When a company hires a new Chief Executive Officer (CEO), the company must decide how to compensate the CEO. There are many ways of compensating CEOs, and they all have advantages and disadvantages. These can include things such as salaries, stock options, bonuses, and other benefits. How the company decides to arrange all the things for its CEO can be very crucial to the company’s success. One of the most interesting decision the company must make is whether to give its CEO a golden parachute, and what the company decides to offer as a compensation package, can be one of the most important decision the board of a company makes. Compensation packages are one of the biggest reasons a CEO would choose one job over a different job. Most CEOs, and people in general, want to make the most possible money from their job, so they will choose the job that allows for that. This means that for a company to get the best CEO, which in theory would mean the company would be the most profitable, the company needs to have the best compensation package. However, having a compensation package that is too high is also not good because it wastes money and may have negative effects on the company. A salary is probably the most common compensation a CEO receives, and it is the simplest. Other common …show more content…
That seems good; however, it is not so simple. If a CEO stands to get a ton of money if he or she is laid off during a merger, he or she might want to lay him or herself off to get the benefits. This makes golden parachutes not so good, but a lot of CEO still receives them because companies know CEOs want them, and some companies think they can get a better CEO if they offer one. Another thing companies must consider is the sector they are in because golden parachutes are a lot more important in sectors with frequent
According to Charity Navigator (Are Nonprofit CEOs Overpaid?), certain industries pay more than others, specifically; an executive can earn more at an Educational charity rather than a Religious one. Geographical location typically reflects the variations in cost of living throughout the country. Naturally, charities with larger budgets can afford to provide higher compensation. The focus of an organization's mission can also have a significant impact on the amount of compensation available. The board of a nonprofit should have a documented policy for determining compensation and raises. While there are not very many charitable organization executives earning over $1 million dollars annually, it should still be of concern because such an amount is quite
...ith strong share price and some of them will get the organisation with the worst conditions of company performance. This is when the corporate governance bringing the right direction for organisation making best practice in deciding executive remuneration to sufficiently attract and motivate, eventhough to reach the satisfactory result there is a long way to go, involves time and efforts. The executives' remuneration at WH Smith especially for CEO is considered appropriate because it does not rely on agency theory alone but also considered the guidelines of the UK Corporate Government Code (2010) which is to attract, retain and motivate directors. To support this argument, “high pay itself is not evidence of inefficient contracts but may simply reflect the market for CEOs and the pay necessary to attract, retain, and motivate talented individuals.” (Conyon, M. 2006)
Compensation is made of a base salary (paid by the hour, work or the year; excluding overtime or bonuses), variable pay (bonuses, profit sharing/stock options which work hand and hand with the performance of the company), and benefits (to include health insurance/savings plans – 401(k), or tuition reimbursement). The traditional way of determining base pay for jobs was to compare jobs in the same industry. Now industry and market, no long work by themselves, the current thinking is more person-based that considers knowledge, skills, and competencies of the work. This, however, is best suited for high-performing environments that remain flexible in their deployment of human capital.
Steve's salary while being the CEO of apple was $1 a year. Did you know that? He tried to show and teach his employees that money has no value. Although, he did own the majority of the shares in Apple, and that makes up for his $1 a year salary by A LOT. -- That is besides the point.
Up to 8.5% of terminally ill patients express a sustained and persuasive for an early death (Marks and Rosielle). Terminally ill patients have long lasting, painful deaths and they should have the option of assisted suicide so they don’t have to go through that. Assisted suicide is when a patient writes a written request to a doctor and after two days the doctor can prescribe lethal drugs to the patient (Engber). The doctor can’t administer them himself, that would be euthanasia, the patients has to take them him or herself (Engber). Assisted suicide should be legal because it ends patient's suffering and pain, and it is their individual right to determine their own fate.
Imagine being in a world where people are paid in cash bonuses, stock options, or generous severance pay when fired from their job due to a company merger, are asked to leave, or choose to retire. This happens to be a reality for many CEO’s and top executives of companies. We live in an economy where mergers and take over’s have become common, and to allow this option for the highest paid employees of a company is arguably unfair. While researching golden parachutes, I formed questions due to the circumstances surrounding this executive option. For example, why should CEO’s, who live very comfortably, be given a compensation package for losing their position due to a company merger or retirement when employee and shareholder’s futures are at stake? Is it fair for the rich to get richer when numerous employees below top executives are dealt the same fate from a merger and shareholders’ investments are at risk but neither receive a form of additional compensation? Of course, there’re those who support the issuance of golden parachutes, arguing they can persuade a possible company merger to not take place due to the costs associated with a top executives golden parachute package. Another supporting point for golden parachutes is, they can make it easier for higher up executives, like CEO’s be absorbed into the future merged company. I will be addressing the point of whether CEO’s and other executives deserve to be awarded a Golden Parachute option by their company. As well as a brief background of Golden Parachutes and my stance on them. They’re a very important part of our growing economy and will always be considered in a merger/takeover if awarded to executives.
CEO compensation has been a heated debate for many years recently, and it can be argued that they are either overpaid or that there payment is justified by the amount of work they do and their performance. To answer the question about whether CEO compensation is justified it must be looked at by the utilitarian viewpoint where the good of many outweighs the good of one. It is true that many CEO’s are paid an exorbitant amount of money; however, their payment is justified by the amount of money that they bring back to the company and the shareholders. There are many factors that impact the pay that the CEO receives according to Shah et.al CEO compensation relies on more than just the performance of the CEO, there are a number of factors that play a rule in the compensation of the CEO including the fellow people who help govern the corporation (Board of Directors, Audit Committee), the size of the company, and the performance that the CEO accomplishes (2009). In this paper the focus will be on the performace aspect of the CEO.
Remuneration management is defined as the sum received for an employment or service delivered, this includes the money received on a monthly basis as well as benefits given as rewards (investopedia,para.1 ). Individualism need to be taken into account when implementing these remuneration structures or reward schemes, equal pay plays a role in balancing earnings among the diverse workforce (Shen, Chanda, D’Neetto and Monga,2009,p.241). The Woolworth’s Holdings uphold remuneration policies which have the purpose of making sure to attract and hold on to the best talent, that they are congruent with the strategies of the company and are the determinants of performance during the short and long phases. The policy considers the board members and the employees. This policy manages employees of the company by giving...
The board membership, irrespective of executive or non executive membership, is very crucial in the governance and management of the company. However, as the duties and responsibilities of directors vary according to their type of directorship; the rewards should also match the responsibilities carried out and be in line with the performance shown over period of time.
Attracting and retaining the most talented employees is essential for long-term organizational success. An important component to attracting and retaining such employees is the design and implementation of an effective compensation and benefit system. Assuming the role of a highly regarded human resource consultant hired to review, analyze, and revise the compensation and benefit system utilized by my city’s largest employer, Holland Enterprises, this paper presents a revised compensation and benefit strategy that suits the firm. This proposal describes how an effective compensation and benefit system could contribute to organizational effectiveness in the firm, the principle components of the revised compensation and benefit system for the
Compensation is the remuneration received by an employee in return for his/ her contribution to the organization. It is an organized practice involving the provision of monetary and non-monetary benefits to employees (citehr.com). Em¬ployee compensation includes all forms of pay and rewards received by employees for the performance of their jobs. Direct compensation comprises of employee wages and salaries, incentives, bonuses, and commissions. Indirect compensation comprises the many benefits supplied by employers, and nonfinancial compensation includes em¬ployee recognition programs, rewarding jobs, and flexible work hours to accommodate personal needs (www.indiana.edu/~busx420/Book.../chap09.doc).
Organizations are working hard in today’s world of business, not only to remain competitive, but also to focus on stability and structure. Employees are the backbone of an organization. It is becoming more important to offer quality HRM programs to staff, in order to support the retention of trained and experienced staff. Employees have always been concerned with salary however, there is a new focus emerging that looks at compensation as a whole entity. Monetary wages are now just as important as other benefits such as paid time off, medical and dental offerings and retirement. This paper will discuss the importance of the total compensation program which includes many aspects, not just salary. Attention must be paid to equal pay, pay
Reward systems have been evolving and growing throughout the years, but there are many types that have always been there. Base pay is the most common, which is an employee’s base wages and salary that they are paid on hourly, weekly, monthly, or annually (Luthans, 2011, p.94). Merit based pay is another type of incentive, which rewards and motivates an individual to perform their jobs to the standards of their employers. According to the text Organizational Behaviors, by Fred Luthans, there are three other options for paying an employee for their performance: individual incentives pay plans, using of bonuses, and the use of stock options. Individual based pay plans are based on the employees output and/or quality. Some organizations use bonuses as incentives to their employees. These are offered sometimes as op...
Holland Enterprises is on a new strategic direction, to attract and retain the most talented employees and to reduce turn over. Human resource department has came up with a new compensation plan. In the propose compensation and benefits system plan , I will explain a new compensation plan for Holland Enterprises, also I will explain the components of the compensation and benefit system plan in order to attract and motivate employees to be productive . In order for the compensation and benefits system plan to be operational, the package should include a necessary level of compensations to fulfill basic needs, equity with the external labor market, equity within the organization (Henderson, 2006).
...ons based on job responsibilities and pay level. Many companies provide with incentives to managers and employees to encourage them to excel in their duties. These incentives may be Bonus, Commission, Profit sharing, Gain sharing. Companies provide Employee benefits. The major ones are insurance and retirement benefits.