increasing prevalence of social media in every day life are our trials really fair.... [tags: Persuasive Speech]
593 words (1.7 pages)
- The ‘long-standing’ legal principle under which commercial corporations could acquire a remedy against a defamatory act should, in the view of Lord Scott, have been left untouched. In support of this view, the new Defamation Act, which asks for corporations to prove ‘serious financial loss’ in order for a claim to be brought before the court, does appear to restrict corporations’ abilities to defend their reputation, which is of clear value to them. In addition, it has been suggested that the new act contravenes Article 1 of the Protocol to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, with respect to corporations.... [tags: politics, fair trial]
1764 words (5 pages)
- A crime is an act punishable by the state that causes harm or discontent against a community or individual. Crime is known to be “an action or omission that constitutes an offense that may be prosecuted by the state and is punishable by law”1. Crime can be classified through a variety of elements which violate the rights of a community at large. Acts of crime are punishable upon proof of guilt that are presented in the court of law. Consequently, criminal law is the law which defines these crimes and may aid or establish their subsequent punishments.... [tags: Media]
1419 words (4.1 pages)
- The jury plays a crucial role in the courts of trial. They are an integral part in the Australian justice system. The jury system brings ordinary people into the courts everyday to judge whether a case is guilty or innocent. The role of the jury varies, depending on the different cases. In Australia, the court is ran by an adversary system. In this system “..individual litigants play a central part, initiating court action and largely determining the issues in dispute” (Ellis 2013, p. 133). In this essay I will be discussing the role of the jury system and how some believe the jury is one of the most important institutions in ensuring that Australia has an effective legal system, while other... [tags: jury systems, proceedings and judgements]
1507 words (4.3 pages)
- ... First, attorneys are valuable due to the well-rounded skills they possess. Each attorney has their own special study, such as practicing business law or dealing with human rights. No matter what type of trial a victim may undergo, there is a proper attorney to fit their case. Besides having their own specialties, each attorney retains superior work habits. They demonstrate dependability, through paying attention to detail, and work long hours to thoroughly research each case. They work to seek justice for each client.... [tags: Jury, Court, Law, Judge]
911 words (2.6 pages)
- Context In March, 1918, French teacher, feminist and socialist activist, Hélène Brion was trialed for treason and defeatism in regards to the spread of her propaganda items throughout France, that challenged the Allies war efforts in World war 1(Michallat, W. 2013). The primary source to be analysed in this essay is the statement Brion delivered at her trial for treason. When the war began on August 1st 1914, the women of France put aside their fight for women’s suffrage, that had been intensifying over the years leading up to this time, to assume a role assisting the war efforts for their nation.... [tags: World War I, World War II, Women's suffrage]
1520 words (4.3 pages)
- Criminal Trial Process Paper Introduction: In Canada, our criminal trial process is based around an adversarial system. What this means is that the disputants are represented by professionals in the field of law. These professionals are called lawyers. The lawyers work so that the truth of the trial is brought forward and justice is served for the greater community. In the adversarial system it is believed that the search for truth is best served by the parties themselves, through their lawyers and not through the judge.... [tags: essays research papers]
2017 words (5.8 pages)
- The Concept of Citizenship Citizens are members of a certain state and are formally recognised by that state. The concept of citizenship is therefore legalistic. Citizens are individuals who have a legal status within the state. They are granted certain rights and in return must perform certain duties. The range and balance between the rights granted and duties they are supposed to perform, vary from state to state and time to time. For example, in war time the rights and obligations of a citizen would be different that of a citizen in peace time.... [tags: Papers]
1023 words (2.9 pages)
- Creative Commons - America Needs Fair Use Licenses It’s likely happened to you before, you turn on your radio, or favorite music video network and begin listening to a song by some hot new pop starlet, hip-hop superstar, or aging rocker. The beat is catchy, inviting, and oddly familiar, almost too familiar in fact. You may think, “Didn’t David Bowie, or, hmm, wasn’t it that guy from Queen that played this riff in like ten years ago. Who is this Vanilla Ice guy and why is he rapping over it?” If you were old enough to remember Under Pressure and subsequently were listening Ice Ice Baby in 1990 (likely while cruising in your Mustang 5.0 convertible on your way to a Milli Vanilli... [tags: Argumentative Persuasive Argument Essays]
1719 words (4.9 pages)