Case Analysis In the case of Shaun, Mrs. Blake, and the use of cell phones during class, many plausible stances could have been made. Shaun is a disruptive and dishonest student at Highlandview High School and often gets in trouble in school for his behavior. Mrs. Blake is a young teacher who is new to the school and is trying to gain the respect of her students, fellow teachers, and principal. Although there is no school policy regarding the use of cell phones, Mrs. Blake feels that students may be taking advantage of her by excessively using their cell phones during her class. She has decided to implement a rule banning the use of cell phones during her class period to promote student participation. The next day, expectedly, she observes …show more content…
Mrs. Blake should not give Shaun a detention. Because of the severity of this issue at home, Shaun should have notified Mrs. Blake of his mother 's condition before class. If Mrs. Blake was skeptical about Shaun’s honesty, she should have immediately requested a note from Maria or the principal, stating that Maria does in fact need Shaun to be on stand-by at all times. Once Mrs. Blake has proof of Maria 's situation, she should have let Shaun know that he is permitted to use his cellphone, only if he steps into the hallway to do so. Shaun may not use his cell phone within the classroom, even if for emergency reasons. This is in order to prevent the distraction of other students, which has been an ongoing problem, especially in Mrs. Blake 's classroom. A recent study done by the London School of Economics, found that when cellphones were banned from the classroom, there was an increase in test scores by 6.4% overall, and a 14% increase in underachieving students (CNN London, 2014). This proves that Mrs. Blake is not wrong for having a strong opinion on the use of cell phones during class and wanting Shaun to step outside to use his …show more content…
Blake keeps her decision to give him detention. She chooses this so students don 't think she 's a pushover and so he learns a lesson and doesn 't use his phone, he knows she is serious about the rule. Mrs. Blake chose to implement a zero tolerance rule in her classroom about not using her phone. Zero tolerance according to Strikes and Soltis (2009, p. 35) is a law that is given by the government that means different circumstances with not be taken into account. In other words, whatever the person does that goes against the stated rules, that person will receive the same punishment as everyone else, despite their
” Carr uses this example to provide evidence of how smartphones pose as a distraction and interrupt students from their work. Carr also uses “nearly a hundred secondary schools.” This example is used so readers can grasp the large amount of schools that are involved in the issue. Lastly Carr uses “The subjects whose phones were in view posted the worst scores, while those who left their phones in a different room did the best.”
This court ruling, although not pertaining to cell phones, has helped to set the precedence for rulings concerning disruptive cell phone use and school rights. According to “Cell Phones in American High Schools: A National Survey,” by John Obringer and Kent Coffey, eighty-four percent of high schools have written policies regarding cell phones and forty-seven percent allow students to carry their phones to class (on silent).... ... middle of paper ... ... Works Cited Diamantes, Thomas.
In the mornings, students are required to place their cell phones in a designated box in the office and are not allowed to touch them until the last bell rings. The only exception to this rule is a senior privilege. Seniors are allowed to leave their cell phones in their car instead of placing them in the box. The reasons I disagree with this rule are as follows: students who want to text during class will figure out a way to do so, it is impossible to communicate with your parents throughout the day, and phones are being broken in the boxes and Bayou refuses to pay for the repairs. Little does the school board know, MacBook’s and PC’s have downloadable apps that allow you to text the same way a cell phone would. In essence, we have a new rule and nothing has
One look at an email can rob someone of 15 minutes of focus and one text message can result in someone blowing off something important, like school. Cell phones should not be allowed at Lindbergh High School. Many people disagree on whether or not cell phones should be allowed, but Monique Conrod speaks out the consequences of phones in an article called Schools Divided Over Cellphones in Classrooms. Ms. Conrod announces, “One of the main reasons, for banning cell phones is that they can distract students from their work… the students admitted they... used their [electronics] for things other than school for more than half the time they were in class” (Conrod). If cellphones are allowed in class, then students will not pay attention to what
As you know students aren't aloud to use phones in school because they are too much of a distraction and kids will always be on their phones instead of listening to the teacher and actually learning at school.
There is more than one side to the debate about the use of cell phones in school. One claim is that cell phones should not be allowed in schools at all. Cell phones are a distraction and and they interfere with education (Lee). Rather than using them only for emergencies, students generally use them for entertainment purposes (Lee). Nowadays, cell phones can be used to email, text, call, and take pictures (Lee). Some students have trained themselves to text without looking at their phone, which makes it harder for teachers to catch them (Lee). Cell phones can also be a safety liability for schools (Lee). In the case of a bomb threat, cell phones can be used to not only call in the threat, but can also be used to detonate a bomb (Lee). In another
Nowadays, adults all across the globe says kids and teenagers are “glued to their phones”. Which is true, in some part. But actually, students use their phones daily not just to play games or parade around social media. So do they really know that they’re benefits to using your phone? A better question, to what extent should students and parents set limits to the use of their smartphones and cell phones?
“It’s a sight that’s all too common now: teenagers never looking up, glued to their cell phones every hour of the day"(Bautista). Teens are being distracted one way or another, and taking advantage of what our technology is capable of. The use of cell phones by students across the state of Pennsylvania should be prohibited because students are more likely to cheat, cell phones cause distractions, and hallways will become hazardous.
The first argument against cell phones in the classroom is, it is thought that technology adds an extra avenue for a student to cheat. With search engines able to give an answer in the matter of seconds, an overwhelming amount of students have admitted to cheating by using their smart phones. “ 52% admitted to some form of cheating involving the Internet” (Common Sense Media, 2011). Cheating is a huge issue, as it seems that students would rather risk their grades by cheating than simply study for a
Today’s cell phone is the front line technology at our fingertips. Keeping this in mind the use of cell phones have become an affair when it comes to allowing teens to use them in educational environments, such as schools. One part of society supports the use of cell phones while the other part of society disapproves the use of cell phones. I personally believe that cell phones should not only be allowed in school, but cell phones should be mandatory just like a textbook. Cell phones do not only allow students to stay united with friends and family, but cell phones are also a magnificent learning system, and they boost the liable use of technology.
It’s not acceptable to use cell phones in class. Actually, using cell phones has more negative effects than positive. So, why do we need to change the policy that prohibits students from using cell phones in classrooms? In my opinion, I will say no, we shouldn’t change the policy that exists now - no cell phone use, under any circumstances.
Staff obviously chose no, because they had never experienced cell phones in school before, when they themselves were students. Back then, cell phones didn't even exist! Adults tend to think that tradition must be maintained. Out of the results, most people actually said that cell phones shouldn't be banned for many reasons. In conclusion, this essay tries to argue that cell phones are valuable tools in schools.
Cell phones should be permitted in schools, because they can be very beneficial and practical in schools. Cell phones can be a life-saver in the case of an emergency. In New York, a violent incident has taken place. Fortunately, timely communication from a student using a cell phone saved a man who desperately needed medical attention (“Cell Phones in the Classroom”). Another student has assisted the police in arresting the suspect by giving timely updates of the criminal scene using a cell phone during the school lockdown.
Ever since incidents such as 9/11 and Columbine, high schools have started implementing new rules regarding cellphones. Cellphones attract the attention of building managers, teachers, parents, and students. Although teachers see them as a distraction and a way to cheat, they can be quite helpful to students. School districts should permit students to use cellular devices in school for purposes of improving their education and providing themselves with a sense of security. By permitting the use of cellphones in school, students can increase their knowledge and complete school work by using applications and other features on their smartphones.
The first reason to support that mobile phones should be banned in schools is that devices can be used to cheating for instance, text friends about answers during a test, take picture of test questions with mobile phones to send to friends, search the internet to answers during a test, and store information on mobile phones to look at during a test. It is suggested by Benenson Strategy Group (2008) indicated that 65 per c...