Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
consumer protection rights simple eassy
project on consumer protection act
description of case study
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: consumer protection rights simple eassy
Cell Phone Contracts In the present day, most people have cell phones. It is also true that most people have a negative experience with a cell phone company imposing early termination fees. When people activate their cell service, they are forces to enter a binding contract for one to two years. If the customer agrees to the contract they will be obligated to pay the whole contract term or they will be assessed the early termination fee. However, the days of cell phone contracts early termination fees are beginning to change. Contract “A contract is a legally enforceable promise.” Lau, T., & Johnson, L. (2013). When people buy cell phones these days, they understand that they will be entering a legally enforceable promise. Nevertheless, the customer expects that the service that the company provides is adequate and up to the customers standards service in return. This is the reason some of the cell companies have been in legal battles over their cell contracts. T-Mobile Class Action Suit A few years past, T-Mobile held customers to a flat rate fee of 200 dollars whether or not the customer was in the beginning of the contract or nearing the end. The company tried to settle this disagreement with customers in arbitration. However, a California court found that the agreement was unconscionable and unenforceable. “The lawsuit also argues that the flat fee for early termination constituted "an unlawful penalty under Civil Code section 1671, subdivision (d), is unlawful under the unfair competition law and is unconscionable under the Consumers Legal Remedies Act.” (Turner, 2007) Results of the T-Mobile Lawsuit With the Judge finding what T- Mobile did was unlawful, the ruling sets precedence. The precedence allows other people ... ... middle of paper ... ...t. However, if no good faith gestures are given back to the customer the company may very well be hurting the company in the end. Competition in this industry is fierce, and without contracts holding customers hostage the cell phone industry is in for unprecedented changes. References Lau, T., & Johnson, L. (2013). The legal and ethical environment of business. Irvington, NY: Flat World Knowledge, Inc. DOI: www.flatworldstudents.com Turner, H. (2007, July 12). Lawsuit against t-mobile's early termination fee gets go-ahead. Retrieved from http://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/features/cell_phone_early_termination_fees/tmobile-fees.html Dolcourt, J. (2013, November 13). Why the us is poised for off-contract shift (Smartphone’s unlocked). Retrieved from http://reviews.cnet.com/8301-6452_7-57612191/why-the-us-is-poised-for-off-contract-shift-smartphones-unlocked/
Verizon Wireless cellular service is inelastic because the products and services it offers makes them the dominant leader in the wireless industry; therefore, a 10% change in calling plan prices (monthly access fees) would not affect the quantity demanded. Verizon Wireless can depend on this inelasticity in their pricing model because of the strength of its brand and the wealth of products and services it offers. Verizon Wireless' competitive advantage comes from its ultra-low churn rate (the percentage of customers who disconnect their service is less than one percent of its 60 million customer base). This indicator suggests that customers are satisfied with the service Verizon Wireless offers and a slight price increase probably would not drive its customers to the competition. This data also suggests that customers probably stay with Verizon Wireless because of its continued expansion of new technologies and services such as its all-digital nationwide CDMA network, EVDO' or its advanced data network (used to wireless send and receive email and other data almost anywhere in the US), and VoIP (Voice over Internet Protocol) that they use for their Push to Talk products. Verizon Wireless markets to a nearly all demographics nationwide and most of its services are offered in the smaller rural markets as a direct result of the one billion dollars per quarter it spends on improving its network as well as acquiring smaller wireless networks to make their nationwide network stronger and larger.
GREEN TREE FINANCIAL CORP.-ALABAMA et al. v. RANDOLPH: certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh circuit. (2009). Supreme Court Cases: The Twenty-first Century (2000 - Present), 1. 513 US 79, p. 373-387.
Jennings, M. (2012). Business: Its ethical, legal, and global environment. (9th Ed.) Mason, OH: South-Western Cengage Learning ISBN: 978-0538470544
Jennings, Marianne M. Business: Its Legal, Ethical, and Global Environment. Mason, Ohio: Cengage Learning, 2008. Print.
For months, the prospect of a T-Mobile and AT&T merger has become more public. The prolonged merger discussion has left the public wondering if the acquisition will allow AT&T to completely rule the telecommunications market, leaving Verizon and Sprint in the dust. Mobile subscribers have been left unsure by the shocking announcement, wondering how their pockets and cellular services will be affected. With lawsuits being filed by both the Department of Justice and Sprint, the future of the acquisition is unclear. AT&T stands by its history of fair dealing, publishing the following in its Code of Ethics:
... no surprises, overages, or hidden fees. Alongside so many decisions that has to be made daily, contemplating a cellular service provider can be a headache individuals try to solve quickly. The big question when comparing which carrier's plan is a suitable service is the cost. Pondering what distinguishes one carrier from another can be an advantage to any consumer's budget. Contracts no longer monopolize the cellular service, prepaid is the "new" smart option. Doing a little research is prudent to prevent substantial amounts of fees from occurring before committing yourself to a two year contract sentence. Intitially, most companies offer prepaid plans that eliminates lengthy obligations but by comparing AT&T, T-Mobile, and Verizon with Straight Talk's new prepaid plans any consumer should be able to select the right provider to meet their specific cellular needs.
T-mobile originated stores that allowed customers to actually interact with the lifestyle that they created, making it a valuable shopping experience. T-mobile continues to be a leader in today’s industry; they’ve expended worldwide, presenting 4G LTE and contract free. The reputation of T-mobile has a true distinctive image, and has been consistently developed across a large expanding number of products, brands and international markets. The company’s brand names constitute one of the world’s largely recognized families of consumer brands.
McLean, Prince. "Apple defends AT&T, downplays talk of multi-carrier inevitability." Apple Insider. Apple Insider, 13 Mar 2010. Web. 14 Mar 2010. .
In this following report I will discuss the phone industry and analysed it in great detail. I will analysis the market structure and try and understand why the mobile industry falls to heavily oligopoly structure. I will highlight all the structures, however I will discuss in detail how, for example Vodafone can be incorporated in the porter’s five forces method to show how the mobile industry has devolved over the years and to understand if consumers are driven by the actual technology of the phone but if it driven more by style.
Telecommunications gained mainstream attention in the early 90’s; however the initial key market was business men and women, who used their phones whilst being on the move and so allowing them to communicate with their companies with ease. Though in the modern era, telecommunication went through segmentation in the market trends, and now in this day and age it would be difficult to find someone who does not own some form of mobile technology. Many phone providers battle to provide the best service for their customers (Figure 1).
This paper aims to give a broad review of the famous Vodafone case whose main issue de...
There is a slowdown in sales of mobile handsets, in some markets like the UK, as the mature part of the product lifecycle is reached. Customers are exposed to a barrage of different images and messages by mobile phone companies, as the competition gets tougher. Vodafone appeals to new customers and aims to keep its existing ones by emphasising the uniqueness of the brand.
The year is 2014, the markets are changing constantly, and they always have to meet the needs of new consumers as well as old consumers. Mobile telephones have been in the retail and wholesale business for quite some time, and are only evolving from here on out. There are things that these cell phones can bring us that are major benefits in our everyday lives. Cell phones bring us maps, radios, address books, and even flashlights now. Cell phones have taken shape from a huge portable device to a more convenient thin device that can fit in your pocket. With time in any consumer market, the consumer adapts to the technology that makes their life easier. The constant innovation of cell phones has led us to smart phones, and these smart phones are capable of putting certain businesses out of the market. Businesses that engineered PDAs in the past were met with challenges because smart phones are able to match their productivity. Land lines have become useless since everyone can afford a mobile device now. Listening to music has also switched from a traditional CD Player/MP3 Player to an everyday smart phone.
Without having a clear understanding of how it works it could cause a misunderstanding and very well make the contract invalid, causing legal issues later on down the line if there is no consideration from both parties. A business person could suffer a loss due to lack of consideration if a court was to rule whether or not a contract is unenforceable. Either party may not fulfill their side of the agreement or the court may file a breach of contract against the opposing
For at least a century, the English law has prohibited contracting parties from agreeing terms which are designed to punish a breaching party by imposing a liability for a particular breach