Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
strenghts and weaknesses to a literature review
peer review theory
what literature review
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: strenghts and weaknesses to a literature review
Introduction
Presenting scientific information to the lay public is difficult and one reason is the difference between popular or as sometimes called topical articles and peer reviewed or as sometimes called scientific articles. A popular article is written for a wide audience, while the peer reviewed article that appears in a scientific journal is targeted to a narrow audience in the scientific fields. This paper focuses on two different articles about the same subject – keeping the brain healthy and young through exercise. One article appeared in Newsweek and the other appeared in a peer reviewed journal. The Newsweek article, “Can You Build a Better Brain” by Sharon Begley, is written for a wide audience (Begley, 2011). The article
…show more content…
It’s almost as if the topical article says something at the top of the article, but it really means something else by the end. The topical article presents an interesting headline, but the article itself is not really about physical activity being related to positive brain growth and retention. The topical article is about all the things that can improve brain function in aging. It is really about all the things you can do to keep your brain from melting away when you become old such as playing brain games. The Begley article mentions so many things that can help you that it reads like a transcript after a visit from your mom or older sister. Begley advises to eat more vitamins, change to a Mediterranean diet, engage in physical exercise, read as much as you can, have a happy life with many friends, and the list of homilies continue (Begley 2011). By spreading out to cover all things, Begley article is like a shotgun blast.
Kramer and his co-writers point a rifle at the readers. The scope is narrow, pointed, and serious. The scientific article is like a trip to your doctor about a specific condition – your rotator cuff is torn, therefore you need shoulder surgery. When it comes time for a final conclusion, the science article has a concrete conclusion as
…show more content…
A number of reasons exist. Scientific journals are written for others in the same scientific field or allied fields. Topical stories in the popular media sources are meant to entertain first and then possibly inform, but always to support ratings or sales. The Newsweek article “Can You Build a Better Brain” exists to provide light, easily understandable information to the lay public. Newsweek writes to a wide audience, while articles appearing in Journal of Applied Physiology are written expressly for other highly educated members of that particular field of study. In this pattern, Begley seeks the widest audience and fires her thoughts wide like the proverbial shotgun. This is not a failing on her part, just a reality. Newsweek has a payroll to meet and stockholders to pay. Newsweek can’t do this writing at master’s level of English about a narrow
Do the authors appear to be treating the issue seriously? Does Brooks or Tannen seem to be more serious?
Overall this was a great book. I have a great deal of interest in the brain. It is a truly amazing and fascinating organ. Its complexity bewilders not only researchers, and many neuroscientists but me as well. I also have somewhat of a passion for fitness and to learn how beneficial exercise can be, not only to our body’s health but the brain as well. It gives me a new understanding about a “workout”. The author did a great job explaining all of the very complicated processes that are involved in exercise’s wondrous benefits. Even though some of the information may have been boring, the way it was presented was not. This book was a great read and overall I would recommend it to any interested in exercise or the brain.
Journalists simplify empirical research findings into consumer news stories by summarizing the study into interesting, nontechnical terms for the general public, potentially resulting in misleading information that deviates from the findings of the research (Morling, 2012). In the popular press article, "Mindfulness Meditation Can Help You Make Smarter Decisions", Christopher Bergland (2012) suggests that brief sessions of meditation can result in making "smarter" decisions. Bergland based this claim on a an empirical study conducted by Andrew Hafenbrack, Zoe Kinias, and Sigal Barsade, published in the peer-reviewed Journal of Psychological Science (2014). This article (Bergland, 2014) proposes that doing meditation prevents succumbing sunk cost bias, defined in the peer-reviewed article (Hafenbrack et al., 2014) as the propensity to continue and endeavor after money, time, or effort has been invested. Though Hafenbrack (2014) accurately portrays the findings of the study, the article puts too much of an emphasis on the conclusions while essential details from the methods are left out, potentially misleading readers.
In the final step of evaluating conclusions, the research community makes an active conversation about what they have discovered, and they write down details about the study. Then, they publish their work in various types of journal in order to let others read and learn from them. In the Katrevich et al. (2014) study, the conclusions were published in North American Journal of Psychology. In this way, scientists can figure out a new idea to be tested or one that will change the thinking about some topics (King, 2016).
...all the aspects of the experiments while Robertson didn't question anything he read about; the author from the second article questioned them based on outdated beliefs.
Caplan ability to recognize and specifically target his audience amplifies the effectiveness of the article in terms of engagement. In this case, Caplan’s posts his paper in The Chronicle of Higher Education, which is a newspaper targeted to college and university attendees (students, faculty, staff etc.). Therefore, now knowing his target audience, Caplan mentions different types of post-secondary educated individuals in his article, so that the specific audience feels engaged with the article. This is exemplified when Caplan uses the words, “students,” “medical experts,” “scientists,” and “scholars” throughout his
As far as I could remember I was never really any good at school. I couldn’t concentrate on things for no more than 5 minutes at a time I would either get discouraged or find it too easy and just give up. An author by the name of Carol Dweck wrote an article called “Brainology” in it Dweck describes that there are two types of mindsets fixed and growth. Those who are afraid to fail so they never try anything new are ones with a fixed mindset and the growth mindset are those who are not afraid to fail and find a new challenge an opportunity to learn something new. I guess you can say that I had a bit of a fixed mindset growing up I was always too scared to look stupid that I didn’t want to fail because I didn’t want to disappoint my siblings
In Carol Dweck’s “Brainology” the article explains how our brain is always being altered by our experiences and knowledge during our lifespan. For this Dweck conducted a research in what students believe about their own brain and their thoughts in their intelligence. They were questioned, if intelligence was something fixed or if it could grow and change; and how this affected their motivation, learning, and academic achievements. The response to it came with different points of views, beliefs, or mindset in which created different behavior and learning tendencies. These two mindsets are call fixed and growth mindsets. In a fixed mindset, the individual believes that intelligence is something already obtain and that is it. They worry if they
In “The Brain on trial”, David Eagleman (2011) recounts the horrifying events which occurred on August 1, 1966. Charles Whitman entered the University of Texas with a rifle and secured himself in the bell tower. He then proceeded to shoot and kill 13 people and injure 32 more. Whitman was also shot and killed; however, during his autopsy it was discovered that a tumor was pressing against his amygdala. According to Eagleman, “The amygdala is involved in emotional regulation, especially of fear and aggression” (2011). Therefore, Whitman was possibly experiencing a fundamental change in his emotions and personality due to the tumor. Though Whitman did not survive, his case still poses questions as to whether or not he should be held accountable for his actions; moreover, should Whitman have received the maximum punishment for the murder he committed? Charles Whitman may not have had control over the feelings of “rage and irrational thoughts” (2011) he was experiencing; however, the precision of the attack indicates he was well aware of the actions he was committing.
Martin, K. (2010) Brain Boost: sport and physical activity enhance children’s learning. Retrieved from http://www.dsr.wa.gov.au//assets/files/Research/Brain%20boost_emailer.pdf
In the November 2004 issue of National Geographic magazine, David Quammen had an article titled “Was Darwin Wrong?”. This article addresses the same overall topic as Lieberman and Vrba’s article in that they both informing people about the evolutionary theory of macroevolution. However, the difference is that “Was Darwin Wrong?” is a magazine article. While journal articles are for the academic reader who is being critical and reading to look further into a specific research field, magazine articles are those who are reading for pleasure. Quammen’s article is aimed towards readers who are reading the magazine just to learn new things and doing this out of pleasure. He uses simple and easy to use language that the common person can understand. This is evidenced by the sentences, “The rest of us generally agree. We plug our televisions into little wall sockets, measure a year by the length of Earth's orbit, and in many other ways live our lives based on the trusted reality of those theories” (Quammen 1). This greatly differs from the journal article that uses sentences like, “The most problematic case relevant to the definition of species selection is when differences in levels of organismal variability cause species sorting involving differential extinction in one of two sister groups” (Lieberman and Vrba 116). In comparison to the article about Stephen Jay Gould, this article is
He wants us to avoid exercising at all cost if we value our IQ. However, I did some research to figure out where his quotes came from and just as before, he references to the websites such as http://www.anvari.org/shortjoke, and http://www.guy-sports.com/humor/sports/sports_quotes.htm etc. which are intended to entertain public by making fun of athletes, celebrities, actors, and actresses. An article posted in the British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) titled “Future- Brain: Why exercise boosts IQ?” states that exercise releases certain neurotransmitters and growth hormones that enhance the overall health of a brain. It also boosts the blood and oxygen supply to the brain which provides it the energy to think and thus contributes to better concentration and memory. The article also illustrates a study done in German which found that older people enjoying mild exercises were half as likely to suffer from cognitive impairment as they age and scored better on attention and memory tests. Also, children walking to school concentrated better and got better test result than those given lifts in the
... Reynolds, Gretchen. "Mother’s Exercise May Boost Baby’s Brain." Well Mothers Exercise May Boost Babys Brain Comments. The New York Times, 20 Nov. 2013. Web. 31 Mar. 2014.
Actually, Hardwick's article was not at all faulty, just dry and altogether too short for the knowledge that it was trying to impart. It could have been three or four times longer and given ample attention to each point.
Chemically, the “ benefits of exercise come directly from its ability to reduce insulin resistance, reduce inflammation, and stimulate the release of growth factors—chemicals in the brain that affect the health of brain cells, the growth of new blood vessels in the brain, and even the abundance and survival of new brain cells” (Godman). This process, known as neurogenesis, counters the primary ramifications of aging on the brain, and helps with mental clarity, decision making skills, and organization. In the long run, this continuous growth of new blood vessels and the survival of new brain cells aid