Essay PreviewMore ↓
Compare the behavior and reactions of Richard, Anne and Elizabeth in Act One Scene Two and Act Four Scene Four.
In the start of both scenes, both Elizabeth and Anne are enraged and verbally attack Richard. Both women did not intend to marry Richard. hard was a very clever man, until he became king. He became over confident and did not even realise when he was losing a battle with the not-so-soft Elizabeth. He was successful with the weak, tenderhearted Anne in Act one Scene Two. He was very ruthless. He was very determined to get what he wanted, whatever he had to do for it.
In Act Scene Two, Richard is very clever and intelligent with his moves in convincing Anne to marry him. In fact his knowledge and organisation led him to having three stages of development in manipulating Anne. Anne was an easy target though. He thought that Elizabeth was just as easy to convince, so he did not put any extra effort in. But little did he know that that extra effort would have saved his life. He totally put aside his manipulation skills and took it calm and easy in Act Four Scene Four, so he had to get quite desperate at the end of the scene. He was satisfied to know that he won both oral battles against the ladies, at least he thought so. But Elizabeth was not as weak as poor Anne was. She had a couple of tricks up her sleeve. She was aware of Richard’s evil plans. She had a feeling Richard had slaughtered her dear sons, as well as innocent lady Anne. She knew for sure that he had murdered Anne’s husband and father in-law. And she had a feeling that he had done more harm than what meets the eye. She acted as though she gave in and made the path clear for Richard to marry her daughter (Elizabeth, of the same name).
Richard had weakened since he had become king and was no longer ruthless as he had no reason to be ruthless. He had got what he wanted and was pleased with himself. He thought he was invincible, and he was too confident, which cost him his life. If he had been more careful, he would have been aware of the danger that lied before him. But, he did use some similar techniques in both the scenes.
How to Cite this Page
"Comparing the Behavior of Characters in Richard III." 123HelpMe.com. 15 Nov 2019
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- The Evil King in Shakespeare's Richard III Richard is an actor, a fully evil actor, who through his mastery of the stage has come to appreciate his skill. Richard Moulton, in his Shakespeare as a Dramatic Thinker, proclaims Richard's wonder at his own command of the stage: "Richard has become an artist in evil: the natural emotions attending crime-whether of passionate longing, or horror and remorse-have given place to artistic appreciation of masterpieces" (40). And Robert Weimann, comparing Richard Gloucester to a character in Shakespeare's King John states: "Both characters exemplify a strenuous need to perform, 'toiling desperately' to play a role, 'to find out,' and, for better or wor... [tags: Richard II Richard III Essays]
1880 words (5.4 pages)
- There are five female characters in the play Richard III. Of these five there are four central female characters; the Duchess of York, Richard's mother; Anne who later becomes Richard's wife; Queen Margaret who was the former queen and Richard's arch enemy and Queen Elizabeth, the current queen. The final female character who plays a minor role in the play is Queen Elizabeth's daughter, Elizabeth, but she is merely a pawn in Richard's plan and we never meet her. Each woman has a significant role in Richard III and is vital to the script.... [tags: five female characters in Richard III]
1428 words (4.1 pages)
- The real tragedy of Richard III lies in the progressive isolation of its protagonist. From the very opening of the play when Richard III enters "solus", the protagonist's isolation is made clear. Richard's isolation progresses as he separates himself from the other characters and breaks the natural bonds between Man and nature through his efforts to gain power. The first scene of the play begins with a soliloquy, which emphasizes Richard's physical isolation as he appears alone as he speaks to the audience.... [tags: Richard II Richard III Essays]
1206 words (3.4 pages)
- Richard III and Adolf Hitler In William Shakespeare's Richard III, we see Shakespeare's interpretation of despot rule and the parallels that stem from this interpretation. The character type of Richard has been examined and marveled for thousands of years. From Plato's examination of despot rule in the Republic, we see the motives of what drives despot rulers. A look at the background of Richard and how his upbringing and personal life contributed to his insecurities will help to understand why someone may become a despot.... [tags: Richard II Richard III Essays]
731 words (2.1 pages)
- Richard III and Deformity Some scholars insist that Richard was neither crippled nor humpbacked, and they are passionately dedicated to proving that Shakespeare's portrait of the inhuman monster is based on Tudor propaganda used to bolster Henry VII's weak claim to the throne The only "proof" we have of Richard III's deformity is that which is provided by Sir Thomas More in "The History of King Richard the Third". It is here that modern readers digest the adjectives which forever plague Richard "Little of stature, ill-featured of limbs, crooked-backed, his left shoulder much higher than his right".... [tags: Richard II Richard III Essays]
438 words (1.3 pages)
- Sun Imagery in Shakespeare's Richard III Shakespeare's Richard III is a play pervasive in figurative language, one of the most notable being the symbolic image of the sun and the shadow it casts. In an examination of a short passage from the text, it will be argued that Richard is compared to a shadow in relation to the sun, which has traditionally been held as a symbol of the king. The passage is significant not only because it speaks volumes about the plots of Richard, but also because it is relevant in understanding the overall plot of the play, which in the first few acts is almost indistinguishable from the plot of the scheming Duke of Gloucester.... [tags: Richard II Richard III Essays]
609 words (1.7 pages)
- William Shakespeare's Richard III William Shakespeare’s characterization of Britain’s historical monarch Richard III, formerly Duke of Gloucester, is one of the most controversial in literature. To this day there are arguments upholding Richard III’s villainy and ascertaining his murder of the Princes in the tower, just as there are those who believe that he has been falsely represented by Shakespeare’s play and fight avidly to clear his name of any and all crimes. Because of the uncertainty surrounding his true character, Richard III is an intriguing personality to put into modern culture, which is exactly what Ian McKellen does in his rendition of the infamous ruler.... [tags: William Shakespeare Richard III Essays]
843 words (2.4 pages)
- The Supernatural in Shakespeare's Richard III Casting a darkly mythical aura around Richard III, supernatural elements are intrinsic to this Shakespearean history play. The prophetic dreams of Clarence and Stanley blur the line between dream and reality, serving to foreshadow impending doom. The ghosts that appear before Richard III and Richmond before their battle create an atmosphere of dread and suspense, and they also herald Richard's destiny. The curses of three female royalties are fulfilled at the end, serving as reminders that the divine powers are stronger than Richard's malice.... [tags: Richard III William Shakespeare Essays Papers]
1457 words (4.2 pages)
- Shakespeare on Machiavelli: The Prince in Richard III According to many, Shakespeare intentionally portrays Richard III in ways that would have the world hail him as the ultimate Machiavel. This build up only serves to further the dramatic irony when Richard falls from his throne. The nature of Richard's character is key to discovering the commentary Shakespeare is delivering on the nature of tyrants. By setting up Richard to be seen as the ultimate Machiavel, only to have him utterly destroyed, Shakespeare makes a dramatic commentary on the frailty of tyranny and such men as would aspire to tyrannical rule.... [tags: Richard II Richard III Essays Shakespeare]
1505 words (4.3 pages)
- Seduction in Richard III Seduction is definitely a dominant theme in Richard III. I noticed another instance of it to go along with the ones discussed in class the other night. Richard's wooing of Lady Anne is more than obvious than the example I've found; but, Act 1 scene 4 definitely contains another instance of seduction. This is Clarence's murder scene and the murderers have to convince one another to actually carry through with the act. Murderer One is the first to exhibit a hint of hesitation.... [tags: Richard II Richard III Essays]
351 words (1 pages)
In both scenes, Richard uses bribe to win his opponent over. In both Act One Scene Two, Richard offers Anne the status of the queen, saying that if she marries him, she would be the queen of England. Similarly, he tells Elizabeth that if she let him marry her daughter, she would be the grandmother of the prince/princess/princes/princesses of England. Hearing this, Richard hoped that they might be tempted into marrying him. Also, in both cases, Richard did not actually truly love his target, he only wanted to marry them because he wanted to be known as a king with a good wife or so he could have kids easily. He lied about being in love with them. “Your beauty was the cause of this effect”, (Act One Scene Two) is just a lie. He also says in Act Four Scene Four, “Then know that from my soul, I love thy daughter”. That is just as bad an untruthful statement.
I have a feeling that both the women he chose to talk to were the wrong people. Both the ladies’ family members he had murdered, so it would be a harder job to convince them. If he chose someone else who was not aware of his iniquity, it would be easier for him to convince them. But Shakespeare chose to make this happen in his play, because this would make it more of an interesting play, rather than a plain, old, boring, straight forward play. Shakespeare wanted his audience to be engrossed in his play. He wanted his play to have lots bumps and rides so it would not be boring. I personally would be bored if there was no dilemma in a story. Every single story needs a dilemma, e.g. one fine day a girl was playing in the park... until a dragon came and attacked her! But then a boy came and eliminated the dragon and the girl and boy became friends. A dilemma and a happy ending is the key to a story that people would be engaged in, and Shakespeare had that.
Shakespeare made Elizabeth very bitter to opponents, sharp, and intelligent. The queen of the time, whose name also happened to be Elizabeth, was pleased with Shakespeare because he gave “Elizabeth” a good character. Elizabeth was exacting on words that Richard used, such as, “Her life is only safest at her birth”, and Elizabeth replies sarcastically, “And only in that safety died her brothers”. Elizabeth uses a lot of sarcasm, which shows she has a sense of humour. At one point Richard says, “All unavoided is the doom of destiny.” Elizabeth twists his words and says, ”True, when avoided grace makes destiny: My babes where destined to a fairer death, If grace had blessed thee with a fairer life”.
In Act One Scene Two, Richard was in control of the conversation with Anne. He had the dominating voice. But in Act Four Scene Four, Richard is matched with his opponent, or even weaker that his opponent. So the conversation blew out of his hands and out of control. Elizabeth was mostly in control, and she was the one with the dominating voice. Richard had underestimated Elizabeth.
The only difference is overall in the two scenes is that Richard succeeds in his mission the first time, but not the second. And the reasons for that are: prepared
§ He was sharp and agile in Act One Scene Two, but blunts down in Act Four Scene Two, without knowing it.
§ Anne was an easy opponent, as she knew for sure that her husband was dead. What has she got to live for? She was in a very vulnerable mood at the procession, where the body of her beloved was. But she was weak at the heart too.
§ Elizabeth was strong and wanted to get Richard back, for all the damage he has done, but was sad at the same time because her sons went missing (and Richard was supposed to be protecting them). She showed her grief in anger.
§ Also, Anne was not prepared for fight, because Richard approached her. But Elizabeth equipped for the battle and got ready before she approached him.
Richard overall was an odious character who was selfish and greedy. He put so many people in misery and did not even feel the slightest sorry for them. He was a heartless brute. He was a mean bully who wanted to rule the world and be very powerful, whatever he had to do for it. Mainly, I think that the main reason why he succeeded in Act One Scene Two and not in Act Four Scene Four was that Richard grew weaker after he became king, which made him think he was invincible. I also think that it was partly because Anne was feeble and frail and was easy to defeat while Elizabeth had a clear idea of what she needed to do and was sturdy, quick and intelligent and ready for a battle.