Chapter Three - Causation in the Criminal Law
Chapter three allowed me to discover many new concepts including the legal definition of death, the difference between factual and legal causation, the difference between active and passive euthanasia, what assisted suicide is, and that there can be more than one cause of death.
Much of this chapter focused on focused on causation. “ In all cases where consequences are an essential element of the actus reus, it is clear that the Crown must prove that "but for" the actions of the accused, the prohibited consequences would not have occurred.” (Lecture Slide, Sept 24(2) PPT) The consequences of someone’s actions must be foreseeable, and there should be a clear link between the act and the consequence. An individual should only be punished for an event that could be foreseen from their actions. Foreseeability becomes a big factor in causation.
An applicable case is Trotta (2004). In this case, a husband and wife faced many charges after the death of their child who was eight months old. The evidence showed that the husband assaulted the child, and the knowing wife did nothing to prevent the assault. The man was charged with second degree murder and his wife was charged with criminal negligence causing death. This case was later appealed.
Another applicable case is Nette (2001). This took place at the supreme court of Canada, where the court ruled that “there are two - quite distinct - issues that must be considered in determining whether or not the accused’s conduct caused a certain prohibited consequence: namely, factual causation (or causation in fact) and legal causation (or causation in law).” (Jones, 2011, p. 52) Factual causation uses a mechanical test whereas le...
... middle of paper ...
...e. This section states that “A female person commits infanticide when by a wilful act or omission she causes the death of her newly-born child, if at the time of the act or omission she is not fully recovered from the effects of giving birth to the child and by reason thereof or of the effect of lactation consequent on the birth of the child her mind is then disturbed.” (Criminal Code, 1985)
The case of Roy (2012) touches upon an offence of dangerous driving causing death. In this case, Roy was driving home in poor conditions on slippery roads. Roy’s passenger was killed when he turned onto the highway and collided with a tractor-trailer. Since Roy could not recall the events due to losing his memory, he could not explain what happened.This case worked its way up to the Supreme Court of Canada, where they stated that the mens rea of the offence was never proved.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- Introduction This paper provides an understanding of the different ingredients of actus reus in criminal law. It covers relevant literature as well as analyzes case law on the concept. What is actus reus. An individual in the normal course of events cannot be accused or be held liable for a serious criminal offence unless two elements are present, firstly, the mens rea or guilty mind and the physical element or actus reus. This principle is often stated in the form of a Latin maxim; actus non facit reum nisi mens sit rea which means that a person cannot be held guilty of a crime unless his mind is also guilty.... [tags: guilty, criminal law, conduct, act, causation]
1749 words (5 pages)
- Causation is essential in establishing an actus reus in result crimes, however, there must be evidence that shows that the defendant caused the result of the crime. Causation helps to determine who caused the crime, and for a person to be guilty it must be proved their actions led to the harm caused to the victim through the chain of causation. There are two types of causation: factual and legal, which must be fulfilled before a defendant is liable. Factual causation is based on the facts of the case, using the 'but for ' test to determine whether there would have been harm caused to the victim 'but for ' the defendant 's actions.... [tags: Causality, Criminal law, Tort law, Death]
1020 words (2.9 pages)
- There are many beliefs and theories in the world that try to explain why many people commit crimes and why they do. The theories of crime causation go as far back as the mid -1700s. Based from Sociological School of criminology one of the many reasons of crime causation is because an individual’s socioeconomic conditions and social interactions. There are many theories why a young individual will commit criminal acts, but many reasons they will or might commit crimes is economic status and family interaction.... [tags: Crime, Police, Criminal law, Criminology]
737 words (2.1 pages)
- The Seven Principles of Criminal Law When examining crime, it can sometimes be difficult to tell where to start. Distinguishing a crime from a non-crime can seem like a simple task, but the criminal justice system has several guidelines that answer the question, “What constitutes a crime”. This is the first and most fundamental question in all of the criminal justice system. It is of the utmost importance to determine who has committed a crime so, if found guilty, that individual can be punished and justice can be given to the victim.... [tags: Criminal law, Law, Criminal justice, Police]
770 words (2.2 pages)
- To begin with, there are several theories and perspectives that can explain the causation of crime. Each perspective has its own opinion about why people commit crimes. It analyzes three different perspectives which are social, biological and classical. Let’s take a look at all three and determine which perspective would be best fitted with the two types of sentencing models which are called determinate and indeterminate. First, the indeterminate model is “a prison sentence that consists of a range of years” ("Indeterminate Sentence | Nolo 's Free Dictionary of Law Terms and Legal Definitions," n.d.).... [tags: Crime, Gang, Sentence, Criminal law]
1041 words (3 pages)
- Considering Arnold’s actions, the facts show that he had purposefully poisoned his wife which led to a series of events that eventually resulted in her death. In a practical sense, it is clear that Arnold’s actions were a factual causation because he satisfies the ‘but for’ or sine qua non test as established in White . But for him putting poison into Beryl’s porridge, she would not have been admitted to hospital and she would not have later died there. Even so, to claim that he committed the actus reus of the homicide offence, it is necessary to prove it had been a legal causation and that there had been no novus actus interveniens that rendered Arnold’s act irrelevant.... [tags: Causality, Criminal law, Proximate cause]
1605 words (4.6 pages)
- The offence Harry would be charged with is William’s murder. The area of Law that this case is concerned with is criminal law (homicide). The two offences that constitute homicide are murder and manslaughter. The classic definition of murder was set by Sir Edward Coke (Institutes of the Laws of England, 1797). Murder is defined by the Law as causing the death of a human being within the Queen’s peace with the intention to kill or cause grievous bodily harm. It comprises of 2 elements. These are the actus reus (guilty act) and the mens rea (intention).... [tags: Criminal Law Essays]
1386 words (4 pages)
- 'Liability in criminal law normally requires the prosecution to establish that the accused has caused the relevant prohibited consequences or conduct to occur. For instance, in homicide, that the accused has caused the victims death.' Within the English Legal System, the chain of causation is established via numerous principles, which have been recognised by case law, as the problem areas have come before courts. It is clear that when ascertaining whether the defendant is the person to fix liability, the courts will look at two main issues.... [tags: Criminal Law Essays]
1190 words (3.4 pages)
- Sara was teaching her husband, Tom to drive but he was a slow learner frequently subjected to excessive criticism by Sara and there were numerous arguments between them. During the course of a lesson, Sara suggested to Tom that he was not using the clutch properly. Tom made no reply but, a few minutes later, suddenly steered the car off the road into a ditch. At the time, Sara was not wearing her seatbelt and she was thrown through the windscreen and badly injured. Had she received prompt treatment, she would probably have survived but her body was not discovered until three hours later.... [tags: Criminal Law Essays]
2266 words (6.5 pages)
- H was a world famous darts player. He was demonstrating his skill at an outdoor fete in aid of a charity. H offered 50 to anyone who would place an apple on his head and permit H to throw a dart at it. H contemplated the risk of hitting such a person. I volunteered, placing the apple on his head. H threw the dart but sudden gust of wind caused the dart to deviate from trajectory and hit I’s ear. I’s blood dripped onto I’s coat. The dart continued on to hit an electric cable, setting fire to a fete tent.... [tags: Criminal Law Essays]
1060 words (3 pages)