Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
challenges to implementing evidence based practice
the importance of evidence-based practice
Evidence Based Practice
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: challenges to implementing evidence based practice
Purpose The use of critical appraisal guidelines to assess the validity of research findings has received a growing increasing focused in many healthcare practiced. This idea supports the use of evidence-based practice to provide better information of which a section of research can be applied in Public Health Practiced. This paper report was set out to critically appraised a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial: titled Chloramphenicol treatment for acute infective conjunctivitis in children aged 6 months to 12 years with a clinical diagnosis of conjunctivitis in primary care. The paper will highlight the key concept of the trial as well as illustrating some limitation of the published trials. It will also focus on the aspect of proper patient selection as well as the quality of the main study. These appraisal will also outline the fundamental framework of the quality of research evidence that could be used to inform Public Health based practiced and policy program delivery. BODY Acute infective conjunctivitis is an inflammation of the conjunctiva. It is recorded as one of the most common eye problems in the primary care and account for up to 1% of GP consultation in the UK. Some of the clinical features of conjunctivitis include mild swollen eyelid and mucopurulent eye discharge (Fuloria and Kreiter, 2002). The infectious of conjunctivitis could be viral, bacteria or allergic, and diagnosis is usually made on the basis of a clinical history and examination. However, the pathophysiology of conjunctivitis is well described by (Terry Kyle) in in essentials of pediatric nursing. When virus or bacterial come in contact with palpebral conjunctiva the immune system react resulting in inflammation. In this paper appraisal th... ... middle of paper ... ... the previous 48h, or have any evidence of severe infection. However, some authors could argue that this trial it could still be applied to Public Health Practice because it is well written in scientific format and documented in accessible form to academics and practitioners which could be easily required for the people who want to applies this information. Another important aspect of the study is the benefit of the study is greater than the harms and costs because the trial present good result in terms of economic advantage to Public Health system because it can be used to reduce the number of antibiotics prescription for acute conjunctivitis in primary healthcare although an education programme is needed to provide grater knowledge and understanding in changing policy before family doctors can sensibly succeed in planning for reduction in antibiotic prescription.
Melnyk’s Hierarchy of Evidence is a system often use for assigning levels of evidence in nursing by integrates clinical expertise and patient choices with the best available research. It is represented by a pyramid that enumerates the levels of strength of the evidence from 1 to 7, of which level 1 is the higher level. The higher level on the pyramid, the more likelihood that the research is valid; therefore, answering a clinical or practice question. “The systematic review or meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials are at the top of the evidence pyramid and are typically assigned the highest level of evidence, due to the fact that the study design reduces the probability of bias” (Melnyk, 2011). The weakness of the system is that when
DiClemente (2013) stated, “Although no evaluation is perfect, evaluation research can have a high degree of rigor” (DiClemente, Salazar, & Crosby, 2013, pp. 298). The result of a high degree of rigor can lead to the utilization by program planners and policy experts which would in turn could impact public health policy and promotion practice (DiClemente et al., 2013). This is obtained by a step by step, all equally important, process in what is known as the “Nine Step Stairway to Effective Evaluation”.
Bauer AW, Kirby WMM, Sherris JC, Turck M (1966) Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing by a Standardized Single Disk Method. Am J Clin Pathol. 45:493–496.
The next stage is for the team to jointly develop an evidence-based practice standard based on the information compiled during the research process (Doody & Doody, 2011). An important concept of evidence-based practice as pointed out by Doody & Doody (2011) is the involvement of the patient in the development of new standards. The developed standard should apply to the research topic that is being addressed, however; it should also be modified from person to person based on morals and values for the standard to truly be evidence-based (Doody & Doody,
Article two entitled “Clinical trials: are they ethical?” is written by Eugene Passamani discusses the importance of randomized clinical trials. Passamani rejects the argument that the physician-patient relationship demands that physicians recommend ...
Melnyk, B. M. (2004). Integrating levels of evidence into clinical decision making. Pediatric Nursing, 30(4) 323–325.
Smith brings his 4-year-old to your office with chief complaints of right ear pain, sneezing, mild cough, and low-grade fever of 100 degrees for the last 72 hours. Today, the child is alert, cooperative, and well hydrated. You note a mildly erythemic throat with no exudate, both ears mild pink tympanic membrane with good movement, lungs clear. You diagnose an acute upper respiratory infection, probably viral in nature. Mr. Smith is states that the family is planning a trip out of town starting tomorrow and would like an antibiotic just in case.
The implementation of evidence-based programs is generally quite new in the field of medicine, and it is even more recent in the social sciences field. One point of interest in the development towards evidence-based programs was the foundation of the Food and Drug Administration that is in charge of testing the security and safety of medicinal treatments (Leff, Conley, & Hennessey, 2006). Another point of interest was in the utilization of randomized control studies. It was in 1948 that the first study occurred – examining the adequacy of streptomycin in treating tuberculosis. By the 1960s the quantity of randomized control experiments reached into the hundreds, and in the last ten (10) years there are tens of thousands happening each day (Dodge, 2006). In the field of psychology, which does not have a legislative body inspecting the adequacy of treatments, it is the obligation of those in the field to examine effective and compelling programs. It truly was not until the 1990s that this concept started to expand. The Alcohol, Drug Abuse and Mental Health Reorganization Act of 1992 assisted with the creation of the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), whose part was to help in disseminating research and viable programs/services in regards to issue practices. In 1999, the American Psychological
It is essential that when using evidence-based practice guidelines to choose a treatment, that variety of research methods are applied so that the best relevant data can be produced. Such methods include qualitative/quantitative research, randomised controlled trials and systematic reviews. Both qualitative and quantative methods produce valuable data. Quantative research produces numeric evidence that is necessary for practice and can be measured and qualitative research produces descriptive data about the subject by using patients views etc. which can also be applied to clinical practice (Broeder et al, 2010)
...e blind clinical trial conducted at thirteen different medical centers. In this trial some patients were given 1,000 mg of Meropenem every eight hours via IV while others were given 900 mg Clindamycin every 8 hours via IV. The patients receiving the Clindamycin were also being given 5mg/[kg ∙ d] of Tobramycin which was divided up over the three courses per day. When the tests were done the data on patients who met the intent to treat study criteria were available for 132 of 215 patients on Meropenem and 134 of 212 patients on the Clindamycin and Tobramycin combination. The results turned out using the group being able to be considered for evaluation, 92% of the patients on Meropenem were cured and 86% of the patients on the combination were cured (3). This study has demonstrated that the use of meropenem is safe and effective in treating intra-abdominal infections.
Liam is a previously healthy boy who has experienced rhinorrhoea, intermittent cough, and poor feeding for the past four days. His positive result of nasopharyngeal aspirate for Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) indicates that Liam has acute bronchiolitis which is a viral infection (Glasper & Richardson, 2010). “Bronchiolitis is the commonest reason for admission to hospital in the first 6 months of life. It describes a clinical syndrome of cough tachypnoea, feeding difficulties and inspiratory crackles on chest auscultation” (Fitzgerald, 2011, p.160). Bronchiolitis can cause respiratory distress and desaturation (91% in the room air) to Liam due to airway blockage; therefore the infant appears to have nasal flaring, intercostal and subcostal retractions, and tachypnoea (54 breathes/min) during breathing (Glasper & Richardson, 2010). Tachycardia (152 beats/min) could occur due to hypoxemia and compensatory mechanism for low blood pressure (74/46mmHg) (Fitzgerald, 2011; Glasper & Richardson, 2010). Moreover, Liam has fever and conjunctiva injection which could be a result of infection, as evidenced by high temperature (38.6°C) and bilateral tympanic membra...
Clinical trial is a gateway to become proved practical medical treatment, so it requires accuracy and validity of the outcomes. Placebo control trials are therefore employed in clinical trials as nearly half of academic physicians have answered in a questionnaire that they had used a placebo in their clinical trials (Sherman and Hickner, 2007). To have the higher scientific validity of results on the clinical trials require that prospective, carefully selected subjects and endpoints, a control group, randomly allocated subjects into a treatment group and a control group, blinded both subject groups and investigators, sufficient sample size, and an approved independent ethics committee and monitoring by data safety and monitor board to have stronger the scientific validity on the clinical trials (Brody, 1997). The use of placebos will enable to have more scientifically reliable outcome. However, unnecessarily or ineffectiveness of placebo use is also claimed therefore considering appropriate conditions and suitable cases would be needed for placebo use.
The importance of Evidence-Based Practice is to ensure the best possible care is provided for patients. Evidence-Based Practice functions by measuring the effectiveness of a treatment and differentiating findings between high-quality and low-quality. It also helps with health development and improves the reliability and facilitates students to become reflecti...
Accidents can often turn positive, or in some cases, they can even become revolutionary. The discovery of Penicillin changed the world immensely and it was all due to an accident one day in the lab. Penicillin changed the history of medicine for the better, saving millions of lives since its discovery. Even today, it is used by millions daily, from prescriptions from the pharmacy to life saving drugs in the hospital. However, unless something changes in the near future, history could soon reverse, and the power of penicillin could soon be diminished.
Evidence-based medicine (EBM) has been described as “the conscientious, explicit, and judicious use of current best evidence in making decision about the care of individual patients” . Evidence-Based Practice is a thoughtful integration of the best available evidence, coupled with clinical expertise. It enables one to address healthcare questions with an evaluative and qualitative approach. It is about applying the best available research evidence in provision of health, behavior and education services to enhance outcomes. Evidence-Based practice is about performing the best possible practice in order to provide the best possible care .