Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Ukraine conflict
positive impact of civil disobedience
civil disobedience impacts on society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Ukraine conflict
Civil unrest plagues many countries around the world. In the Ukraine, there is a civil unrest presenting itself requesting the government to take action on the laws of their realm or be removed from office all together. The Ukrainian government is try to come to an agreement with the United Nations assistance to change laws. Both the government of the Ukraine and the citizens of the Ukraine are becoming very impatient and fearful in the process and use a sense of liberalism, realism, and constructivism to come to a way to handle beliefs on both sides.
The citizens of the Ukraine have called for the ousting of their Prime Minister Mykola Azarov and the government according to the New York Times (Herszenhorn and Kramer 2013). The Ukrainian Parliament has refused to act on impeaching government officials while many protesters have occupied and seized the City Hall and the Cabinet of Ministers office building and have refused to allow entry by these officials. It was also noted by Herszenhorn and Kramer that there is a plan to block the presidential administration and deny entry into the Ukraine Government headquarters.
According to The New York Times, “Since the start of demonstrations on Nov. 22, many protesters, especially students, have been skeptical that elected officials would answer their demands, which were a response to Mr. Yanukovich’s decision not to sign far-reaching political and trade agreements with the European Union that had been in the works for years” (Herszenhorn and Kramer 2013). The parties that are most involved in the process of protests and include student organizations, civic organizations and a total of three radical political opposition party that are leading the demonstration at the government build...
... middle of paper ...
...y have as constructivists. Gallenmore also notes in the interview, “You just can't have international politics unless you have a set of ideas” (Gallenmore 2011). It appears the protestors have ideals that would benefit their lives and are calling for action of the government to listen to their ideals or be removed from office.
With this single civil unrest in the Ukraine, both the government and the citizens are trying to gain control of a situation of civil liberties. Both the government officials and the citizens are reverting to fear, liberalism, realism, and constructivism to avoid a civil war within the region. The government is requesting the help of the United Nations negotiations to come to a fair resolution to the law changes. The protestors are becoming impatient and are calling for the removal of Prime Minister Mykola Azarov and the government.
...h case the government will be more inclined to respond to it because of this (Robinson 1-2). With Crimea now part of Russia, perhaps the people of Ukraine can have some self-determined actions.
One of the biggest differences between the two incidences of Ukraine and the book we read would be the time periods, as well as duration of the disputes. Some say that racial injustice and oppression is still very relevant today, and of course the disagreement in the Ukraine is relevant due to the fact that it is all over the news at the moment. For the most part, black and white segregation was centered and isolated in the United States and stayed there overall. The thing about the Ukrainian struggle is that it started in Ukraine and Russia, and has stayed there, but it has a possible global ripple effect, if you will. Overall, the Ukrainian dilemma has already reached the world in terms of being aware of what i...
Very often Euromaidan is called new euro revolution, some people even compare it to Orange revolution. Obviously, these events have much in common, because it happened in one country with one nation, but still there are huge doubts can we define demonstrations and uprisings in 2013 a revolution, and what results we must expect. The following question arises: What remained the same since Orange revolution? Firstly, sociology and geography of protests : now as well as 9 years ago the majority of protesters came from Western, Central Ukraine and Kiev. The motive power hasn’t changed, students and young people are living in the main square of the country and take participation in everyday’s moves. They are supported by representatives of middle class (local residents in Kiev), which played important role during Orange revolution and became activists on December 2013. Secondly, methods of protests: the technique of putting pressure on authorities doesn’t differ so much. Protesters occupied administrative buildings. Leaders of opposition invoke people to organize actions of civil disobedience and civil resistance, try to gain support abroad and negotiate with current president and government, using Maidan like strong political argument. Lastly, the mode of protests: during both “revolutions” epicenter and fixed place of protestor’s camp is Maidan Nezalezhnosti. This is a very important strategic foothold in the center of capital. Camping in Maidan square, big headquarters, reserves of provisions and warm clothes.
During the 1800s, Ukraine was under the powerful rule of Russian tsars who dictated over the entire Russian empire. The Ukrainians were used to being held under a heavy hand though, and at this point in time, groups of men call Cossacks were gathering in numbers to fight against the outside authority over their homeland and to once and for all bring freedom to Ukraine. Nostalgia of the original Cossacks and “national revival among the Ukrainians since around 1840” became fused with “ideas of Enlightenment in the works of people like Taras Shevchenko (1814-61) and Myhailo Drahomanov (1841-95) among others” (Pavlychko Page 6).
When the population feels held down by unfair restrictions in society, religion, the economy, or the government they will try to find away to get rid of these limitations to feel equal amongst the community. Sometimes the government only worries on how the outcome will affect them in a situation and do not worry about the people’s need, which frustrates the community so they set up protest and revolts, and sometimes may even attack. In Turkey, Brazil, and Crimea all are struggling through rough times with corrupt governments. In both Crimea and Brazil the political figures are getting arrested on corrupt charges or not doing all the work that needs to be done. When government funds reveal that the money is missing from these funds because some of the cabinet members decided to take the money for their own good, it puts the community to question the
“On March 11, the Petrograd army’s troops were called out to try and stop the uprising protesters.”3 Some of the situations, soldiers started to pen fire, killing many demonstrators, but however it did not stop the strikers from leaving ...
...ty on the Black Sea peninsula. “Some Crimean Tatars denounced the proposal for autonomy as a betrayal of Ukraine. Others insisted it prevented another mass exodus and said safeguarding their right to live on the land they consider home was a priority” (Higgins, 4/02/2014). While the minority make up less than fifteen percent of Crimea’s population, it has been overwhelmingly opposed to Russia’s annexation of the peninsula. Russia claims Crimea is an inalienable part of Russia; however, Russia’s legacy of control remains for many Tatars a bitter one of trampled cultural beliefs and language, deportation, and general lack of recognition for the Crimean Tatars’ territorial rights. Russia’s unjustifiable annexation of Crimea is paved by its cultural identity, racism, and sense of place. The Crimean Tatars should not be forgotten or overlooked during the current crisis.
Aggravating the opposition is the key to civil disobedience, if you can do that without giving them a just reason to attack you, you win. All four people discussed were able to do that with avid success, and by doing so they renovated societies and made the world a better place. Once the governments back against the wall long enough they will concede when the argument is just.
Ukraine is a country in Eastern Europe, that borders Russia north and northeast. Lately Ukraine has been making international headlines; the country is in complete and total turmoil or for lack of better words a crisis. What started as a request from the Ukrainian citizens for a change in government, limit the powers of the president, restore the country constitution back to its original form from 2004-2010, and get closer ties to the EU. Peaceful protesting turned in to a nightmare, when the then president of Ukraine Viktor Yanukovych failed to make good on his word. Instead, he made a deal with Russian president and late sought refuge in Russia. A few weeks later, he was ousted from this prompted the Ukraine revolution and the annexation of Crimea also known as the Crimean crisis. A revolution in Ukraine took place in February 2014 for a period of 5 days in Kiev the capital of Ukraine, after a series of violent events in the capital culminated with the ousting of the then-President of Ukraine. Immediately following the ousting of Yanukovych, immediate changes took place in Ukraine’s sociopolitical system. Starting with the a new interim government being installed and the constitution was restored to its original state, and plans to hold impromptu presidential elections in the months to follow. Before the revolution, Ukraine had been sunken by years of corruption, mismanagement, lack of growth economically , their currency value had dropped , and they had the inability to secure funding from public markets. Because of this, president Yanukovych wanted to establish closer relationship with the European Union (EU) and Russia in order to attract the money necessary to maintain Ukraine's standard of living without a...
As the Arab Spring enters its second year, major uprisings and revolts have occurred all over the Middle East, pushing for an end to the corrupt autocratic rule and an expansion of civil liberties and political rights. Most recently, images from Syria have emerged, depicting the government’s use of force to suppress the voice of its people. One might ask, “Is this the beginning of a revolution? Is the country on the path to democracy?” To assess this question and examine the future trends in the region, one must look back on the country’s somewhat tumultuous history, the relationship between the citizens and the state, and the political economy.
The real question is how will this work out in the long term. While I do not believe that left-winged (Chavistas) will tire out and change sides, since they are the majority. It seems unlikely that the far right, violent sector of opposition will achieve its goal of forcing Maduro to resign, yet its also hard for the current government to move forward. The level of organization of the protesters here is something to admire. The protestors that are educated connected and inspired by new norms and ideas have inspired and constructed new values to other Venezuelans. Therefore, despite if the protestors get to accomplish the main idea behind the coup or not, constructivism is an important theory that can explain the outbreaks of the protests in Venezuela.
Ukraine is the largest nation to come from the former Soviet satellite states and like the rest of the former communist nations, has a large ethnic division between its citizens. To know why Ukraine is so divided and so passionate in regards to its political views we must look back to the basis of ethnic diversity throughout Ukraine’s history.
The Ukrainian crisis was a result of social upheaval against the former president, Mr. Yanukovich, who decided to pull out of the association with the European Union (BBC News, 2014). The upheaval that lasted for about two months resulted in more than 100 people killed (NY Times, 2014). In February 22 Mr. Yanukovich disappears and the opposition takes control over the government in Ukraine (BBC News, 2014). Upon learning that Mr. Yanukovich is currently residing in Kazakhstan, the new government of Ukraine requests from Kazakhstan the extradition of the overthrown president, who is accused of crime against the Ukrainian citizenry.
Freedom: something taken for granted by citizens all over the first world countries. The struggle for freedom all around the world is a very real one. Recently, the fight for freedom has taken the oppressed by storm. All over the globe, there have been many examples of people fed up with corruption and ready to take control of their lives and the lives of their children. This is evident through the struggles for freedom seen in Syria, Egypt, Tunisia, and most recently Ukraine. It’s 2014 and governments controlled by a central authority or dictator are still prevalent. Countries all over the world have been isolated and stripped of their individual voices. The struggle for freedom coexists with the struggle of finding a voice. A voice is what the Libyan people found in February of 2011 when they started protests against a regime that ruled for forty-two years in isolated dictatorship. Three years later, the very same voice that liberated them is one of the gigantic obstacles they’re facing in establishing a functioning government in the country. This emphatic voice that has been silenced for 42 years by an iron-fisted rule is now louder than ever. The consensus is that they want an operational democracy in place as soon as possible. But three years have passed, and the country is more restless than ever. The country is completely dysfunctional and there is no telling what the people will do next if a stable democratic constitution isn’t in place soon. They’ve just ousted their fourth prime minister in less than three years and casualties are increasing by the day. The current Libyan situation is widely attributed to the 2011 revolution. That being said, understanding how the 2011 revolution happened and why it unfolded the way it...
The conflict between the Ukraine and Russia is the Ukraine's most long-standing and deadly crisis; since its post-Soviet independence began as a protest against the government dropping plans to forge closer trade ties with the European Union. The conflict between Russia and the Ukraine stems from more than twenty years of weak governance, the government’s inability to promote a coherent executive branch policy, an economy dominated by oligarchs and rife with corruption, heavy reliance on Russia, and distinct differences between Ukraine's population from both Eastern and Western regions in terms of linguistics, religion and ethnicity (Lucas 2009).