According to the lecture and Adler & Adler, the Structural Functionalist perspective is the theory that institutional breakdown can result in the increase of crime due to failing in the promotion of core societal values and failing in the socialization of the people within the institution. Within this perspective, there are several sub-arguments that can be used to understand why the boys were at Central Park and why the police interrogated them as they did. These sub-arguments include: the role of institutions, the creation of deviant subcultures, change of norms, importance of goals, and overlook of core values. In 1989, the city was in a huge economic crisis. Times such as this often provoke high crime rates due to strain in social processes. It was even stated in the movie that muggings had to seem to be the new norm and the amount of “crack wars” were increasing. Also, because of the economic crisis many of the regular institutions we unreliable; in poorer areas the school system was breaking down and the political institutions did not seem to be working. This breakdown allows for a deviant subculture to emerge within Harlem. This devi...
... middle of paper ...
... Finally, when the men were exonerated, the media barely covered it. The news was no longer about showing the lower-class where they belonged. Anything that could be covered after the exoneration would only be at the fault of the upper-class. As Steven Wilder stated, “Their innocence never got the attention that their guilt did.” As the Conflict Perspective proves, it was no longer helpful for the upper-class to use the media as an outlet for the case, so the media attention lessened.
The injustices that occurred in The Central Park Five are easily explained by three different theoretical perspectives: the Structural Functionalist Perspective, the Symbolic Interactionist Perspective, and the Conflict Perspective. These perspectives prove that the economic crisis of this time had an enormous effect on the separation of the city and the consequences that would follow.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- The Marxist and Functionalist Perspectives on the Family For the purpose of this essay question I will discuss the Marxist and the Functionalist perspectives on the Family. I will compare and contrast them and give a critical analysis of each and place them in historical context as well as modern day. In Britain today there are many different types of families. A social unit living together defines what a family is. The family resembles the core feature of society. Both Marxist and Functionalist perspectives believe the family is what holds society together and helps socialise the future generations.... [tags: Papers Families Society Marxism Functionalism ]
1075 words (3.1 pages)
- ... In fact, the institutions one belongs to can change quite frequently. “The functionalist perspective emphasizes the interconnectedness of society by focusing on how each part influences and is influenced by other parts” (Mooney, Knox, & Schacht, 2007). Spencer’s writings and development of theories influenced Emile Durkheim, who began to apply these same theories to his own works. While trying to determine how societies can change and survive over time, Durkheim wrote: “society is a complex system of interrelated and interdependent parts that work together to maintain stability” (Openstax, p.... [tags: Sociology, Structural functionalism]
992 words (2.8 pages)
- ... Adding to the theory, he said that when every part of society is doing their functions then society is in a “normal” state. On the opposing side, when the pieces of society are not functioning how they should, the society is in an “abnormal” state. There are some core institutions that are used to help understand this theory such as family, government, education, and religion. According to the theory these institutions only exist because they play a vital role in the functioning of a society.... [tags: Sociology, Structural functionalism]
773 words (2.2 pages)
- Numerous social theories emerged to explain the relationship between societal function and the human condition during the 19th and 20th centuries. Deeply embedded within the social experiences and predicaments of prominent theorists, the perspectives and priorities understood to be significant indications of society’s inner workings varied tremendously. These theories developed a specific view point on the importance of ideals such as culture, production, structure, language, and individualism within society.... [tags: Sociology, Max Weber, Structural functionalism]
1583 words (4.5 pages)
- For as long as I could remember, African Americans have succumbed to some of the cruelest treatment seen in America’s history. This mistreatment has taken on many forms particularly in respect to social and racial discrimination. Examples of prior struggles for equality of African Americans in America may include: the pursuit of their freedom and equal treatment that was attributed by slavery, attaining voting rights, and being able to secure a job that would not discriminate based solely on their skin color.... [tags: racism, segregation, perspective]
940 words (2.7 pages)
- In social science, Functionalism is the theory that put pressure on the dependence of the patterns and institutions of our society and her interaction by preserving her cultural and society unity. In Sociology, functionalism came from the sociologist EMILE DURKHEIM, who viewed our society as a sort of “ORGANISM” that brings with it certain “needs” that must be complete. The American sociologist Talcott Parsons analysed very extensive societies with regards to their social order, integration and stability.... [tags: Functionalism]
643 words (1.8 pages)
- There are three major theoretical perspectives that make up society: structural functionalism, conflict theory, and symbolic interactionism. However, everyone views the world differently; it is vital to know the different theoretical perspectives in order to understand how society functions as a whole. The first theoretical perspective is structural functionalism. Structural functionalism is a macro-level theory that “views a society as a complete unit” ( Larkin, Ch.2 ). Society is seen as a system of interaction, where everyone has their own role (Harpercollins).... [tags: Sociology, Structural functionalism]
1082 words (3.1 pages)
- What are conflict and functionalist perspectives. The conflict perspective is “the sociological approach that views groups in society as engaged in a continuous power struggle for control of scarce resources” (Kendall, 25). These conflicts can result in forms such as politics and negotiations. Most conflicts form with discussion of family financial situations, due to the lack of resources (Kendall, 25). The functionalist perspective is defined as, “perspectives are based on the assumption that society is a stable, orderly system (Kendall, 23).... [tags: Sociology, Structural functionalism]
910 words (2.6 pages)
- ... Elements of society are considered to be “functional” if they bring positive stability such as the list above, however they are considered “dysfunctional” if they disrupt society. An example that describes the relationship of elements to create society is comparing the function of a cell. A cell is made up of different parts such as a nucleus, a cell membrane, ribosomes, and vacuoles; each section having a different function or job that feeds off of each other in order for the cell to work. Emile Durkheim was a main contributor to this view on society by stating that “interdependent parts contribute to the survival of the system of society.” Conflict Perspective looks at society as being... [tags: Sociology, Structural functionalism]
701 words (2 pages)
- ... A functionalist would explain that the added income in many families would allow for other aspects of society to benefit, therefore benefitting society. However, the changing family structures could also be burdening society, as less people may be getting married and having children, etc. From an economic standpoint, less people in society means less people to generate income and pay taxes which will affect a larger, aging population. If less people are having children it could also impact the functioning of schools, toy stores, hospitals, and many other aspects of society.... [tags: Sociology, Family, Nuclear family]
1294 words (3.7 pages)