Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
differences between jamestown and new england colonies
differences between jamestown and new england colonies
differences between jamestown and new england colonies
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
There were vast differences between the difficulties experienced by the first settlers of Jamestown, Virginia and the Pilgrims who settled in New England in more ways than one. While the Pilgrims fled Europe because of religious persecution, the Jamestown colony was established solely as a business venture. While life was difficult for both groups of settlers upon reaching the new world, the Jamestown venture was doomed to fail from the beginning; but where the Jamestown settlers failed, the Pilgrims succeeded. The motives for traveling to America were different for each group but were instrumental in their eventual success or failure.
The Virginia Company was granted a charter by King James the 1st to travel to North America mainly to find gold; but also to engage in “glassblowing, silk raising, winemaking and exploring the rivers” (C&G 28) in addition to trying to find a water route to the Orient ("History of Jamestown"). The company neglected to take into account that farming would be a necessary requirement. In choosing who to send on the expedition, gentlemen from the upper class were selected along with a small group of artisans, craftsmen and laborers (C&G 27). This was one of many mistakes that paved the road on the way to the eventual failure of the venture; the people selected were ill-equipped to deal with the elements and hardships they faced upon their arrival. The leaders were unaccustomed to hard work and lacked the organizational skills required to survive and thrive in the new environment. They also lacked the diplomatic skills required to deal with the Powhatan Native American’s they encountered. Faced with the very real possibility of losing their lands and facing the potential extinction of their peo...
... middle of paper ...
.... New York: Longman, 2006. Print.
"History of Jamestown." Historic Jamestowne. Preservation Virginia. Web. 3 Feb 2014. .
"Mayflower and the Mayflower Compact." Plymouth Plantation. ©2003-2014 Plimoth Plantation. Web. 9 Feb 2014. .
"The House of Burgesses." U.S. History: Britain in the New World. Independence Hall Association in Philadelphia. Web. 9 Feb 2014. .
"Religion in Early Virginia." Colonial Williamstown. The Colonial Williamsburg Foundation. Web. 11 Feb 2014. .
"Research Starters: Plymouth Colony." 2014 Scholastic Inc. Grolier Incorporated, n.d. Web. 9 Feb 2014. .
Jamestown and Plymouth were both founded by early European settlers that wanted to find a new land in which they could gain personal benefits, although each of the two groups had similar goals and their entire foundation of being in the new land was completely different. The settlers from both colonies were very similar in their way of living but a few differences such as reasons for colonization, religious differences, and relations with the Indians set them apart.
There were blacksmiths, ship builders and all other trades were taken advantage of by those seeking work. The main difference between these two areas (north and south) was the labor fields. In New England, the labor was paid for and in the south it was based off of free labor and indentured servants. The economic system grew in the south because of cash crops such as tobacco. The economic system grew in the north because of people’s want and desire to work hard and better the colony. Another main difference between the two were those who populated the area. In the north, the population was based on family units and 90% of them were decedents from people from before 1642. The families were stable. In the south, the population was mainly single white men in their twenties. The cause of this was the fact that Jamestown was set by the Virginia Company and sought a profit. Families seeking religious freedom founded
Jamestown and Plymouth were both very intense colonies. Jamestown had obligations only for financial purposes. Whereas, Plymouth cared for so much more. It had obligations for a variety of religions. In this colony, people were very fond of God. William Bradford once said, “ Nevertheless, to keep a good conscience. and walk in such a way as God has prescribed in his word, is a thing which I must prefer before you all, and above life itself.” Therefore, Plymouth was far more fair and reasonable, because of their interest in God and their opportunities for their religious variety. Even though, both colonies had many similarities like being helped by Native Americans, and they both encountered sickness, death, and struggle; Plymouth’s purpose
Virtual Jamestown. "Indenture Contract of Richard Lowther." Personal Narratives from the Virtual Jamestown Project, 1575-1705. http://etext.lib.virginia.edu/etcbin/jamestown-browse?id=J1046
In 1629, a royal charter was granted to a group of wealthy Puritans. Their enterprise was the Massachusetts Bay Company. “Future governor John Winthrop stated their purpose quite clearly: "We shall be as a city upon a hill, the eyes of all people
The most notable political system of the Chesapeake region was the House of Burgesses in the Virginia colony. The House of Burgesses was a representative democracy that was formed in 1619. It favored the rich, as only rich white males were represented in government. It was often called a “planter aristocracy”, as the rich, white planters were the only people that participated in government. As a result of this, there was almost no social mobility, which was also an effect of slavery. This political system emerged largely in part due to the economic system, as farmers were already in power. Even though this system was democratic, it resembled an aristocracy more than a
They landed in Virginia unaware of the treacherous winter that was nearing. They found out very quickly that the heavenly narrative was quite the opposite. Staying alive was hard for many, especially when the first winter came. A staggering amount of people died the first winter even with the helping hand of the Native Americans. Edward portrayed the relationship between the two groups as peaceful as the Native Americans took the settlers under their wing. He noted that “The old planters (as they thought now come to reape the benefit of their long travels) placed with wonderful content upon their private dividends, and the planting of particular Hundreds and Colonies pursed with a hopeful alacrity, all our projects…in a faire way, and their familiarity with the natives, seeming to open a faire gate for their conversation to Christianitie.” This demonstrates that there was no tension between the settlers and Native Americans. The hospitality shows courteous relationship they shared with one another. Gary Nash shares the same stance of a peaceful friendship when he wrote about trade, stating that “Only a friendly Indian could be a trading Indian. If trade was key to overseas development, then English promoters logically suggested that the Indian might be receptive and generous- a person who could be wooed and won to the advantages of trade.” In other words, there was conflict with one another due
Surviving anywhere south of New England was a major challenge for the colonists in the seventeenth century in part due to the overwhelming majority of men in society combined with a high death rate. Just to continue a family was a daunting challenge, and in many cases, this venture proved unsuccessful. Population consistency was sustained only through the immigration of people from England until the later portion of the seventeenth century when the population began to rise on its own. The New England colonies, however, were polar opposites in every sense. Be...
Of Plymouth Plantation by William Bradford and A Description of New England by John Smith are essentially irrelevant to one another in the way that each piece has a very different point of view. The author John Smith was a pilgrim who arrived in the Americas and wrote a description of the new land. William Bradford was also a pilgrim who arrived at Plymouth and wrote more about the realities of his personal journey. The purpose of this essay is to contrast the purposes of the writers, their intended audiences, and how each writer gives out a specific feeling.
The Chesapeake and New England regions were settled by people of English descent, but by 1700, they had become two distinctly different societies. They had evolved so differently, mainly because of the way that the settlers followed their religion, their way of conducting politics and demographics in the colonies. Even though the settlers came from the same homeland: England, each group had its own reasons for coming to the New World and different ideas planned for the colonies.
Most of the Pilgrims were members of the Separatist congregation that had split from the Church of England. However, some were not, and these people sought independence from the Separatists. To prevent this, Separatist leaders wrote the Compact, which was formed after the covenant that had established their Separatist faith. Each male adult signed the document. The signers agreed to follow all "just and equal" laws that the settlers enacted and to be ruled by the will of majority. Plymouth Colony did not receive an English royal charter, and so the compact determined governmental authority in the colony until it became part of the Massachusetts colony in 1691. They thought that they needed to this to survive, because they needed rules. Without this they might have ended up killing each other. People thought with this it would give equal power to the separatist and the people who was against them. Was also good because it kept mutiny contained.
In the early stages of North American colonization by the English, the colony of Jamestown, Virginia was founded in 1607 (Mailer Handout 1 (6)). Soon after the Massachusetts Bay Colony was founded in 1629 (Mailer Handout 2 (1)). These two colonies, although close in the time they were founded, have many differences in aspects of their lives and the way they were settled. The colonies have a different religious system, economic system, political system, and they have a different way of doing things; whether that be pertaining to making money, practicing religion, or electing governors. Along with the differences, there are also a sameness between these two colonies. Each colony has been derived from England and has been founded by companies
The Chesapeake region of the colonies included Virginia, Maryland, the New Jerseys (both East and West) and Pennsylvania. In 1607, Jamestown, the first English colony in the New World (that is, the first to thrive and prosper), was founded by a group of 104 settlers to a peninsula along the James River. These settlers hoped to find gold, silver, a northwest passage to Asia, a cure for syphilis, or any other valuables they might take back to Europe and make a profit. Lead by Captain John Smith, who "outmaneuvered other members of the colony's ruling and took ruthlessly took charge" (Liberty Equality Power, p. 57), a few lucky members of the original voyage survived. These survivors turned to the local Powhatan Indians, who taught them the process of corn- and tobacco-growing. These staple-crops flourished throughout all five of these colonies.
Often when looking at American history, people tend to lump all the characters and actors involved as similar. This is especially the case in regards to Early American Colonial history. Because the Puritan communities that grew rapidly after John Winthrop’s arrival in 1630 often overshadow the earlier colony at Plymouth, many are lead to assume that all settlers acted in similar ways with regard to land use, religion, and law. By analyzing the writings of William Bradford and John Winthrop, one begins to see differing pictures of colonization in New England.
Both Jamestown and Plymouth are the part of our history, part of our life. However, they have so many different things between them. But that is the way we build our country. The country which always respects yourself. You have freedom of speech, freedom of religions. There are some conflict between Modern Americans and Native Americans. But It should decrease day by day. If I choose one company to go with, I would choose the Second Group to go to Plymouth. Because I am not recommending to grow tobacco to earn money. And the most significant. Although there are many points are not equivalent, but now we have got a strong country with one of the biggest army in the world. The reason to go with William Bradford, we can find our religion freely. The special thing which we get right now is the freedom of each person and a powerful