Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Effects of technology on modern society
Effects of technology on modern society
Effect of technology on society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Effects of technology on modern society
Society today relies on technology for far too many things that are not necessary. Instead of human contact and face to face interactions and communication that have been used since the beginning of human existence it has become strictly email and networking based communication. There is no human contact that reinsures an individual that they have the support and love that accompanies the Greek term Philia, meaning friend. Without that human contact that should come with friendship it is unsure to which the intent of the context is suppose to be interoperated. Technology becoming increasingly more manipulative in its uses diminishes the conception of Philia, unaware of whether or not it is genuine or falsely recognized. The use of technology in regards to friendship is not all negative there are some positives, but it continuously blurs the lines of what friendship is or is not thus resulting in devastation that is caused similarly by a chimera within Greek Mythology. Philia as understood by the Greeks ceases to exist, it is no longer represented by emotions but rather emoticons, and technology morphs its understandings from physical to platonic. “The idea of friendship in ancient times could not have been more different. Achilles and Patroclus, David and Jonathan, Virgil’s Nisus and Euryalus: Far from being ordinary and universal, friendship, for the ancients, was rare, previous, and hard-won” (Deresiewicz 2009, 2). True friendship encompasses depth and love to which one cannot receive through a computer screen but its accessibility allows for immediate and accessible communication.
Technology, specifically social networking websites like Facebook, MySpace, Twitter and many others contribute to a certain type of effective comm...
... middle of paper ...
...has been manipulated countless times leaving little recognition to the truth that the Greeks had established. Thanks to technology the true meaning of friendship has been lost with too many clicks of the ‘accept friend’ request.
Works Cited
Deresiewicz, William. "Faux Friendship." Chronicle of Higher Education 56, no. 16 (2009).
Heller, Agnes. "The Beauty of Friendship." The South Atlantic Quarterly, 1998: 4-22.
Marshall, Michael. "Facebook is good for you." Vol. 201. no. 2698. March 7, 2009.
Pashenkov, Ann. "Facebook doesn't kill friendships, people do." Christian Science Monitor ,
2009: 9.
Simpson, Michael. Gods and Heros of the Greeks: The Library of Apollodorus. Amherst:
University of Massachusetts Press, 1976.
Weimann, Gabriel. "Terror on Facebook, Twitter, and Youtube." The Brown Journal of World
Affairs 16, no. 2 (2010): 45-54.
5). By never losing touch with acquaintances made throughout life, we lose what has made “good old-fashioned” losing touch so good (para. 5). We lose real friendships and “long-forgotten photos and mixtapes” (para. 5). Without these natural aspects that are so important to friendship, friends have not only lost their worth, but the whole point of a friendship has been lost as well. Arguing that losing touch is a necessity of friendship, Brown suggests that maybe the issue could be resolved if only social networks would create a “Fade Utility” app that would allow unintended friends to gradually blur into a sepia cast, similar to the way unintended friends naturally fade away from our lives (para. 6). Maybe if networks treated friendships the way nature does, providing opportunities for people to reach out to lost friends if they choose, then online friendships might hold the same meaning as natural friendships, where the title “friend” is not just a banner of status, but a position in a
The article “Faux friendship”, written by William Deresiewicz, explains the influence social media has had on the structure of friendship over the years. In the article states, that in this day in age friendships are so common and under looked that we are essentially friends with everyone. Deresiewicz believes that, with the introduction of social media sites such as, face book, my space, and twitter, people seem to value the number of “friends” they have rather than the quality of their few intimate friendships. Deresiewicz explains that, in ancient times friendships were drastically different. He applauds friendships like that of Achilles and Patrodus, David and Jonathan, Virgil Nisus and Euryalus stating that they were unordinary, but universal,
In examining Aristotle, Cicero, Montaigne, and Emerson’s views on friendship, one can see how the meaning of friendship has evolved through time and see the respective perceptions of friendship exemplify the cultural values of the writers. Aristotle took on a somewhat elitist viewpoint on friendship due to Athenian society’s social hierarchy; Cicero takes on a more realistic one because the politics of Roman friendships; Montaigne adopts a more modern interpretation of friendship as time has progressed and finally Emerson’s transcendental beliefs are shown in his writings about friendship. However, it is uncanny that despite the span of time and cultures, all agree on the profound importance of friendship for individuals.
Late one evening, curled up in her nest, Harriet lay thoughtfully reading the last of Aristotle’s model of friendships: the perfect friendship. Though no secret to Harriet, Aristotle presents the idea that it is the most desirable and genuine of the three forms. The foundation of this friendship is not trivial, but instead the relationship is built on a common good and virtuous nature. As Aristotle explains, “those who love for the sake of utility love for the sake of what is good for themselves, and those who love for the sake of pleasure do so for the sake of what is pleasant to themselves.” Aristotle continues, “Perfect friendship is the friendship of men who are good, and alike in virtue; for those wish well alike to each other qua good, and they are good in themselves.” (concluding sentence or two...)
Friendship is undoubtedly one of the most important elements in the books of Aristotle’s ethical principles. Aristotle takes the idea of friendship to a serious degree. He categorizes them into three groups or types of friendships. This report will attempt to define each type of friendship as well as identify the role of friendship in a society.
Alex Pattakos used Aristotle to explain the value of friendships several times in his article, “The Meaning of Friendship in a Social-Networked World”. Aristotle said that friendship was like “a single soul living in two bodies” (210); a thought that contrasted quite a bit from the movie The Social Network. Pattakos used the popular movie to assess the effect of social media in friendships. He described our lives as now having five-hundred friends, meaning more of a quantity than good quality friendships. Pattakos believes that as a society we have drifted away from friendships and the sense of community. He also believes that we would rather talk to random strangers because as a society we have lost the will to work towards close friendships.
It is strange to label any friendship a success or a failure; it is stranger still to call the friendship between Achilleus and Patroklos a failure, especially when it has long been celebrated as one of the greatest friendships in antiquity. After all, friendship is called a success when friends remain just that, and a failure when they part ways with diffidence. How else could we possibly judge friendship? I suggest, however, that the good of the friend is the end of true friendship, and that this principle can guide critical inquiry into the nature of friendship. The basis of this statement is Aristotelian. The Nicomachean Ethics defines true friendship as the mutual appreciation of the intrinsic good in the other, and the desire to will the other’s good. The critique of true friendship, in Aristotelian terms, should consider not only whether the parties loved each other for their intrinsic good, but also the extent to which they were successful at promoting the good of the other. The tragedy of Achilleus and Patroklos is that, despite their love and desire to promote the good of the other, they may have ultimately failed. Their friendship may have failed not because of a lack of good will or capability, but because of the conflicting obligations placed upon that friendship by society, circumstance, and the unyielding character of Achilleus.
First, the article introduces the audience to friendships described by Aristotle, and Todd May. In the text it states, “It is threatened when we are encouraged to look up on those
In Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics, he distinguishes three types of friendships; utility, pleasure, and complete, of which corresponds to a particular type of good either coming from or residing in the friend. Aristotle states that friendships of utility and pleasure are defective, and that a complete friendship is the closest to perfection. Throughout all of the friendships each individual must be aware of the purpose of the relationship. In addition, friendship improves virtues such as modesty, and as a result enhances eudemonia.
At first glance, the gadgets and gizmos that today’s society has so readily integrated into our personal lives may be considered a godsend. It’s fast working, requires minimal effort to use, and does a lot of our daily tasks for us. Another one of the main advantages of possessing such technology is that we have the ability to connect with friends all over the globe. While this constant connection may seem beneficial, a large gap lies between simply connecting and actually communicating. Ultimately, the time we spend absorbed in our virtual worlds damages our ability to talk to our friends face to face. We lose social skills as we use social media. In the mysterious murder of friendship, technology is the main suspect.
Communication plays an important role and becomes an essential part in our daily lives. Today we have taken communication to new level as social media and social networking. They have had a tremendous impacts on the word, on our culture and in business as well. Social media websites are some of the most popular on the internet, such as Facebook, Twitter, Youtube, etc. They are the places where people can interact with others easily and expose themselves to strangers. Our generation and the younger ones have more opportunities to grow up with the new development of technology that will shape the way they live of communicating and sharing ideas. The social media causes some problems that lead to less social interaction and negatively affect students academic, but it also brings benefit to people that creates new social connections to bring people from all over the world to be closer.
Ten years ago, if you were to ask a random person on the street how many friends they had, they probably would have thought a short while and told you anywhere from 5 to 20 people in their lives were considered friends. Ask an average college-age person today, and the answer might very well be several hundred. The term ‘friend’ has taken on a whole new meaning thanks to the advent of social networking technology, and the degree to which our culture is now connected to the internet. Computers were just the beginning of our layers of connections. Cell phones, video game systems, and even TV’s are now wired into the net. Connecting to friends and loved ones who are located a world away is now instantaneous thanks to email, instant messaging, and web-cam programs like Skype. The past decade has certainly seen society become much more tech-savvy and electronically linked.
Writing is one of the oldest forms of communication. It started back as cave drawings and has evolved into so many different forms. As technology changes, our communication strategies are changing as well. Business Communications has always been affected by the changes in our environment, but the digital age has increased the efficiency, speed, and simplicity of the way we communicate.
“We barely have time to pause and reflect these days on how far communicating through technology has progressed. Without even taking a deep breath, we’ve transitioned from email to chat to blogs to social networks and more recently to twitter” (Alan 2007). Communicating with technology has changed in many different ways. We usually “get in touch” with people through technology rather than speaking with them face to face. The most popular way people discuss things, with another individual, is through our phones. Phones have been around way before I was born in 1996, but throughout the years, they have developed a phone called a “smart phone”. The smart phone has all kinds of new things that we can use to socialize with our peers. On these new phones, we can connect with our friends or family on social networking sites such as Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram. Technology has also developed Skype, a place you can talk with people on the computer with instant voice and video for hours. The new communication changes have changed drastically from the new advances made in technology through our smart phones, social networking sites, and Skype.
People in the present society have turned from the use of the old means of communication to the more advanced and technological ways of communicating. Technology has made it easier for people to communicate in a faster, efficient, and cost saving means through the introduction of the communication channels. The world has turned out to be the centre for technology with different technologies emerging daily as the people continue to develop from time to time to cope with the growing technology. The benefits of adopting the communication technology are explained in this article which shows why people do not function without technology.