Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Food Safety And Importance Of Food Hygiene And Sanitation
Pesticides and their harmful effects
6 importance of food hygiene
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Discussion
Chlorpyrifos in cattle
The mean levels of Chlorpyrifos residues in meat samples of cattle collected from north-east were non-significantly different than those collected from the south-west of Faisalabad city, 0.297 ± 0.006 ppm, and 0.373 ± 0.001 ppm, during the months of July, 2009 to December, 2009 (Table 1). These values of present study are higher than their corresponding values in literature. No difference in concentration of chlorpyrifos was observed in muscle, kidney, liver and lung of cattle during summer and winter, while Pagliuca et al. (2006) reported the progressive decrease of positive samples from Autumn to Spring and their results was confirmed by Gazzotti et al. (2008). Chlorpyrifos was found almost 15% of the analyzed samples and its detected value was many times more than the MRL value established by USFDA. In some studies conducted in milk the main pesticide pollutant was chlorpyrifos (Gazzotti et al., 2008) and its contamination ranged from 5 to 18 mg/kg. In a bioaccumulation experiments, fish meat was detected to accumulate chlorpyrifos up to 5.9 ng/g (Varo et al., 2002).
Lembda-cyhalothrin in cattle
The values of Lembda-cyhalothrin residues in cattle meat from north-east are higher than those in the meat from south-west of Faisalabad city, 4.790 ppm and 4.521 ppm, respectively (Table 1). Lembda-cyhalothrin concentration remained same during summer and winter seasons in muscle, kidney, liver and lung samples of cattle. Lembda-cyhalothrin was proportionally highest in frequency in meat as compared to other pesticides and was detected almost 25% of samples, this high frequency could be explained by its wide use as an insecticide and ectoparasite on livestock (Gazzotti et al., 2008), contrary ...
... middle of paper ...
...endosulfan than those collected from three sites in north-east of Faisalabad city.
• The residues of chlorpyrifos, cypermethrin, lambda-cyhalothrin and endosulfan in the meat of cattle remained same in summer and in winter seasons.
Recommendations:
The concentration of all pesticides residues found in the current study is alarming. The higher concentration of pesticides residues poses a potential threat to both livestock and human beings. Our data deserves a particular attention. All those products which surpass the permissible limits may be declared unhygienic for their associated toxicological risks. Both the public and private sectors must cooperate in tackling the problem jointly.
Acknowledgements:
Financial support by the Higher Education Commission Islamabad, Government of
Pakistan vide research project number 20-726 is highly acknowledged.
Añasco, N., Uno, S., Koyama, J., Matsuoka, T., Kuwahara, N. (2010): Assessment of pesticide residues in freshwater areas affected by rice paddy effluents in Southern Japan.
The pesticide DDT banned in 1987 was a detrimental to the environment leading to it to be banned in 1987. DDT remains in the soils for a long period of time. The chemicals affect the ecology of the soil and water run off causing contamination of livestock and native animals and aquatic species. Studies indicated a range of human health impacts from DDT including cancers, infertility, miscarriage and nervous system impairment. The social and economic impact of DDT use in viticulture was significant.
A growing issue in the world today is the use of antibiotics and growth hormones in the animal production industry. However, for over sixty years, Americans have been exposed to hormones on a regular basis when they consume beef. Organic Consumer Association: On average, eighty percent of all feedlot cattle are given hormones to help them grow at an increased rate. (Communication Foundation) “In 1988 the European Union banned the use of all hormone growth promoters.” (Organic Consumer Association)
This prompted a lot of study and investigations to uncover the mystery and to establish possible remedies. Among the many reasons for the causes of the CCD was the use of harmful and dangerous pesticides. Timbrell (2002) provides a solid foundation on the effects of toxins in the body of animals with an aim of providing a scientific solution towards the problem. This paper focuses its study on these pesticides with an aim of establishing the effects of the toxins found in the insecticides that could be affecting the bees. In CCD, honey bee colonies lose their workers under unclear circumstances (Cox-Foster et al., 2007, p. 283).
Every beef cattle produced is injected with steroids. With the injection of steroids it makes the cow grow at an alarming rate, and helps turn food into muscle at a quicker rate. But this is the obvious information. What are they putting into both dairy cattle and beef cattle that could cause harm to us? There is a harmful hormone called IGF. Now, this hormone is not directly put into the cattle. But, all cattle are given rBGH (to put simply it helps them produce more milk/meat). But, rBGH is directly linked to IGF, a hormone that mimics the effects of the growth of human hormones in dangerous ways. It is said that cattle containing rBGH produce 10 times to IGF than cattle without rBGH. “In a 2004 study, patients with above-average IGF levels had nearly a 50% higher risk of prostate cancer and a 65% higher risk of hormone-dependent premenopausal breast cancer than people with below-average levels.” says Carina Storrs of Health.com. Also, a lot of cattle are dosed with high amounts of antibiotics, like penicillin. It is said that a lot of the antibiotics that humans use become ineffective from being exposed to antibiotic resistant bacteria from eating beef! These are just a few of MANY drugs put into cattle. Do you see how consuming high amounts of beef could be harmful to
More precisely DON is classified as type-B trichothecene [20]. It is produced by Fusarium culmorum and F. graminearum [(Maresca, 2013). DON contamination is observed worldwide, within cereal crops such as wheat, maize or barley being most frequently affected (Richard, 2007). Furthermore, silage contamination is regularly observed (Tangni et al., 2013). Cold and wet weather conditions favour DON production (Lindblad et al., 2012) and it was found that the timing of the rainfall is more influential than the amount of precipitation (Mesterházy, 2002). In animal husbandry, DON, also known as vomitoxin, is primarily known for causing feed refusal and emesis in pigs (Pestka, 2007). This mycotoxin also alters the immune response and the intestinal functions (Pestka, 2007). DON may be produced together with two acetylated derivatives, 3-AcDON and 15-AcDON, that have differential toxicity on pig intestine (Behrens et al., 2015). Poultry are not as sensitive to DON and feed refusal is only observed at very high concentrations (16–20 mg/kg feed) (Whitlow and Hagler, 2002). Ruminants are the least sensitive animal species to DON, a fact that is attributed to the capacity of rumen microflora to detoxify this mycotoxin (Fink-Gremmels,
Some packaged meat products may contain casein as a binder so make it a habit to read the label
In the modern agriculture industry, antibiotics are regularly fed to livestock such as chicken, pigs, and cattle to increase the growth rate of these animals. The livestock industry currently feeds 70 percent of the national antibiotic supply to healthy livestock. The remaining 14 and 16 percent, respectively, are used to treat...
Saxena, M. C., Siddiqui, K.J., Agarwal, Vinita and D. Kuuty. 1983. A comparison of organochlorine insecticide contents in specimens of maternal blood, placenta, and umbilical-cord blood from stillborn and live-born cases. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health: II: 7 1 - 79.
...l production, and to expand animal agriculture research. The evidence of antibiotic resistance from sub-therapeutic antibiotics supports the need to eliminate this practice. In spite of farmers and pharmaceutical companies losing money, it is in the best interest of society to ban the practice of giving animals sub-therapeutic levels of antibiotics in their feed. Increasing the research on the effects on the environment caused by the large animal feed lots is a large epidemiologic undertaking that should be seen through. In an effort to protect antibiotics and reduce antibiotic resistance, the overall use of antibiotics should be limited to only medically significant situations, drugs should be used more selectively, better sanitation practices should be used throughout the production process, and the enforcement of bans and limitations must be followed through.
However, health concerned organizations want to ban the use of these products due to the increasing fears that they can cause harm to the consumers. For over 50 years, antibiotics have been added to the food of animals such as poultry, cattle and pigs. The main purpose for doing so is to lower the risk of disease in animals. Farm animals are housed together in overcrowded areas, which are very dirty. The hygiene level can get to such a poor state that they are often in contact with their own excreta as well as excreta of the other animals they are housed with and because of tight single air space they share, the likelihood of catching diseases from one another is further increased and very often a whole heard can be infected at one time.
Over the years, meat eating has grown dramatically in many countries. Demand for meat production increased at a fearsome speed, which led to producers using pesticides and fertilizers on their crop. Because of our exponential population we could not begin to feed the population of the world without them. Farmers will need to increase the amount the chemicals used on their crops and animals to accelerate production process i...
Agriculture is the most fundamental resource of society. Without it, humans could not live, especially in the ways we do now where people reside in cities. This means that those cities could not exist without large scale agriculture to sustain them. Since agriculture is such a necessity, people have developed methods to gain more from their land. One of the many solutions besides machinery they have developed to produce higher crop yields is through the use of pesticides. However, those pesticides which have resulted in high crop yields have come at price, and that is human health itself. This seems rather contradictory. Pesticides were designed to help people and society by increased the success of producing high crop yields, and they still do that, but at the same time, those same pesticides have caused unforeseen health risks, primarily to those have had to handle them. The average person would not consider pesticides as being a cause for depression, or in worst case scenario, suicide, but studies have found significant links. Even though California is just one place in the world, it has large agricultural areas which were, and still are, represented in many scientific studies that have found those unforeseen risks from pesticide use. Since pesticides are poisons, producers and safety activities urge several safety precautions to attempt to reduce the effect on human users. However, these precautions sometimes do not prevent long term damages in the people that live and work in such close proximity, which are the agricultural workers. Since the risk are known, policies have been put into place, but despite that, the use of pesticides remains high. Like many of the anthropological readings from this course, there are also added ...
Scheer, Roddy, and Doug Moss. “How does Meat in the Diet Take an Environmental Toll?” Scientific American. ScientificAmerican.com, 28 Dec. 2011. Web. 3 Apr. 2014.
"Pesticides." Issues & Controversies On File: n. pag. Issues & Controversies. Facts On File News Services, 18 July 2005. Web. 20 May 2011. .