Competitive Analysis of Motorola Company Background Motorola, Inc. is a Fortune 100 global communications leader that provides seamless mobility products and solutions across broadband, embedded systems and wireless networks. Motorola was founded in 1928 by Paul and Joseph Galvin under the name Galvin Manufacturing Corporation. The company started out by producing battery eliminators that allowed battery operated radios to run on household current. The first Motorola brand car radio was launched in the 1930aê¡?s. In 1947 the company changed its name and became Motorola, Inc. The company expanded in the 1950aê¡?s and 1960aê¡?s and became semiconductor producers for other manufacturers. Motorola also became a global company in the 1960aê¡?s. In the 1970aê¡?s Motorola introduced the companyaê¡?s first microprocessor and a prototype for the worldaê¡?s first commercial portable phone. In the 1980aê¡?s and 1990aê¡?s Motorola provided the worldaê¡?s first computerized engine control, invented the Six Sigma quality improvement process, launched the MicroTac which was then the smallest and lightest cellular phone on the market. In the 21st century Motorola has provided the worldaê¡?s first GPRS cellular system, the worldaê¡?s first wireless cables modem gateway, and the MOTORAZR V3 cellular phone. Motorola continues to pursue mergers, acquisitions and alliances in an effort to grow and continue to be profitable and be a global leader in the industry. Some of the major mobile devices products for Motorola are mobile phones, accessories, Bluetooth devices, IDEN technology, portable energy systems and two-way radios. Major products for Motorolaaê¡?s government and enterprise mobility solutions are biometrics, integrated information management, computer-aided dispatch systems and records management systems. Other major products are Motorolaaê¡?s networks and home networking solutions. Motorola has three business units which are mobile devices, network and enterprise, and connected home solutions. During the fiscal year 2006, mobile devices generated 66.1% of Motorolaaê¡?s total revenues, followed by network and enterprise generating 26.2% of the total revenues, and connected home solutions generating 7.7% of total revenues. Motorolaaê¡?s revenues for the 2006 fiscal year were $42,879 million. The U.S. which is the companyaê¡?s largest market accounted fro 43.9% of the total revenues. Forces and Trends Trend: WiMax aê¡á" Nellie Stewart Description of trend: In the industry environment, Worldwide Interoperability for Microwave Access (WiMax) is very important to Motorola. WiMax is an Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) standard designated 802.16e-2005 (mobile wire-less). With WiMax cell phones will no longer be tied to cellular networks. WiMax has the potential to replace a number of existing telecommunications infrastructures (WiMax, 2007). WiMax has the potential of replacing cellular networks, copper wire networks used by telephone companies, and the coaxial cable infrastructure use by cable TV while offering Internet Service Provider (ISP) services. Relevance of trend: Broadband wireless access (BWA) and in particular WiMax is being
You would not buy a home, car or other large purchases without researching what product offered you the most for your money. The same is true when investing in a company. Investors do avid research on multiple companies to find what company matches the investors' criteria. In this paper Team C will research both AT&T and Verizon's financial documents. Team C will compare selected ratios, cash flow and make recommendations how both companies can manage cash flow for the future.
I recommend a strong buy on Cisco’s stock with a target price of $32.50, a 50% upside from its current price. Cisco has a solid competitive advantage, because there are not many strong competitors in the market. The other firms show a higher P/E ratio than Cisco because they have a lower market share. The company shows a constant growth. Cisco markets its products globally with the highest market shares than its competitors. The main risks for Cisco are worsening of economic conditions or exchange rates. The company has a good growth in sales, which will lead higher profits. The company also gives out an annualized dividend to its shareholders every year.
The commotion lead to investors and brand patriots alike, wondering how an internet giant like Google can integrate with and run a hardware company that had been profusely bleeding cash and had begun the downward spiral over the last few quarters. A quick answer was that Google could now manufacture hardware in large quantities. Motorola was once a major mobile manufacturer. Looking at the OEM market share data, Motorola, at the time, held a market share of 13.7%. This had plummeted from the previous year's share of 20%.
The Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Corporation (3M) was founded in 1902. It reported sales revenues of $16.7 billion during the year 2000. These revenues came from 3M's six business divisions: industrial; transportation, graphics, and safety; healthcare; consumer and office; electro and communications; and specialty materials. All business divisions were profitable in 2000. The same year, the company made more than 60,000 products and about $5.6 billion sales came from products that had been introduced during the prior four years and another $1.5 billion came from products introduced during 2000. Annually, more than 75,000 employees worked to create more than 500 new products. The company was recognized for its vertical organizational structure, with businesses established by technologies and markets. It was one of the most admired corporations in America and was awarded the National Medal for Technology, the U.S. government's top award for innovation, in 1995.
With the pharmaceutical industry constantly changing, it makes it very important for a company to analyze the macro environment. The first force is political; right now that pharmaceutical industry is greatly affected by politicians due to changes in health care structure, healthcare platforms, and partnerships with certain pharmaceutical companies. Within the next three to five years as politicians rotate we can foresee the political force being an even greater impact on the industry. The next force is economic. For the now we feel that the pharmaceutical industry is greatly affected by the economic force as people have more spendable income and will be more likely to purchase brand name drugs. As income dwindles, some poor individuals may be unable to purchase even generic drugs. Within the next three to five years since we are coming out of a recession, we will see consumer spending increase and the demand for the highest quality of medicines increase. The economic force will greatly impact the pharmaceutical industry for some time. The next force of the macro environment is the social force. The social force greatly affects the industry since we have begun to focus on preventative health care and detection recently. Moving forward we expect the trend of preventative health care and our tendency to change our health habits will prompt the pharmaceutical industry to deliver new and innovative products. The fourth force is technological; right now the pharmaceutical industry is greatly impacted by changes in technology, and will continue to be affected for years to come. The next force, ecological, somewhat affects the industry. Events like natural disasters, plagues, and other mass causalities can greatly affect the pharmaceutic...
It was on Friday, November 5, 1999, that Judge Thomas Penfield Jackson had declared Microsoft a monopoly. So, it’s not a question of whether Microsoft is a monopoly, but more so a question of whether it should still be considered a monopoly today. I don’t think that Microsoft should currently be considered a monopoly, but I definitely do believe that it once was. The reason Microsoft should no longer be considered a monopoly is that there are several operating software that now compete with Microsoft. Two of the biggest competitors are Apples OS and Google Chrome's OS. Operating software’s like Apples’ OS and Google Chrome’s OS are close substitutes for Windows. One of the criteria for a firm to be a monopoly is that there are no close substitutes, “A firm is a monopoly if it is the sole seller of its product and if its product does not have any close substitutes (Mankiw 290).” And this
Apple Inc. is a multinational company, based in America, which innovate, develop and sell personal computer its software named Macintosh and various other products like the iPhone and the iPad. In 1976, Steve Jobs started the apple era and the business has grown rapidly to one of todays’ iconic inventors of consumer electronics. Despite the company operates in a wide field of products, Apple is handling every of their products as a separate business unit, but with a similar and recognisable design. This report will focus on Apples last invention, the iPad, and analysis its position within the market and future perspectives (Apple Inc., 2012).
Toyota Motor Corporation is a Japan based company, whose headquarters are located in Aichi Prefecture. The company was founded by Kiichiri Toyoda in 1937. Currently the company’s CEO is Akio Toyoda. Toyota is basically into cars and it is one of the top players in the world in this industry. Toyota also owns two other brands namely Lexus and Scion, which gives the company a lot of advantage over it’s other competitors. Toyota manufactures sedans, saloons, suvs, muvs, pick-up trucks and buses. During the year 2013 Toyota had approximately 333,498 employees, who were working globally. In March 2013, Toyota was ranked as the thirteenth biggest organization globally in terms of its revenue. In the following table we can see the financial report of Toyota Motor Corporation in the year 2013-
A duopoly, only two competitors in the market, is the extreme basic form of an oligopoly, few competitors in a market. Duopolists engage in a non-cooperative game because firms are not allowed legally by many states to sit together and form a cartel where they can agree on certain prices, quantities, strategies, etc… Non-cooperative games can take the form of cournot, both firms move together and choose their quantities simultaneously, or stackelberg, the leader firm moves first and sets its output quantity and then the follower firm moves second based on the first firm's move. Given the assumption that each firm is able to have a full information of the other, they both realize the market power of each respective firm. Deviating from the plan/quantities will lead both firms to cheat and hence, the race to the bottom begins. This can be illustrated by showing the profit function of both firms by using Dixit (1979) equation:
Cell phone manufacturers and service providers are at the core of the cell phone industry. These corporations are integral from their research and development endeavors to interactions with the consumer and the marketing of new products. The companies that control such factors of cellular phones are very numerous, so it is difficult to address all the cell phone manufacturers and service providers. However, we have focused largely on only the most significant cellular companies namely in the U.S. marketplace, although many have global ties. Collectively, companies around the world have the same goals in mind – to create desirable cutting-edge technology and to increase consumer satisfaction with hopes of generating sales, and thus profits.
AT&T Wireless is the leading wireless telecommunications provider in the US market. The US wireless market constitutes over 243M wireless subscribers. This represents a market penetration of 81%. The wireless market sells mobility of voice and data (video-media, download content and internet access).
Microsoft is currently the largest company in the computer industry. With a market capitalization of $291 billion, Microsoft has built an empire by dominating software sales for personal computers. Stock growth over the past 25 years has increased by more than 30,000%. However, Microsoft’s growth has substantially decreased since the market collapse of 2001(Niemond 25 April 2007).
This report is mainly based on the case study Emerging Nokia, using the frameworks and concepts we have learned to analyze the case. This report is divided into 5 parts, first is the summary of the case, the second part is about the competition Nokia faced, the third part is the factors that contributed to the success of Nokia, then the challenges Nokia may face in China and the recommendations to them and the last part is the conclusion of the report.
By the end of 2003, Nokia was the clear market leader in the mobile phone industry in terms of sales and profitability. It was ahead of giant companies like Motorola, Ericsson, Siemens, Samsung, and other worthy competitors. Since the early 1990s, Nokia's Strategic Intent was to build distinctive competency in product innovation, rapid response, and global brand management. Its strategic intent required rapid growth in the core businesses of mobile phones and telecommunications networks. This goal was achieved by Nokia's development of new products and expansion into new markets. In order to become the global leader as it is today, the company had overcome numerous challenges and obstacles over the last decade.
Samsung’s cost advantage is clearly visible from the comparison of costs (and their elements) that were borne by the company and its competitors in 2003 (Tab. 3): Samsung’s overall cost was 24 per cent lower than the weighted average cost of the other four producers; two most significant elements of the cost structure, i.e. raw materials and labour, were 36 and 27 per cent lower respectively. When expressed by means of a relation of average selling price to costs (“productivity” of cost elements), the differences are even more visible (comp. Tab. 4 ): overall superiority of Samsung over its competitors exceeded 51 per cent!