Freedom of speech assures that a powerful government does not use speech restrictions to override the power of the democracy. In Schenck v. US (1919), Schenck spoke out against the government by protesting the draft and encouraging men to fight conscription, and was convicted of violating the Espionage Act of 1917. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of speech restrictions, arguing that words that “create a clear and present danger…will bring about the substantive evils that Congress has a right to prevent” (Justice Holmes qtd. in Fraleigh and Tuman 57). Schenck’s speech was definitively chilled simply because his opinion was unpopular, and of the minority opinion. Although it was valued political speech that peacefully criticized a government action, nonetheless the Court ruled against protection because his speech had the potential to disrupt the opinion of the majority: the US government. This case demonstrates that the government tends toward using the power of suppression to prosecute minority opinion rather than shelter it. Fortunately, the clear and present danger test has b...
... middle of paper ...
...tration to cease. Rather than stifling the speech of minorities, freedom of speech for all allows the opportunity to combat hateful speech with corrective speech, and thus eliminates the potential for minority speech to be censored unduly. Thus, freedom of offensive speech does not promote societal inequality, but rather ensures protection for all speech.
Freedom of speech remains a crucial component in supporting equality in society because unpopular opinions often suffer the most repression. Additionally, if one does protest to certain speech they consider harmful, fighting that speech with speech of their own often proves to be the best remedy, as evidenced by Collin. Rather than supporting inequality, freedom of speech ensures that those of unpopular or minority opinions have the equal opportunity to share their beliefs alongside those of the majority judgement.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- Bradley Smith, an undergraduate student at the University of Central Maryland, grew up in a predominantly white community, where he was exposed to a lot of racial remarks that were not taken seriously. When he came to UCMD, he was exposed to a diverse community for the first time. He joined the fraternity, Kappa Delta Sigma, and became the president during his sophomore year. He posted derogatory and discriminatory remarks on the fraternity’s twitter page that were offensive to women and minorities.... [tags: Ethics, Morality, Freedom of speech]
1421 words (4.1 pages)
- The First Amendment protects the right of freedom of speech, which gradually merges into the modern perspective of the public throughout the history and present. The restriction over the cable TV and broadcast media subjected by the Federal Communications Commission violates the freedom of speech, irritating the dissatisfied public by controlling over what can be said on the air. Should the FCC interfere with the free speech of media. The discretion of content being presented to the public should not be completely determined by the FCC, but the public in its entirety which enforces a self-regulation with freedom and justice, upholding and emphasizing the freedom of speech by abolishing the h... [tags: Freedom of speech]
1244 words (3.6 pages)
- From Individualism to Unionism: The Changing Meaning of Freedom in America In 1893, when Frederick Jackson Turner delivered his speech on the significance of frontier at the World’s Columbian Exposition in Chicago, he was addressing an audience that had witnessed the drastic changes that swept through the country over the past sixty or so years. The United States had gone from the agrarian nation of Jefferson’s vision—one with a relatively balanced division of wealth, a population of homogenous skilled workers, and a narrow definition of equality based on a broad definition of freedom—to the highly industrialized urban nation glorified by the World’s Fair itself—one of polarized wealth, vas... [tags: Essays Papers]
3148 words (9 pages)
- The term political correctness (PC) has infringed on our freedom of speech by assuming that the populace is too ignorant to realize what appropriate speech is. This term is now as common in our society as the term, ‘freedom of speech’. It is incomprehensible how these two words have had such an effect on the manner in which our society communicates. The trend casts a negative view on our society by letting political views determine what is appropriate in our social sector. Political correctness, as applied in today’s society, seeks to control freedom of speech and poses a true danger to a free society.... [tags: Freedom of Speech]
1460 words (4.2 pages)
- Freedom of speech has been a topic of discussion for many years. Since democracy was established in many countries to provide safety and rights, freedom of speech has been one of the most important rights in any constitution. Freedom of speech constitutes a human right that all people should have and one that must be respected. As individuals, we are entitled to express our opinions, write, publish or communicate, and such expressions must be, if not shared, respected. Different countries have certain level of tolerance at the moment of executing this right.... [tags: Freedom of Speech]
807 words (2.3 pages)
- In the debate, “Freedom of Speech Threatened on Campus”, four panelist argued either in favor or against the motion. In this case the winners of this debate where the pro side due to their good use of supporting arguments. As for the opposing team they lost audience support due to their weak presentation of arguments. This paper will focus on one of the opposing panelist whose arguments were unsupported. Shaun Harper the Director of the center for the study of Race & Equity in Education, of the University of Pennsylvania argued that freedom speech is not threatened in universities by speech codes rather students who are judging does students voicing their opinion are the ones who are threa... [tags: Hate speech, Freedom of speech, Censorship]
1745 words (5 pages)
- Freedom of Speech and Expression Although we are guaranteed freedom of speech in our fundamental freedoms under section two of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, and freedom of expression under section two (b) of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, the Anti Terrorism Act infringes this right. Much of “political activity, including expression and activism that challenges government policy is and always has been a target of high policing in Canada.” (Larsen, M., 2015) Perhaps the government feels threatened by new ideas and does not want to be challenged.... [tags: Freedom of speech, Censorship, Freedom of thought]
879 words (2.5 pages)
- College campuses have always been a hot spot for free speech arguments. Whether students are arrested for protesting the Vietnam War or getting expelled for using racial slurs, it all boils down to one common argument: the constitutional rights we have as American citizens according to the First Amendment. The First Amendment protects freedom of speech without prosecution, but some consider it a grey area. One major question that faces college campuses is, is it possible to create speech codes limiting the spread of offensive discourse that do not violate the First Amendment.... [tags: Freedom of speech]
867 words (2.5 pages)
- In her op-ed, "In College and Hiding From Scary Ideas", Shulevitz discusses the idea behind freedom of speech on college campuses and how safe spaces are snuffing it out. Shulevitz uses multiple examples of problems that have arisen because of safe spaces at universities such as Brown University, Columbia University, and Oxford 's University 's Christ Church college. Debate cancellations, essay opinions that caused protest, and other situations involving freedom of speech that Shulevitz uses to back up her opinion that safe spaces are nothing but harm to college campuses.... [tags: Thought, Idea, University, Freedom of speech]
1094 words (3.1 pages)
- Freedom of speech allows us to freely express ideas, to worship in the way we choose, to agree and disagree with each other and to stay informed. As long as we don’t incite violence on others or any of the other things that the First Amendment does not protect us from, we are free to express ourselves as we wish. An individual can support or condemn anything they want; “don’t eat red meat, it’ll kill you”, “the president should be praised”, “the president should be impeached”, “the Chicago Blackhawks are the greatest hockey team ever.” These declarations can be well thought out, researched and fact-checked, or simply phrases repeated because they sounded good to whomever heard them at the ti... [tags: Hate speech, Freedom of speech, Censorship]
852 words (2.4 pages)