Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
bribery and corruption ethical issues
conflict management and employees performance
conflict management and human resource management
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: bribery and corruption ethical issues
Case Study Corruption/Bribery/Personal relationships Case: Brooks is a vice president who mainly deals with domestic jobs, but has a new project working with a foreign government. It just so happens that Brooks has a personal relationship with a Foreign Official from that country and knows him and his family well. Brooks, however, has not disclosed this relationship to the Company. When the Official called one day and asked her to find an internship for the Official 's daughter at the company, Brooks thought nothing of it. It was something she would do for any friend, and helping the Official 's daughter could only have a positive effect on the pending deal between the Company and the Country. When she called H.R. to inquire about a possible
Serpico (1973) is a movie that reveals the true story of Frank Serpico who was the only honest cop in the New York police sector at his time. The film shows the realistic view of the corruption that was evidenced in the New York police and highlights the character of Frank as being honest and courageous. Although he started as an inexperienced cop, he later worked as an undercover officer and was determined to bust all the criminal activities especially the drug dealers and pushers. Unlike the other cops, Serpico refused to take any bribes from the wrongdoers. More so, he felt that the other officers were doing wrong by accepting bribes and wanted to expose the situation. The other officers were so corrupt that they collected more money through bribes than the salary they earned, a situation that did not please Serpico. His strong stand concerning corruption made his friends turn against him, placing his life in danger. The anti-corruption efforts of Serpico jeopardized his life at the hands of his colleagues. He was later transferred to the Narcotics Squad where he was shot by a drug dealer after his partners betrayed him by failing to support him. The cop was then rushed to hospital. The shooting made Frank deaf since it affected the brain, rendering
The “Noble-Cause” corruption is often compared to the Dirty Harry problem asking whether it was necessary for the officer to inflict pain on a suspect in order to acquire information that would save an innocent victim (Pollock, 2015). Sometimes because of the limited resources that an officer has or the mindset that an officer has where everyone is the enemy offers them no other choices but to venture out into the unethical world.
do such actions. The short answer mostly greed today I will be talking about three
Zinn portrayed the Nixon presidency and Watergate affair as secretive and scandalous. Nixon was known for being involved in “dirty tricks” regarding government secrets, corruption, and burglary. Nixon’s corruption infiltrated government along with major companies. For example General John Mitchell created a secret fund against Democrats to help Nixon, large companies gave illegal donations to his campaign, some of his cabinet members stole money, and his Vice President Spiro Agnew received bribes. This corruption also infiltrated the CIA and affected the FBI. Nixon himself took charge of the Watergate scandal in order to steal secret documents and information to aid his re-election campaign. After some of the burglars were caught, Nixon rewarded them with money to keep them quiet. Nixon also used government money for his own private homes and engaged in a secret bombing of Cambodia.
As indicated from the case, when Bob found out about Al’s trip to Detroit, he got very upset as he did not know that Al was there to close the deal with Delta Corp. This example shows a lack of communication between Bob and Al. I believe its Al’s responsibility to make sure that all the important, critical information is known to Bob and to other senior
Over the past centuries, South Florida counties mayor-council forms have been frequently correlated to the association of corrupted government officials. Constituents have been conditioned to expect local governments' corruption tactics, but levels of endurance have been set; meaning they can take but so much before the people speak out. Supporters or fans are mesmerized by officials as they campaign and rally for locals' support. Speeches of lies and deceit have become the leading jargon of political speeches. Lowering taxes, creating jobs, and decreasing crime rates are the propaganda political leaders propose to the vulnerable followers. The forgotten promises become a vague memory why officials were elected in office. Instead of meeting the goals they had aimed to achieve, they warm their plush leather mayor's seats; plant a few trees in the city; kiss a few babies, and make the city treasury their personal piggy banks (e.g. former Mayor Carlos Alvarez). Apparently, the obligations as a mayor have been hindered by lust and greed once they are in office. The ethics of the true meaning of a mayor and their duties have been manipulated, and abandoned, from the true origins of mayor-council form obligations. In addition, constituents have repressed their opinions and subdue to corruption, despite the evident abuse of power. Locals believe their voices will be ignored; hence, they are willing to accept repression and undergo corruption until they think the well has run dry. Multiple occurrences of mayor political corruption surrounds the argument what permits the mishandling of power? Theoretically, the differentiations of weak mayor-council form versus strong mayor-council form are variables in variation of the ou...
Death and decay often convey corruption within a story. The use of this particular imagery allows one to make a connection between the natural world and the nature of people. Throughout Hamlet, a play, set in Denmark, which was written in the early seventeenth century by William Shakespeare, there are several instances where one sees decay depicting corruption. Though this play is filled with massive images of decaying nature, it is also filled with images of nature in its beautiful state. Because Hamlet portrays decaying and developing nature, it shows one that it is possible to maintain a sense of self in a world that strives on corruption.
There are countries that are not as lucky as America, where people have their rights taken away from them, like in Equatorial Guinea. Equatorial Guinea has a very corrupt government. It has been said that the voting has been rigged so that the president will win the election as many times as he wants. Most of the power is in the executive branch, so the president has most of the power of the country and no one can say anything about what he wants to happen. He president will harass the opposing parties so that he will win (Williams). In the article Equatorial Guinea HRW (Human Rights Watch) says, “Corruption, poverty, and repression continue to plague Equatorial Guinea under President Teodoro Obiang Nguema Mbasogo, who has been in power since 1979”. The “...per capita gross domestic product...” for Equatorial Guinea is $30,000, but yet most of the people live in poverty. The “...Democratic Party of Equatorial Guinea (PDGE)...” rule the political system, you could say that it is a monopoly. The president of Equatorial Guinea will have a say in court cases. The court cases that are sensitive get brought to him and he gets asked what he wants to do (Equatorial...). We should care about Equatorial Guinea because arrest without reason, torture captives and give little rights to women.
Bribery is wrong, and it would be almost instinctive to point at the benefits of impartially functioning public servants and incorrupt corporations to our democratic society as justification. However, in this imperfect world where bribery is rife in varying degrees, is it possible to express this notion convincingly? Certainly 'because the UK Bribery Act says so' is far less persuasive to a council planning office in Shanghai than in London, and indeed in compliance with section 7 of the Bribery Act 2010 which relates to commercial offences, it is essential that this question is engaged with on a corporate scale and without assertion through dogma. Accordingly, this essay will argue that elements wrong with bribery are inclusive of both moral and economic considerations. Moreover, in conjunction with international mandates, advent of aggressive legislation such as that of the UK Bribery Act 2010 is representative of global efforts to eliminate bribery. Hence, it follows that bribery can never be considered a normal part of business because it is economically unsustainable in the long term.
Over the last few years, the issue of corruption--the abuse of public office for private gain--has attracted renewed interest, both among academics and policymakers. There are a number of reasons why this topic has come under recent inspection. Corruption scandals have toppled governments in both major industrial countries and developing countries. In the transition countries, the shift from command economies to free market economies has created massive opportunities for the appropriation of rents, excessive profits, and has often been accompanied by a change from a well-organized system of corruption to a more chaotic and deleterious one. With the end of the cold war, donor countries have placed less emphasis on political considerations in allocating foreign aid among developing countries and have paid more attention to cases in which aid funds have been misused and have not reached the poor. And slow economic growth has persisted in many countries with malfunctioning institutions. This renewed interest has led to a new flurry of empirical research on the causes and consequences of corruption.
Many unsolved problems in many African countries, but the issue of the rise of corruption are disturbing, and the amends it has done to the polity are vast. The fear of fraud leads to restrict movement of documents in offices, slow traffic on the highways, port congestion, ghost workers syndrome, queues at passport offices, police extortion tollgates and gas stations, vote irregularities among others. Even the nutty people on the road remember the devastation caused by bribery - the funds allocated for their success disappear into some people pockets. Thus, some people believe corruption is the bane of many African countries. Corruption is the main obstacle to slow down, and knock African economy growing. The problem keeps happening in Africa, and the issue will hardly be solved.
The existence of bribery and unethical behavior is rampant in the world market and may not change overnight. The question of bribery has been distilled in business literature as a question of ethics. In this situation at the airport with the customs officer, it is important to distinguish between business ethics and personal ethics. In a business ethics situation, the Foreign Corruption Practices Act would prohibit offering any bribe to the custom office – for example to free a shipment of goods that was lost in red tape (Pitman & Sanford, 2006). Most companies also have policies against bribery as well. In this situation, however the main issue at hand is that of personal ethics. When in a situation where your company is unknown and there is no business being conducted, normal business ethics and laws (including FCPA) do not apply only personal ethical standards.
In simple terms Public Corruption can be defined as the misuse of public office for private gain.Corruption is an outcome and reflection of a country’s economic,legal,cultural and political institutions. Transparency International(2005,2008) found that more than 65% of Indians had a first hand experience of paying bribes and nearly 45% used contacts to get job done.Institutionalised Corruption has long been prevalent in India.Big Business and individuals dictate bureaucratic norms by breaking law,paying off public servants just to gain access to elements of governance.
Conceptualizing Corruption in South Africa Conceptualizing Corruption in South Africa Amr Taha El Baba Lebanese American University SPECIFIC PURPOSE: To persuade my audience that corruption could cripple the progress in South African societies. Crime and corruption are not relevant to the degree of poverty present in a country as some of you might think. Corruption is a social phenomenon that every society deals with, regardless of the level of development in the country. What makes corruption a dangerous social phenomenon is its ability to adapt to the conditions present in any country.
Corruption can be defined as the use of entrusted power to accumulate public wealthy for personal benefit. Corruption is not peculiar to any country, continent or state; it is sure a global issue which is an endemic to all government all over the world. However, corruption is prevalent in the Niger delta region of Nigeria; public officers in this oil producing state of Nigeria are corrupt. Consequently, it has defied the Niger delta from developing politically and economically which has left the states reputation in a mess. Radicalization of youths, abject poverty and -political instability are the three leading effects of corruption in the Niger delta region of Nigeria.