Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Consideration as it plays a multifunctional role in a contract
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Question 1 An offer is when a party, also known as the offeror express willingness to contract on certain terms, with the intention that it will become binding as soon as it is accepted by another party, known as the offeree. According to D's description in his advertisement, he is putting up his car for sales at $40,000. It can be considered as an offer because D have expressed that he is willing to sell his car with the intention that it will become binding and therefore the terms are clear that the car will be sold at a fixed price. Besides being an offer, it can also be an invitation to treat (ITT). An invitation to treat is different from an offer because in ITT, one party will invite the other to make the offer. Therefore in this case when D was advertising for his car, besides the price, there were no other details such as the name and address of D, model and colour of the car and it's vehicle identification number (VIN). It merely just an advertisement where D was inviting people to take the initiative to call D to enquire about the car and make an offer which means D's intention was negotiation between him and the other party. After reading the advertisement, E came forward to D with a cheque of $40,000 as stated on the advertisement. However, D rejected E's offer and in return E is suing him for breaching the contract. But according the previous analysis mentioned, the advertisement is an ITT instead of an offer, which means that the was no contract involved as D only stated a car, in general, without specifying which car was for sale. Therefore it shows if D does not accept the offer by E, there will be no contract. This concludes that there was no breach of contract as the offer was made but D rejecting it, thus m... ... middle of paper ... ...ferences Casebrief.me. 2014. Felthouse v Bindley | Case Brief Summary. [online] Available at: http://casebrief.me/casebriefs/felthouse-v-bindley/ [Accessed: 31 Mar 2014]. Lamance, K. 2014. Contract Consideration | LegalMatch Law Library. [online] Available at: http://www.legalmatch.com/law-library/article/contract-consideration.html [Accessed: 31 Mar 2014]. Lawnix.com. 2014. Stilk v. Myrick – Case Brief. [online] Available at: http://www.lawnix.com/cases/stilk-myrick.html [Accessed: 31 Mar 2014]. Legalmax.info. 2014. Offer or invitation to treat. [online] Available at: http://www.legalmax.info/members2/conbook/offer_or.htm [Accessed: 31 Mar 2014]. The Blawg of Ryan K. Hew, Attorney At Law. 2012. Draw the Law: What is an Offer?. [online] Available at: http://hawaiiesquire.wordpress.com/2012/02/14/draw-the-law-what-is-an-offer/ [Accessed: 31 Mar 2014].
Law School Case Brief | Legal Outlines| Study Materials: Kentucky v. King case brief, http://www.lawschoolcasebriefs.net/2013/11/kentucky-v-king-case-brief.html (last visited Sep 10,
"FindLaw | Cases and Codes." FindLaw | Cases and Codes. FINDLAW, n.d. Web. 19 Feb. 2014
"Summary of the Decision." Landmark Cases Of The U.S Supreme Court. Street Law, Inc, n.d. Web. 1 Nov. 2013. .
Linder, Douglas O. "Judge James E. Horton." UMKC School of Law. 1999. Web. 24 Feb. 2011.
A legal offer is “an offer that shows objective intent to enter into the contract, is definite, and is communicated to the offeree” (Kubasek et al, 2015, p. 244). The legal offer in question is the offer to supply Mr. Peterson’s requirement of Muscadine grapes at a price that he was already accustomed to paying. I believe that this offer did exist unilaterally by Marshall Peterson.
· “Plyler v. Doe” Online source. U.S. Supreme Court. Gov. 1982. 15 June. 2005 < http://www.tourolaw.edu/patch/Plyler/>
1) An offer allows the person or business to whom the offer is made to reasonably expect that the offering party is willing to be bound by the offer on the terms proposed. The terms of an offer must be definite and certain . Based on the facts presented in this case, Mr. Pending offered Mr. Thompson a 50 percent raise and a five-year contract. 2) Acceptance is a clear expression of the accepting party’s agreement to the terms of the offer . In applying the case facts, Mr. Thompson accepted Mr. Pending’s offer when he turned down the offer from Ms. Eugest to stay with White Arch Casino (WAC). 3) Consideration is a legal term given to the bargained-for exchange between the parties to the contract – something of value passing from one party to the other. Each party contract will gain some benefit from the agreement and incur some obligation in exchange for that benefit. Finally, Mr. Pending’s bargain-for exchange was if Mr. Thompson stayed with WAC he would receive his offer next
Rosales, Daniel, and Rose N. Petoskey. "Kansas v. Nebraska and Colorado." Legal Information Institute. Cornell Law, n.d. Web. 07 May 2015.
The English contract Offer and Acceptance General principles There are three basic essentials to the creation of a contract which will be recognised and enforced by the courts. These are: contractual intention, agreement and consideration. The Definition of an Offer. This is an expression of willingness to contract made with the intention (actual or apparent) that it shall become binding on the offeror as soon as the person to whom it is addressed accepts it. An offer can be made to one person or a group of persons, or to the world at large.
"Lynch v. Christie, 815 F. Supp. 2d 341 (D. Me. 2011)." Lynch v. Christie, 815 F. Supp. 2d 341 (D. Me. 2011). N.p., 7 Sept. 2011. Web. 24 Apr. 2014. .
An invitation to treat is an invitation to form a proposal, and thus there is no legal consequences. (Nabi Baksh and Arjunan, 2005) An offer must be differentiated from an invitation to treat. (Lee and Detta, 2009) In this question, Roland was making an invitation to treat when he displayed the price tag on the car vehicle. Actually, he is inviting customers to form an offer to him. When the customers consent the price and discussed with Roland, both of them actually are making the offer. In this situation, it is depends on whether Roland want accept or not. Thus, Bernie is making an offer when she consent to buy the car stated as RM10 000. Bernie implies her willingness to buy the car marked RM10 000 with the expectation of Roland will sell the car to her at this price. Obviously, Bernie is the offeror. A contract will come into being when the people who forms the invitation treat accepts the offer of the customer, for instance Roland accept the offe...
One of the last remaining strongholds of classical contract law is the notion that contracts require offer and acceptance therefore, in order for a contract to become binding, offer, acceptance, consideration and intention to create legal relations must exist. However contracts are formed in different ways for each different circumstance. (Shawn Bayern, Offer and Acceptance in Modern Contract Law: A Needles Concept, 103 Cal. L. Rev. 67, 102 (2015)
The defendant is an Airlines Company that had 900 employees. The economic crisis followed with monetary crisis gave bad effects to the defendant. They should decrease the number of their airplanes form 9 to 2 airplanes. They also had to do the efficiency on their employees to 700. On the efficiency process, there was an agreement between the defendant and employees representation on October 30 1998. The agreement stated that they would bring Independent Public Accountant to analyze company financial condition. During the process, all side should work on their duty. The Defendant should pay employees’ wage. The agreement was not guarantee that didn’t mean the dispute process was over, but the negotiation still moved on. During the process, there was another agreement between the defendant and several employees. They agreed the finish the disputed process and the employees would get separation pay. Meanwhile, other employees, who were 153 people didn’t agree with that agreement. Because they didn’t agree each other, so the employees gave the case to the “Panitia Penyelesaian Perselisihan Perburuhan Pusat (P4P)”.
Offers is the promise made by the offeror and it must be distinguished from invitation to treat it also has a general rule that advertisement or brochures or price list amount to invitation, it cannot be defined as a valid offer. In this case Tony as an offeror he only advertised to invite consumer to treat according to the case Partridge v Crittenden [1968] 1 WLR 1204 generally this advertisement cannot be regarded as offer and there is no promise between Tony and Emma at beginning. Even though this advertisement
In English Law consideration is one of the three main areas of an enforceable contract. It may be defined as an act, forbearance or promise made by a single party that constitutes the price for which the promise of another, is bought. In simple terms, the basic understanding of consideration may be seen as a ‘give and take’ tactic between two parties.