Essay PreviewMore ↓
Strickland called the bill “common-sense legislation”, Strickland also stressed that it will also clear up ambiguous sections of Ohio's concealed-carry law “What we've clarified in this bill I think will go a long way toward providing both law enforcement as well as law-abiding citizens some confidence that what they're doing is, in fact, consistent with the law,” he said. (cbaus.)
I do not think that the Castle Doctrine can possibly clear up Ohio’s already convoluted concealed-carry laws for firearms because the Castle Doctrine states that you can react with deadly force to protect yourself from people trying to hurt you but the law does not put any real limitations on your ability to act aggressively when someone is threatening you. However threatening behavior is never really definable because everyone feels threatened by different things, a joke to one person is a threat to somebody else.
The Castle Doctrine allows you to defend yourself or your family from criminals but, where does that stop and the line between killing someone and claiming self-defense begin. There is no boundary that is clearly defined by law, so those people that are taking advantage of the Castle Doctrine often get away with it. I think that people being able to protect themselves is a good idea because the cops don’t always make it on time or at all but I think that there should be much more limits on this law and that it should be federally mandated and the law should be the same nationwide. I think that the people who have claimed the Castle Doctrine should be investigated thoroughly and if it comes out that they were the aggressor then I don’t think they should be allowed to claim it. The Castle Doctrine really does need to be revised and made so that there are no loopholes and the fact that it is different from state to state just helps people get away with killing somebody else. I don’t think that any law that is made with the intention of letting people get off free with murdering somebody else should exist without the time and attention paid to it that taking somebody else’s life deserves.
How to Cite this Page
"The Castle Doctrine." 123HelpMe.com. 06 Dec 2019
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- ... This current technological roadblock can prevent cell phone only citizens from a quick emergency response for break-ins or burglaries. These occupants cannot divulge their location or are incapable of communications during network congestion or due to faulty cellular phone equipment. The Castle Doctrine is a valuable provision giving self-defense and legal shelter for otherwise helpless residents attempting to save their own lives. Even if the cellular network and mobile phone equipment are in working order, increased police response times will still put occupants at grave risk of personal injury.... [tags: ]
610 words (1.7 pages)
- The Castle Doctrine is a bill that was passed which lets you defend yourself with necessary force in your residence if someone is breaking into your home. Criminals like to go after easy targets such as, the elderly, disabled citizens, children, and people who are unarmed. Every citizen has the right to live free and happy, if they are attacked they should be able to defend themselves and their property without being charged as a murderer. The previous state law, if someone unlawfully enters your home or attempts a car-jacking, you are required to first retreat instead of immediately fighting to protect yourself.... [tags: Castle Doctrine, Self Defense]
652 words (1.9 pages)
- Self Defense Are Important To Us Americans “It’s been said that a man’s home is his castle, but what rights does this afford a homeowner in defense of this castle?” (Purves). People take advantage of this law to use deadly weapons to supposedly defend them. They do not even think about getting away from situations where they feel like they could end up in danger, they feel like they are allowed to use our guns under the Castle Doctrine laws. “The Castle Doctrine gives citizens in their homes – and in some states, cars or workplaces the right to protect themselves, other people, and their property by force – in some instances even deadly force” (Purves).... [tags: Castle Doctrine, Lethal Weapons]
1508 words (4.3 pages)
- Religion is not unlike a castle, a grand architecture built upon the compilation of individual beliefs and traditions. It begins small at first, almost unseen as its foundations are set in place. As the bricks of belief are stacked, its walls grow and become something more recognizable. Next, the wooden boards of tradition are set in place and the structure is fleshed out, and ornate wallpaperings and furnishing begin to decor the interior as the structure develops into an elegant work of art, and the religion blossoms into a way of life.... [tags: Religion, Christianity, God, Polytheism]
1261 words (3.6 pages)
- History 23 ML # 2 Last lesson we closed with Martin Luther and his conflict with the teaching of his church on works and some other doctrine issues. today we pick up with some of the issues that he dealt with. http://andnowyouknowmore.blogspot.com We have on two different occasions visited Wittenberg, once when it was in East Germany and the last time it was when it became part of unified Germany. The main reason for our visit was to see the Castle and study the reformation on site. Wittenberg castle/church According to Roman Catholicism, once a person is baptized and his original sin is removed, he must perform good works because they are also necessary for salvation. (CCC 2068).... [tags: Catholic Church, Protestant Reformation]
1308 words (3.7 pages)
- The Nature of Space in Kafka's The Castle From the end of the nineteenth century to the outbreak of World War I, great developments in technology and knowledge brought about significant changes in the way man viewed time and space. The necessity of clear train schedules led to the development of World Standard Time and the plurality of private time. In regards to space, with which this paper deals, man moved into other subjective realms beyond the two and three dimensions described by Euclid.... [tags: Kafka Castle Essays]
2349 words (6.7 pages)
- Born abused raised to a soldier Life is an amazing thing just like Jeannette Walls’ in The Glass Castle. Add a sentence about her hardships. People are awesome and we do many great things in life. Some of us go on to making and creating amazing inventions and other gadgets. Some of us go on to doing heroic things with our life. Well all have great and amazing moments but sometimes we have not so great or even tragic events. I 'm not going to say I 've had it the worst like Jeannette, but I 've definitely have a story to tell.... [tags: Family, Grandparent, The Glass Castle]
1349 words (3.9 pages)
- Plot: Beggining: Once upon there was a girl named Hanna, she was walking around in the city, then she founded a collar, she didn't see anyone near so she took it. At her house she saw it in detail. It was a strange collar but was beautifull, so she put it on. While she was sleeping, she was feeling like something was shining, she didn't knew it was the collar so she continued sleeping. The next day, she went to walk outside and the collar started to shine, she didn't knew why it was happening but she continued walking around.... [tags: marco, hanna, castle]
646 words (1.8 pages)
- In this both heart wrenching and slightly humorous memoir, journalist Jeannette Walls tells the bittersweet story of her rather dysfunctional and poverty stricken upbringing. Walls grows up in a family trailed by the ubiquitous presence of hunger and broken homes. Throughout the memoir she recounts memories of moving from one dilapidated neighborhood to another with her three other siblings, insanely "free sprinted" mother, and incredibly intelligent yet alcoholic father. The author focuses on her unconventional childhood with parents who were too lazy and self-absorbed to obtain decent jobs.... [tags: The Glass Castle]
1131 words (3.2 pages)
- Analysis of The Last Castle In the film, The Last Castle, I found many aspects and theories that involve organizational communication throughout the movie. The film is about a US prison where the prisoners have formally served in the military and have committed crimes while serving their time. The movie shows how the prisoners come together when a former well-respected general is sent there to overpower the man that runs the facility. The first theory and probably the most noted theory is the Adaptive Structuration Theory of Marshall Scott Poole.... [tags: The Last Castle Movies Communication Essays]
984 words (2.8 pages)
The problems with the Castle Doctrine have never been clearer than in the case of Harper. Brice Harper. Harper shot and killed the Husband of the women he was having an affair with. The man was angry certainly but unarmed. The husband, Dan Fredenberg walked into Harper’s garage and was shot three times. Harper claimed he was defending himself, and won’t be charged but I do not understand how he was protecting himself exactly. Yeah, the guy was probably going to kick his ass but he was sleeping with his wife; a well-deserved beat-down and he did not have to shoot the guy he could have simply brandished the gun, there was no need to shoot him, let alone shoot him three times. He could have even held him at gunpoint until the cops arrived, or even just shoot him in the kneecap to incapacitate him.
“Harper told the police he feared for his life at that point. Maybe so. But it’s hard to see how he could have reasonably had such a fear when he saw Fredenberg walking up the driveway and had the option of going inside and closing the door. Montana’s law, however, gives people in this situation more leeway for a confrontation—this really is about standing your ground, for good reason or for bad. You can use force if you think it’s necessary to prevent someone from unlawfully entering a house. You can use force “likely to cause death or serious bodily harm” if you think that’s necessary to keep yourself from being assaulted. You don’t have to fear that you may be killed or seriously injured. You have no duty to retreat or call the police. And if you have evidence that your use of force was justified, it’s the state’s burden to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that it wasn’t()
I think that this incident and the many similar ones to it just go to show how bad the Castle Doctrine is. Now I can understand a teenaged mother protecting her children from a home invader is a good idea but, this situation is very different from the norm. The mother was on the phone with police dispatch and was protecting her children, she also asked repeatedly if she could shoot before she did and that’s what you are supposed to do. Harper’s situation was a lot different he knew that Fredenberg was unarmed and he did not even attempt to call the police, Fredenberg was probably not going to be of significant threat to him after all Harper was the one with the weapon and Fredenberg did not break into his house and harper certainly was not protecting anyone and really he had no just cause to shoot Fredenberg three times resulting in his death.
The Castle Doctrine could do a lot of good but because it’s so very vague in what actually constitutes a threat and what does not and all the extensions just make it the best law for people like Harper to take advantage of. The Castle Doctrine would need a lot of revisions and carefully placed limits before it could ever be considered a good thing, as of now the castle doctrine has just been helping a lot of murders walk free when they should be imprisoned lately than it is helping anyone.
Teen Mom Shoots
Case of Brice Harper