Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Importance of different forms of communication
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Importance of different forms of communication
Communication is a concept that people around the world use to inform each other about information. It is so widely used that people developed more than one way to converse. In social media, people use the internet, along with computers and smartphones, to post interesting comments about themselves or others. When you read the daily newspaper, the journalists are telling you headlines that are related to you or the public. In a college classroom, students who give speeches are using their voice as a communicative tool. All of these methods of communication are made up from society, and they are effective at making conversations easier to understand. However, there is one communicative device that is not as effectual as these, texting. It is …show more content…
Regardless of feeling, people want to make the texting dialect easier on their fingers and reading. Time is such a crucial part of everyday life, and making texting an easier task is one way to save time, but there is one fault. People have created a language in texting world that is non-understandable, using short abbreviations, such as “lol,” meaning “laugh out loud,” “btw,” meaning “by the way,” and “iky,” meaning “I know right.” These short phrases, if considered phrases, are how people save their time by pushing less buttons to create text messages and reading less words to comprehend quicker. Although this is a physically time-efficient idea, the benefit cannot apply to each individual. Everyone does not understand this new jargon, for it is not taught in public schools. In that case, the new texting language has a purpose, but it has no importance in society since it is not part of a school’s curriculum. It will be a waste of time to create a new language if it is not focused at the local or global …show more content…
People are restricted to opening and turning on their handheld device and reading the message word to word; however, there is an exception to the restriction. Some cellphone users are quick and efficient when using their handheld devices, so they could read a text message in just a matter of seconds. That being true, the reader still needs to take the time to open and read the message from his or her device. Those few seconds spent into opening and reading may seem like nothing, but they add up with each message read. In that case, it is better to understand texting as time-consuming instead of time-saving. To add on, the reader will waste more time reading a text message if he or she does not understand the unusual language used, that is “lol” and “btw”. Instead of spending a few seconds reading a message, the reader will spend minutes looking up sources to better understand it. A downfall like that makes texting an inefficient time-saving practice, for the time used to read could have been utilized for something
In the article, “Does Im Make U dum”, the author states how instant messaging has made us become “dum”. The issue of using popular texting abbreviations like, “lol”, “brb”, or “gtg” can either be an effective or unproductive way of expression. Using abbreviations through texting are so commonly used by children, teenagers, and adults. Statistics show that children are younger than ever for when they are first exposed to mobile phones and text messaging. A 2005 ChildWise study that one-in-four children under the age of eight had a mobile phone.
Instead of communicating verbally, one tends to text. People have lost the skills on how to look each other in the eye and talk! Without a cellphone I am able to have face to face conversations. I am able to look someone in the eye without hesitation and speak. I’m also able to hear the sincerity in someone’s voice that I’m speaking to them or the anger in their tone. Through text messages a person’s tone is always misinterpreted. A message that may have been sent with no mal intentions can be interrupted by the reader as sarcastic or rude. Cellphones can take that person to person connection
People’s lives are influenced by the lack of communicating. For example, in Hamilton Spectator’s article Wired For the Future, the writer explains the negative effects caused by the lack of communicating by saying, “[i]f teens stop communicating with their friends and others face to face, they will lose the ability to navigate complex social situations and that could be devastating for them when they are faced with college and job interviews....” (Hamilton Spectator 2). In other words, that when people keep forgetting how to communicate by overly using messaging systems, it could lead to negative problems in their lives: interviews or meeting with delegates. Those are important to people’s lives, because when children are independent and working in their jobs, they have to socialize with others. Communicating is unavoidable in social life, because people still communicate even though texting and messaging are taking enormous space in our world. In addition, People text too much without talking and communicating face to face. For instance, in Jessica Mazzola’s article Nighttime Texting, she showed the surveyed data of texting by saying, “...American teens send and receive an average of 1,500 texts per month” (Mazzola 1). By all means, texting is rooted deeply in people’s lives and replaced where real conversations should be. As the article mentioned, 1,500 texts per month should be affecting people’s lives directly. Communicating face-to-face and real conversations are certainly reduced dramatically as the texting increases. Therefore, people get influenced by the erosion of
Turkle warns that too much texting can lead to generations hiding behind screens and becoming completely isolated. As technology advances, the world becomes less social and more sheltered behind screens. When texting becomes a main source of communication, there can be words that are lost in transition. People will often take your words and contort them to make it either sound better or worse, depending on the topic of conversation. These twisted words can be used against you and make you look extremely different from what you wanted.
The author notes that technology would affect the way people use their language in a matter of using abbreviations when texting. He also noted that messaging causes poor spelling and laziness when typing simple words on the phone. Teenagers have been creating abbreviated words since texting became popular; but abbreviated words have been around way before mobile phones were released. Crystal states, “people have been initializing common phrases for ages” (902), and
Text messaging or texting, as it’s commonly called—is the process of sending or receiving messages via a cellular device. It is a common means of communication among teenagers and even becoming popular in the business world because it allows quick messages to be sent without people having to talk through a telephone conversation. A person is able to say what is needed, in addition the other person will receive the information and respond when it's convenient for them.
There are many different opinions focused around texting. Although, the fact of the matter is that language is constantly changing, and texting is becoming a popular, advanced language. Texting is not killing language, but instead it is improving language to fit our daily
Text messaging has become a norm in our generation, as technology rapidly advances and gives way to more efficient forms of communication in a fast-paced world; and many are skeptical about the influence this new form of interaction is having on our society, especially with our younger generation. David Crystal, a professor at the University of Wales, writes “2b or Not 2b?” in support of text messaging. He insists, despite those who underestimate or negate the beneficial influence text messaging has on language proficiency, that “there is increasing evidence that [texting] helps rather than hinders literacy” and that the fairly recent form of communication has actually been around for a while and “is merely the latest manifestation of the human ability to be linguistically creative and to adopt language to suit the demands of diverse settings. In contrast, Jeffery Kluger argues in “We Never Talk Anymore: The Problem with Text Messaging” that text messaging is rapidly becoming a substitute for more genuine forms of communication and is resulting in difficulty among young peoples of our generation to hold a face-to-face conversation, engage in significant nonverbal expression, and ultimately build effective relationships with family, friends and co-workers. Both writers’ present valid arguments, however, my personal experience with text messaging has led me to agree more with Crystal’s view on the matter. Text messaging is indeed having a positive effect on society by making frequent texters primarily aware of the need to be understood, as well as offering betterment of spelling and writing through practice, and reinventing and expanding on a bygone dimension of our language through the use of rebuses and abbreviations.
Critics claim that “texting language” is destroying English. Commonly, when people text they do not take advantage of proper grammar, and they will use shortcuts to write common words and phrases such as, “ you” and “are” by writing “U” and “R”. They claim that this makes people more likely to use poor grammar and spelling even in intense situations when eloquent writing is critical. However, texting was not meant to represent people’s mastery of language. It was meant to be split-second conversation and socialization over a distance.
Texting is one of the most popular ways to get ahold of people now in 2016. With something so big, of course, there is going to be new ways to communicate. The upsides to texting, which people don’t realize are “Texting is a different kind of writing,
With only “160 characters per message. To increase the amount of information they could cram into each message and save time on tapping them out, people started inserting abbreviations, skipping punctuation and using phonetic spelling” (“How Cell Phones”). When writing formal papers we all know that we have to spell out words, but some of the texting language have become a habit that slips into our writing every once and a while, and we have started talking and writing in this texting language as well. This has made our talking and writing informal and we are beginning to lose the original language. Another downfall to texting found by the Virginia Tech Transportation Institute, “the risk of being involved in a car accident rises dramatically when cell phones are involved; the lives of drivers, pedestrians, and cyclists are endangered daily by irresponsible people who are too distracted by their phone to pay attention to the road” (“How Cell Phones”). It really is sad that we continue to look at our phones even though we know we risk not only ending our lives but the lives of others as
In today’s culture, one of the fastest ways to communicate with others is through text messages. Text messages are a form of electronic messages sent from one cell phone to another minimizing the wait time for it to be sent and received. Through time text messages have transformed into its own writing system. From the use of spelling, grammar to the unregulated space in the orthographic regime, text messages have created a distinctive linguistic identity. This texting speech also known as “SMS Langauge” has gotten linguists eager at observing what they are considering “the biggest ever language revolution” (Kumar, "A Linguistic Study Of Abbreviations In SMS"). Text messages have a lot of underlying meaning composed in its language from being its own written form to being an expression of text users. Because of the rapid popularity and addictions texting has caused, linguists are researching whether texting language affects student’s literacy when it comes to language skills.
Text messaging is damaging our literacy and communication skills as a society. Calling someone on the phone or writing them a letter is rapidly becoming a thing of the past. There is a new language that is being learned and not taught across the globe. It is the language of Textese, and it has quickly consumed the lives of millions across the world. There will always be the protector of language arts. These are the shrinking number of people everyone knows, that will continue to handwrite letters and sign them with proper English and etiquette. It may be as simple as picking up the phone and calling a friend or relative. It may be even simpler than that, in that people put forth an effort to talk to the person sitting next to or across from you and engage them in a conversation. Texting and textisms have become so common and widespread that using proper English, correct spelling, and full sentences is also becoming a thing of the past. People that constantly use text and instant messaging may have difficulty with literacy and expressing themselves in writing form. The research shows that text messaging has deteriorated how we communicate and express ourselves because textisms have become an easier and quicker form of communication that has affected literacy in children and adults.
These teens tended to score lower on literacy tests than those that did not (Plester, Wood, Bell 143). It was also observed that high texters scored lower on verbal and non-verbal reasoning than those who do not text and minimal texters (Plester, Wood, Bell 140). Results from studies on texting indicated an overall negative effect on literacy test results (Verheijen 595). It has been suggested that students are not distinguishing between informal and formal environments and are texting at the wrong times and places (Verheijen 587). The general message that the media sends about the effects of texting tend to be rather negative overall. For example, texting and driving is considered very dangerous due to a distracted driver. Many teens are involved in accidents due texting and driving. It was elicited during a study that participants took longer and made more errors when they had to read text messages as opposed to reading Standard English (Kemp and Bushnell 18). Thurlow is quoted saying that texting “signals the slow death of language” and is “a threat to social progress” (qtd. in Verheijen 586). Texting has more of a negative effect on teens’ literacy and could possibly cause the English we use today could become
Nothing ever stays constant and the same is true for social media, the rules are always changing and it is easy to slip beneath the cracks if one is not on guard. The rules that the girls experience on Instagram stem from a need to be seen and the pressure surrounding the stage of life that they are in. Social media for them includes a social hierarchy achieved through carefully constructed comments and the number of likes that they can receive on a picture. The rules also place expectations on the girls support group and future potential friends through an exchange of comments and likes. However, there is no guarantee that what the girls are practicing now will be what they practice a year from now and there is no guarantee that they will be using Instagram. Over time the rules of social media simply transfer to another platform that is new and exciting. In a way rules are there to govern the platform on which they are implemented but at the same time