Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The education crisis in America
Ncaa ethical issues
Professionalism in this modern society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The education crisis in America
Deep into the nineteenth century, the United States of America industrialized rapidly. Because of this, American institutions diffused through competitive values of the marketplace. This ruthless environment attacked amateurism in American schools which was vital in collegiate sports. In 1905, The National Collegiate Athletic Association was created, which by this time, professionalism had flourished uncontrollably. As years went on, the “myth” of amateurism rose. This myth was created by the NCAA and quickly demoralized the American education. For my paper, I will support my argument by using former student-athletes Ellen J. Staurowsky and Allen Sack, who make an argument of their own in their book titled, College Athletes for Hire: The Evolution and Legacy of the NCAA's Amateur Myth that professionalism replacing amateurism has destroyed the educational value of college. Both believe the myth of being amateur began to exploit student athletes as employees to their school, because of the pressure from the NCAA to make sure schools were benefiting scholarship athletes. With both authors having their own college athletic experience, it helps support their argument towards the myth, also, stating valid points on why the NCAA has taken away the educational moral from student athletes by reminiscing on their time as athletes. Sack played football at Notre Dame, a Division I school, where everything was covered financially by the athletic department. On the other hand, Staurowsky, a female athlete, attended a small college by the name of Ursinus. She was misfortunate and received no athletic scholarships and even had to pay for traveling expenses at some points. Drawing upon the argument of Sack and Staurowsky in their book College At... ... middle of paper ... ...l of the code, major universities went shopping to buy teams that would win games. Within 1955 through 1956, colleges like Auburn, Georgia Tech, and Florida awarded over one hundred full scholarships. Works Cited Brown, Gary T. "The NCAA News - News and Features." The NCAA News: News & Features. N.p., 22 Nov. 1999. Web. 25 Nov. 2013. John R. Thelin, Games Colleges Play: Scandal and Reform in Intercollegiate Athletics (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1994), 28-31. John T. Wolohan, Book Review: College Athletes for Hire: The Evolution and Legacy of the NCAA's Amateur Myth, 10 Marq. Sports L. J. 161 (1999) Joseph K. Hart, “The Faculty Loses the Ball,” The Survey 49 ( 1 December 1922): 304. Sack, Allen L., and Ellen J. Staurowsky. College Athletes for Hire: The Evolution and Legacy of the NCAA's Amateur Myth. Westport, CT: Praeger, 1998.
This tournament, apart from entertaining students and other fans, highlights what stuff different colleges are made of. This comes at a critical time when high school seniors are considering what colleges to attend once they graduate. Thus, it is not surprising that this package of sporting events brings glad tidings to the people as it helps usher-in the beautiful spring season. However, a critical evaluation of the different teams and schools reveal the series of events -both good and not so good- that occur as they prepare for this all-important tournament.
Van Rheenen, Derek. "Exploitation in College Sports: Race, Revenue, and Educational Reward." International Review for the Sociology of Sport 48.5 (2013): 550-71. Print.
Sullivan, Robert, and Craig Neff. "Shame On You, Smu." Sports Illustrated, March 9, 1987.Article. http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/vault/article/magazine/MAG1135953/1/index.htm
Gregory, Sean. "The Real March Madness?." Time 181.11 (2013): 60. Academic Search Complete. Web. 28 Apr. 2014.
Throughout the country young men and women are losing their priority for an education. To attend a university should be a highly cherished privilege, and it should be an even greater honor to play athletics for the university. Therefore, the writer supports the decision that the “student” comes before “athlete” in student-athlete. Playing for pay should be considered a job for “professionals”. In the rulebook, the NCAA views college athletes as armatures. This statement sums it up best. When athletes go to college, not all of them go in with the mindset that athletics is going to be their future job....
Recently college athletes have been granted permission to work, from the NCAA. Even with this permission, their jobs are still regulated. One regulation to the athletes working is that they cannot work for alumni of the school. The NCAA has this rule because they feel if athletes work for people with close ties to the school then they will be receiving special benefits while working. These special benefits include, (but are not limited to), athletes being paid while not at work and higher salaries then other workers doing the same job (Anstine 4).
Pennington, Bill. "Expectations Lose to Reality of Sports Scholarships." nytimes.com. New York Times, 10 Mar. 2008. Web. 17 Dec. 2013.
Zimbalist, Andrew S. Unpaid Professionals: Commercialism And Conflict In Big-Time College Sports. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1999. eBook Collection (EBSCOhost). Web. 27 Mar. 2014.
8) Wade, Don. “Colleges: NCAA Gives Athletes a Chance—not the time—to Make Money.” Scripps Howard News Service. Nando.Net. Oct. 21, 1996 Vol. 148. NO. 19.
Brennan, Eamonn. "Men's College Basketball Nation Blog." . ESPN, 27 Aug 2012. Web. 15 Jan
Woods, Al. “College Athletes Should Be Paid.” Sports and Athletes: An Anthology. Ed. Christine Watkins. Greenhaven Press, 2009. 87-94. Print.
The proposal of payment toNCAA student-athletes has begun major conversations and arguments nationwide with people expressing their take on it. “This tension has been going on for years. It has gotten greater now because the magnitude of dollars has gotten really large” (NCAA). I am a student athlete at Nicholls State University and at first thought, I thought it would be a good idea to be able to be paid as a student-athlete.After much research however; I have come to many conclusions why the payment of athletes should not take place at the collegiate level.The payment of athletes is only for athletes at the professional level. They are experts at what they do whether it is Major League Baseball, Pro Basketball, Professional Football, or any other professional sport and they work for that franchise or company as an employee. The payment of NCAA college athletes will deteriorate the value of school to athletes, create contract disputes at both the college and professional level, kill recruiting of athletes, cause chaos over the payment of one sport versus another, and it will alter the principles set by the NCAA’s founder Theodore Roosevelt in 1906. Under Roosevelt and NCAA, athletes were put under the term of a “student-athlete” as an amateur. All student athletes who sign the NCAA papers to play college athletics agree to compete as an amateur athlete. The definition of an amateur is a person who “engages in a sport, study, or other activity for pleasure rather than for financial benefit or professional reasons” (Dictonary.com).
According to the NCAA regulations an athlete will lose his/her eligibility if they are paid to play; sign a contract with an agent; receive a salary, incentive payment, award, gratuity educational expenses or allowances; or play on a professional team. The word amateur in sports has stood for positive values compared to professional, which has had just the opposite. The professional sport has meant bad and degrading; while the amateur sport has meant good and elevating. William Geoghegan, Flyer News sports editor writes, “Would paying athletes tarnish the ideal of amateurism? Maybe, but being fair is far more important than upholding an ideal” (Geoghehan 1).
Forbes, 30 January 2014. Web. 29 April 2014. Gutting, Gary. “The Myth of the ‘Student-Athlete’.”
Power, Clark. "Athletics vs. Academics." The Huffington Post. TheHuffingtonPost.com, 14 Jan. 2014. Web. 07 Apr. 2014.