Comparative Study: Assassinations of Caesar and Lincoln

1141 Words3 Pages

Julius Caesar and Abraham Lincoln are undeniably two men who made history through their leadership expeditions on their respective nations. When comparing the two, one key aspect of how they made history comes into mind: their assassination. Hence, comparing the assassination of an American president to that of Julius Caesar reveals both similarities and differences. Ultimately, the major of comparing the two is through the similarity between the two assassinations. In this case, they were carried out by people who disagreed with Lincoln and Caesar’s authority and power, and how they used this power and authority.

In most modern and ancient histories, Julius Caesar is considered a demagogue and a dictator. If so, then Caesar’s assassination was an act of defending the republic. The perpetrators of this act called themselves the liberators who were led by Junius Brutus and Cassius Longinus. As documented by Nicolaus of Damascus, many plans had been laid out by the group. The liberators never met in the open but held their meetings in each other’s houses a few at a time (Alvin …show more content…

In this case, the rise of Caesar’s power was considered by some as disregard and disrespect of authority, tradition, and Roman rules. Caesar on many occasions challenged Roman commander Pompey and his main opponent, thus leading to many civil wars. Additionally, his decision to cross Rubicon was contrary to the Roman law that restricted him to enter Rome because he was a governor of Gaul at the time. Additionally, following Pompey’s death, Caesar conferred more powers to himself by diluting the Senate’s reaches and powers (Alvin 82). One major flaw that Caesar possessed was his strong ambition. This made him overconfident and thought he had become invincible both in Rome and battle. Because his soldiers respected and loved him, Caesar thought that he would pursue whatever he desired. This is what led to his

Open Document