We can conclude that different cultures have different moral codes. What is right for one society could be unmoral for another society; the moral code for one society establishes what is right for only that society, we cannot assume that the moral code upholds to every society. Since, every society has different moral codes, then we should be ...
... middle of paper ...
...nd an Irish funeral will be significantly different. In a typical Muslim funeral, the dead is mourned, their life is not celebrated, and people attending the funeral will wear all black. However, in an Irish funeral the dead’s life is celebrated for the deceased’s accomplishments. Yes, the funeral practices are possibly completely different, but there is one goal both groups strive for which is honoring of the dead. Being tolerant and open-minded allows you to have the capability to learn more about different cultures. If a society is not tolerant about other moral codes, this could possibly lead to wars. Tolerance is needed to have a civilization. For example, if your neighbor has different values than you, would you burn down his house because his values differ? If we are not tolerant of each other’s values than we risk the consequence of being at war all the time.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- Cultural Relativism is a perspective that moral codes vary from culture to culture, no moral code within in a culture is superior to the other codes in different cultures; This ideology comes from there is no universal truth, meaning there is no philosophical standard that determines if something is either right or wrong, therefore one cannot establish that something is “better.” In “The Challenge of Cultural Relativism,” James Rachels introduces the topic by introducing Darius whom is a king of ancient Persia.... [tags: Morality, Ethics, Human, Culture]
872 words (2.5 pages)
- The Challenge of Cultural Relativism Argument The Challenge of Culture Relativism written by James Rachels argues the downsides and upsides to the idea of Cultural Relativism. This is the idea of Cultural Relativism: the principle that an individual human 's beliefs and activities should be understood by others in terms of that individual 's own culture. It was established as axiomatic in anthropological research by Franz Boas in the first few decades of the 20th century and later popularized by his students.... [tags: Culture, United States, Anthropology]
993 words (2.8 pages)
- In this paper I will argue that cultural relativism is a weak argument. Cultural relativism is the theory that all ethical and moral claims are relative to culture and custom (Rachels, 56). Pertaining to that definition, I will present the idea that cultural relativism is flawed in the sense that it states that there is no universal standard of moral and ethical values. First, I will suggest that cultural relativism underestimates similarities between cultures. Second, I will use the overestimating differences perspective to explain the importance of understanding context, intention and purpose behind an act.... [tags: Morality, Cultural relativism, Culture, Ethics]
900 words (2.6 pages)
- Cultural Relativism Cultural Relativism is the theory that ethical and moral standards are based on what a particular society deems to be good or bad. Since different societies have different beliefs, cultural relativists believe there are many moral codes in the world. Cultural relativists believe there is no universal moral code, which is an independent standard that defines what is right or wrong all of the time, regardless of place. There are many different examples of Cultural Relativism in society.... [tags: Morality, Cultural relativism, Culture]
1275 words (3.6 pages)
- Consequentialism is a moral theory which is founded on the premise that an action is morally right if the outcomes of such actions maximize the good and minimize the bad. In contrast, Non-consequentialism is derived from the premise that some actions are inherently right or wrong. As these theories can derive either identical or varied conclusions in morally ambiguous situations, the conclusions in themselves, while important, can not be considered evidence for the theory’s value. Hence, as we can only judge a theories value by its premise, I will argue that consequentialism is derived from a sound premise, while non-consequentialism is based on an unfounded assertion.... [tags: morality, ethics, consequentialism]
1578 words (4.5 pages)
- Weigh Prinz’s argument for moral relativism against the anti-relativist arguments put by James Rachel in “The Challenge of Cultural Relativism.” Explain both philosophers cases. Which argument is stronger in your view and why. Defend your answer. From a young age, people question whether they are morally right about things all around them. Have our morals been taught to us from a young age. Do they truly exist are are they a norm imposed to people by society. Does morality really exist or is it just a creation of our imagination.... [tags: Morality, Ethics, Cultural relativism]
1470 words (4.2 pages)
- In the essay “The Morality of Euthanasia”, James Rachels uses what he calls the argument from mercy. Rachels states, “If one could end the suffering of another being—the kind from which we ourselves would recoil, about which we would refuse to read or imagine—wouldn’t one?” He cites a Stewart Alsop’s story in which he shares a room with a terminally ill cancer patient who he named Jack. At the end of the recounting, Alsop basically asks, “were this another animal, would not we see to it that it doesn’t suffer more than it should?” Which opens up the question of, “Why do humans receive special treatment when we too are animals?” We would not let animals suffer when there is a low chance of s... [tags: Morality, Utilitarianism, Ethics, Religion]
703 words (2 pages)
- “Questioning My Beliefs” As a Christian raised in a Southern Baptist church, I have always been taught and believed without questioning, that the soul is the part of me that makes me who I am. It is my personality, my thoughts and emotions, and my identity. Without my soul, I would be lifeless, like a light bulb without electricity. At death, according to my beliefs, the soul survives, separates from the body, and proceeds to its destination--heaven or hell. I have questioned this pre-held belief after reading James Rachels argument against the immortal soul.... [tags: Soul, Life, Immortality, God]
1110 words (3.2 pages)
- Culture Relativism; what is it. Culture Relativism states that we cannot absolute say what is right and what is wrong because it all depends in the society we live in. James Rachels however, does not believe that we cannot absolute know that there is no right and wrong for the mere reason that cultures are different. Rachels as well believes that “certain basic values are common to all cultures.” I agree with Rachels in that culture relativism cannot assure us that there is no knowledge of what is right or wrong.... [tags: values, ethics, religion]
957 words (2.7 pages)
- James Rachels believes that active and passive euthanasia are not morally different from each other (Timmons, 2007, p.346). He uses the cases of Smith and Jones to argue against those that believe active euthanasia, the act killing someone, is morally worse than passive euthanasia, the act of letting some one die (Timmons, 2007, p.347). In the case of Smith and Jones, both of the men will acquire a large inheritance if anything were to happen to their six-year-cousins (Timmons, 2007, p.347-348).... [tags: Death, Euthanasia, Morality, Homicide]
1097 words (3.1 pages)