How important was chivalry in molding the cultural world of the upper classes?
The word chivalry comes from the French term “chevalrie” which when literally described meant the warrior attributes of armed knights on horseback. When the word was first used it did not have many, if any, of the moral or social aspects with which were later attributed to it. Reaching the later periods of the Middle Ages there begins to be a consensus opinion on the definition of a chivalrous knight. This knight would be polite, especially to women, loyal to his lord, a devout and humble Christian, and a powerful and strong-willed fighter. While no man could live up to these expectations, an ideal chivalrous knight would demonstrate all of these qualities. Chivalry would begin to fade in the 15th century following the unrealistic disposition of courtly love. From the beginning of the Crusades to this point however, chivalry was not only an important part of the cultural world of the upper classes it would come to define it. Indeed, many of the major parts of life in the Middle Ages including warfare, religion, ceremonies and romance were significantly affected by chivalry. These key aspects of life which chivalry impacted would define the cultural world of the upper classes throughout Europe.
Chivalry, in its most all-encompassing definition, can be described as “a form of behavior knights and nobles would have liked to imaged they followed, both based on and reflected in the epics and romances, a form of behavior which took armed and mounted combat as one of its key elements.” This definition opens many doors as to a true depiction of chivalry; however it is efficient at enabling discussion of chivalry from almost every medieval source. It is jus...
... middle of paper ...
...er class during the Middle Ages. Without chivalry, some of the most important cultural events of the Middle Ages may never have occurred including the Crusades and tournaments, among others.
Bibliography
Primary Sources
Gerard J. Brault. The Song of Roland. Penn State Press: USA, 1974.
Kay, Sarah. Raoul de Cambrai. Oxford University Press: USA, 1992.
Secondary Sources
Bouchard, Constance Brittain. Strong of Body, Brave & Noble: Chivalry & Society in Medieval
France. Cornell University Press: USA, 1998.
Gautier, Leon. Chivalry. Phoenix House: London, 1965.
Lawson, Rich. Shadowed Realm. “Chivalry during the reign of King Edward III.”
http://www.shadowedrealm.com/articles/exclusive/chivalry_king_edward_iii_reign
(Accessed 11/25/2009).
Saul, Nigel. Age of Chivalry: Art and Society in Late Medieval England. Collins & Brown Limited:
Great Britain, 1992.
Life during the Middle Ages was full of social change, division, and classism. This feudal society of Britain was divided into three estates. (social classes) Within the second estate was the the knight who was a soldier for the king who fought in many battles. Even though the knight is expected to have the strength and the skills to fight in battle, all knights during the Medieval period additionally had a chivalrous aspect to them. Chivalry was the honor code of a knight which included bravery, courtesy, honor, and gallantry toward women. Within the stories of the “Wife of Bath’s Tale” and “Le Morte d’Arthur”, the code of chivalry was broken by knights which show the corruption of England’s feudal society.
Thomas Malory’s Le Morte D’arthur, T.H. White’s Once and Future King, and George Romero’s Knightriders encompass the evolution of the Arthurian tale from Malory’s time to the 1980s. Through this time many things have changed and these changes can be seen within the differences between each work. While there are many prominent differences chivalry or the knightly code is one of the main forces that tie these tales together. Malory reworks many of his sources to bring attention to the grand fellowship of Arthur’s Round Table and the chivalry that holds the knights together. Malory idealizes the power of chivalry and gives a great importance to it throughout his text. Unlike Malory, White does not idealize chivalry, but he does see the good and honorable aspects of chivalry. From Sprague Kurth’s article, “Conclusion,” it is clear to see that White gives his text an anti-war stance and shows chivalry and the controlling moral compass of Arthur’s knights. Chivalry is once again idealized in George Romero’s Knightriders the situations within the film are modernized but the emotions and illusions remain the same. T.H. White is directly referenced within the film and Malory’s idealization of the glory of chivalry can once again be seen. In my essay, I will show how chivalry is used in all the texts above as a bonding agent between all Arthurian knights. As Arthur’s knights honor and respect chivalry they remain as one cohesive group, but once they begin to abandon chivalry the Round Table begins to crumble and chaos ensues.
Richard Barber first published The Knight and Chivalry in 1970. At the time, not a whole lot had been written on the subject of chivalry. Thus, Barber can be viewed is sort of an original scholarly writer on this subject matter. His work is extensive. In this particular book he covers the following concepts: the transition of the Knight from mounted warrior, chivalry and literature, chivalry in the field, chivalry in religion, and finally, chivalry in the state. All five parts present pages of rich text. However, I will be dealing specifically on the concept of chivalry and literature. My reason is this: to the reading it was done in MDVL 145, heroes and villains, I am more inclined to look at the author’s own ideas in relation to other literature circa the 12th century, in a critical manner. Thus the purpose.
One must first understand the meaning of these medieval qualities, in order to then succeed in examining Tolkien’s use of them in The Lord of the Rings. Chivalry, to begin, is described by Maurice Keen, the author of the undisputed “last word” on the subject, as “a word that came to denote the code and culture of a martial estate which regarded war as its hereditary profession” (239); this is not, however, all that Keen be...
The Lais of Marie de France, particularly “Bisclavret”, “Laustic”, and “Lanval”, interact with the chivalric code in varying ways. Honor, valiance, and courtly love are all included in the overall umbrella of chivalry, as are heightened moral expectations. Through storytelling, Marie de France calls into question the existence of true chivalry in knights, and investigates the effects of greed, lust, and anger when placed in powerful hands. “Bisclavret” reveals that motives of personal gain can be present and empowered in knighthood, “Laustic” juxtaposes two knights of opposite civil stature to express that some individuals do indeed possess chivalry, and “Lanval” represents the idea that even the pure of heart cannot escape the evil present
The epic poem, “The Lay of the Nibelungs” (1200’s), set to practice the major pillars in the code of chivalry that the Duke of Burgundy in the 14th century eventually condensed and ascribed to the Burgundian Knights: Faith, Charity, Justice, Sagacity, Prudence, Temperance, Resolution, Truth, Liberality, Diligence, Hope, and Valor. Though values bear merit, “The Lay of the Nibelungs” teaches that true worth and longevity comes from assessing the situation and applying intellect to the code, from submitting to God, and from not cheating the system (the laws and cultural norms of the time that be).
Throughout medieval times, proper manners were an influential part of people’s daily lives. Men, in particular, were often called upon to be protective and were expected to treat others with dignity. This highly regarded standard originated in 1170 AD when the concept of chivalry developed, which became an esteemed tradition especially among knights. A code of conduct was implemented for the appointed knights that outlined the core values of knighthood. Despite their occasional shortcomings, knights were viewed with a high status and were well known as respectful people. Eligible candidates for knighthood participated in dubbing ceremonies, which became a way for them to demonstrate their chivalric principles, affirm their hard work, and declare their worthiness. The Middle Ages in Europe established a civilized class of knights through an explicit code of conduct, elevated their rank in society, and acknowledged their emergence through dubbing ceremonies.
Though the Knight and the Squire are from the same feudal class and vocation, they differ in the fact that the Knight represents how society should have been; and the Squire depicts an accurate portrayal of how it actually was.Chivalry, heroism, and modesty delineate the Knight, whose upright standards and principles illustrate a true gentleman; these characteristics are not evident in the Squire. Even though the Knight has won many wars, he is careful not to brag about his ctories. The most recurrent point in the description of the Knight is the abundance and importance of his conquests; however, the Squire's battles are barely mentioned. While the entirety of the Squire's battles are summed up in two lines ("he had se some service with the cavalry / In Flanders and Artois and Picardy"), the list of the Knight's battles dominates his description (Chaucer 120). The Squire's battles are not fought in the interest of his chivalry. On the...
Chivalry was a big part of this fourteenth century and it was embodied throughout the men of king Arthurs round table. In General, Chivalry was a set of religious values and moral goals that medieval knights
The code of chivalry is a set of rules followed by the knights during the middle ages. The evolution of heroic and chivalry code has changed over time beginning from the Middle ages to now. The three stories Sir Gawain and the Green Knight, Lanval and Beowulf illustrate what it takes to be considered a chivalrous knight. In Sir Gawain and the Green Knight, Gawain shows qualities
Closely associated to the romance tradition are two idealized standards of behavior, especially for knights: courage and chivalry. The protagonist within many medieval romances proved their worth by going on quests, as many a knights went in those times, thus returning with great tales of their travels and deeds. Many modern people think of chivalry as referring to a man's gallant treatment of women, and although that sense is derived from the medieval chivalric ideal, chivalry could be seen as more than that. Knights were expected to be brave, loyal, and honorable-sent to protect the weak, be noble to...
During The Middle Ages, there was a lack of central government, so in order to keep the peace; Medieval Europe was required to create their own. Within this new government, there were four main socials classes; known as Kings, Nobles, Knights, and Peasants. They were all critical parts of the society, but one group specifically was the most essential to the feudal system, and they were the knights. During this Era, they were required to Abide by a Code of Chivalry in order to be sworn in as a knight. In Sir Thomas Malory’s Le Morte D’Arthur Sir Lancelot is one of the main knights of King Arthur. By examining Sir Lancelot’s desire for peace, reluctance to shed Christian blood, and devotion towards King Arthur, his courageous and heroic qualities, it is clear that he is the epitome of an honorable knight.
Chivalry, or the chivalrous code, is a code of conduct covered with the medieval institution of knighthood from which the western idea of good manners developed. It means that people sacrifice or give up something they have then achieve some specific purpose. People like to praise this spirit, but not everyone is willing to do so. This spirit can be traced back to the song of Roland 1100 C.E. Roland, a Frankish military leader under Charlemagne, made an arrogant decision in not choosing to blow the horn to signal Charlemagne’s troops to his aid. He thought his death was the result of his loyalty to his lord, even though Oliver, Roland’s best friend and brother-in-law, argued about Roland’s command decision and advised probably would have saved
In today’s society the differences in morals between the rich and the poorer classes are virtually non-existent, but during Medieval times “morals and, above all, the virtues at its center, played an important role not only for distinguishing between good and bad, but, more importantly, even for the structuring of society” (Virtus 1). The aristocracy class and the immoral poor class had morals but how they demonstrated them varied; the aristocratic class used chivalry as the basis of their morals, while the immoral poor class did not. Chivalry was not only a code of conduct for those who followed it; chivalry was a way of life. ‘Chivalry first arose in Europe during the Crusades.
Do you remember as a kid you dressing up as a knight, imagining saving someone from a castle from a dragon? Haven’t you always been fascinated by the image of the "Knight in shining armor?" Who hasn't wondered what it was really like to live the life of a knight? Sadly real knights from the Middle Ages aren’t about rescuing people from dragons. This guide will teach you all about how to be a successful knight in European history, the Middle Ages, or Medieval period, lasted from the 5th to the 15th century. It began with the collapse of the Western Roman Empire and merged into the Renaissance and the Age of Discovery. A knight was a male warrior during Medieval Times that served a lord under the code of chivalry, much like samurai with their code of bushido. This code made knights follow a set a rules, and described qualities they should possess. (Hopkins, Knights) For example he is to be fearless and valiant while having qualities such as being loyal, generous, and polite. Women couldn’t become knights because the only purpose they had at that time was: to marry well, be loyal to their husband, and to have sons. (Edge, Arms & Armor of the Medieval Knight) stated that