Comparing the Biological and Psychodynamic Paradigms of Psychopathology

2476 Words5 Pages

A paradigm is a form of framework of general perspective, which helps and guides the study and treatment of psychopathology The paradigm helps the scientists and psychologists to shape up what they want to investigate, and diagnose in the area of abnormal mental health, understanding paradigms helps them explore subjective influences that may affect their work. And Psychopathology is the study of mental illness or mental distress and the manifestation of behaviours of mental illness or psychological impairment. kring,Johnson,Davison,neale (2010)

There are currently four paradigms of psychopathology, they are genetic, neuroscience, psychodynamic, cognitive behavioural and Diathesis–stress, The two main system presently in use by Psychologists and health professional in the UK and USA are the Diagnostic And Statistical Manual DSM-IV and the International Classification of Diseases (ICD 10).this helps the doctors and psychiatrists to communicate easily about problems, it guide them for the prognosis and as well as for treatment. American Psychiatric Association. (2003

The essay has chosen two paradigms of psychopathology, to compare, biological which include (genes& neuroscience, biomedical, Biochemistry) and psychodynamic which is also called (Freudian based theory)

The biological paradigm views abnormal behaviour as caused by biological factors. The biological factors associated with mental illness usually affect the brain in one way or other, for example a specific disorder that is caused by brain damage or malfunction is Alzheimer’s disease. When searching for causes of mental illness, people who consult the biological model look to the following causes of illness.

There are considered to be four causal factors of a...

... middle of paper ...

...ovelman, J, A., & Scheibel, A, B. (1984). A neurohistological correlate of schizophrenia. Biological Psychiatry, 19, 1601.

Tamminga, C, A. (1991) Schizophrenia research. New York: Raven Press.

McLeod, J. (2003) An Introduction to Counselling. Third Edition. Berkshire: Open University Press.

Nelson-Jones, R. (2006) Theory and Practice of Counselling and Therapy. Fourth Edition. London: Sage Publications Ltd.

Reeves, J. (2005). The Medical Models. Health and Society. Comhlth 102. University of Auckland.

Rice, D., Haralambos, M. (2000) Psychology in Focus: AS Level, Reprint (2002), Ormskirk, Causeway Press Ltd. p155-172

Stokes, M. (1998) Neurological Physiotherapy. London:Mosby

Wong, Agatha W. S.; Chi-yue Chiu; Mok, Jessica W. Y.; Wong, Josephine G. W. S.; Chen, Eric Y. H.. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, Sep2006, Vol. 45 Issue 3, p427-436,

Open Document