Essay PreviewMore ↓
Throughout the speech, the Former President George W Bush strives to empower Americans by instructing them to remain resolute, but to “go back to [their] lives and routines”. He uses the personal pronoun we and the common pronoun us repeatedly to indicate that the people of the United States, who either saw the event on television or experienced this event firsthand, were and still are involved in this national tragedy. He implements this emotional appeal into his speech to involve all Americans--people living in the United States of America, regardless of their ethnicity, race, or culture, and to acknowledge that the American people have endured this together, and that they will continue to advance after this event with stronger resolve, stronger than ever. In addition, he implements personification to motivate and empower the American people. “Our nation, this generation, will lift a dark threat of violence from our people and our future” (Bush, 2001). “This generation”, again a synonym for the American people, with its unwavering resolve, will fight for its freedom persistently. He intimates that the future of America and of democratic freedom is in the hands of the American people: that the American people have the power to control their fate. The next sentence leads into America’s “philanthropically” democratic nature: “We will rally the world to this cause, by our efforts and by our courage” (Bush, 2001). This statement has been followed up by action only a few years later, when the United States intervened in the Iraqi War, Libyan Revolution, and even more civil wars to ensure the freedom of citizens from dictatorships, which in Islāmic nations, were militant groups, like the Hamas and Taliban. Lastly, the president utilized anaphora, specifically a tripartite structure, by affirming that the American people “will not tire”, “will not falter”, and “will not fail”. He implies that the American people will relentlessly fight for the worldwide establishment of peace and democratic institutions, a promise which America has kept even in the face of its own national crisis.
How to Cite this Page
"Bush and Blair 9-11 Speeches: Analysis of Rhetorical Devices." 123HelpMe.com. 23 Oct 2019
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- The day was September 11th, 2001, a moment in history that will never be forgotten by any American living at the time. It was in the early morning hours on this day that our nation experienced the single most devastating terrorist attack ever carried out on American soil. Images of planes crashing into the World Trade Center, news coverage of buildings on fire, and images of building rubble will forever be imprinted into the history of this great nation. However, it was on one of the darkest days for America that one of the most impassioned speeches ever given by a United States president was spoken.... [tags: George W. Bush, President of the United States]
749 words (2.1 pages)
- Rhetorical Strategies Used by President George Bush After the September 11 Terrorist Attacks On September 11, 2001, the Islamist terrorist group known as al-Qaeda launched a series of terrorist attacks on the United States of America, specifically in the New York City and Washington D.C areas. Nineteen al-Qaeda terrorists hijacked four planes with the intention of using them as suicide attacks that would crash those planes into designated buildings, or targets. Two of the four passenger jets were flown into the twin towers of the World Trade Center in New York City, both of which collapsed entirely within two hours of being hit.... [tags: Rhetorical Strategies ]
1815 words (5.2 pages)
- While giving speeches, people use certain rhetorical devices with the intention of obtaining a certain outcome. In Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar, Mark Antony stands on the capitol steps, addressing Rome’s countrymen. He speaks on the demerits of Brutus on March 15, 44 B.C. at the capitol building in Rome, just after Brutus assassinated a beloved ruler. In his speech, Antony urges the Romans to recognize Julius Caesar’s merits and Brutus and the conspirator’s immoral act, all while adopting the persona of an emotional friend of the people.... [tags: Rhetorical Analysis]
918 words (2.6 pages)
- In this paper I am going to discuss the rhetorical appeals, as well as the argumentative structure, audience and purpose set forth by George W. Bush in his September 27 speech in Flagstaff, Arizona. More specifically I will refer to the rhetorical appeals of ethos, pathos and logos, and explain how they are used to gain the support and attention of the audience and further the further the purpose of the speech. As I explain these appeals I will also give an insight into the argumentative structure and why it is apparent in this particular speech.... [tags: Rhetorical Analysis of Speech]
1144 words (3.3 pages)
- Introduction Advertising is a prominent genre in virtually all contemporary societies. It is closely connected with social economy, enterprise development, market exploitation, foreign trade and people’s daily life. It is ubiquitous and widely disseminated through newspapers, magazines, journals, television, radios, posters, etc. We may be often annoyed by advertisements, however, sometimes we may find them exceedingly useful. Anyway, advertisements have played and are playing an important role in this commercial era.... [tags: Advertising, Memetic Approach]
1895 words (5.4 pages)
- On April 9, 2003 United States tanks stormed through Baghdad, Iraq. U.S. troops, then, toppled a giant statue of Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein in central Baghdad, which sent the Iraqi citizens into jubilee (Rampton 1). The Iraq War, or government's coined 'Operation Iraqi Freedom,' had finally arrived after declaring war on March 19, 2003. The U.S.-British coalition to invade Iraq and dethrone Hussein's dictatorship has been both a beneficial and detrimental political move. A war that originated because of Hussein's reluctance to weapons inspections now has become a messy situation where U.S.-British troops are dying more after major combat has ceased.... [tags: War on Terrorism ]
5130 words (14.7 pages)
- Writers and speakers have mastered the skill of rhetoric, an art that effectively persuades an audience, by communicating a point across and leaning them towards the desired side of an argument. They do so by using rhetorical devices such as logos to show the facts, common sense, and use testimonies. Ethos to establish the credibility of the writer or speaker, and pathos to draw on the values and emotions of the audience. In a similar manner, we use these rhetoric appeals to join certain discourse communities, giving us a sense of belonging and distinction from other groups.... [tags: Rhetoric, Question, Ethos, Son]
1148 words (3.3 pages)
- During the 1700’s people in America were experiencing the great awaking. Many ministers in this period used rhetorical appeals to get across to their congregation. Jonathan Edwards was one of the most well know pastors during this time. In 1741, he preached a sermon-later titled Sinner in the Hands of an Angry God-to his congregation by using rhetorical appeals he got his point across to many unconverted men. Edwards uses rhetorical appeals: pathos, ethos, and logos to create rhetorical appeals.... [tags: Rhetoric, Rhetorical techniques, Allusion, Logos]
986 words (2.8 pages)
- Rhetorical devices are used in almost everything that we read, watch, or listen to. Literary Devices (2014) defines rhetoric as “Rhetoric is technique of using language effectively and persuasively in spoken or written form. It is an art of discourse, which studies and employs various methods to convince, influence or please an audience” (para. 1). While the history of rhetoric dates back to ancient Greece and was reserved to be used by only noble people today we see it used everywhere. Some of the more common rhetorical devices that are used today include oxymoron, sarcasm, irony, and contradiction.... [tags: language, discourse, pathos]
858 words (2.5 pages)
- on Religion: Rhetorical Devices In Twilight of the Idols Nietzsche discusses his views on Christianity, other philosophers, and authors of his time. Nietzsche’s main focus, however, is on Christianity and how its actions and views are means to an end. He uses eloquent diction that sometimes loses the reader (he makes up for his articulate word usage with elementary sentences which describe his views very efficiently) along with syntax which is very informal - for the time - to describe his views on subjects quite exquisitely.... [tags: English Literature Essays]
930 words (2.7 pages)
In contrast, Former British Prime Minister Tony Blair took a different approach in his speech. He attempted to console the bereaved and devastated by assuring them that severe punitive action would be taken. He utilized mild invective and parallel structure to provide consolation to not only Americans, but also terror-stricken citizens worldwide affected by the terrorist attacks. By mentioning “the fanatic” he alluded to the terrorists, whom he generalized as believers of the Islāmic faith, who claimed to be proponents of jihad, “a holy war waged on behalf of Islam as a religious duty” (Merriam Webster, 2012). He maintained that the “destruction of the machinery of terrorism” (Blair, 2001) would increase the “chance of a better future” for everyone. He wanted to reassure people that their safety would not be compromised because he would take immediate action by punishing the terrorists and eradicating terrorism from the roots to prevent any such aggression from occurring in the future. In addition, Blair utilized parallel structure when he stated that “We were with you at the first” and “We will stay with you to the last” (Blair, 2001). The first of the two statements was an allusion to the coalition of Allied Powers during World War I and World War II, in which Britain, United States, and many other nations were involved in a pro-democracy struggle against the Axis Powers, which advocated highly centralized governments with no involvement by its citizens. He intimated that the United Kingdom would stand by America’s side until democracy was achieved globally and tyrannical governments were overthrown. This statement was reassuringly directed at Americans specifically, in contrast with the focus of the entire speech, which was aimed at people worldwide.
Similarly, President Bush and Prime Minister Blair strived to augment awareness of terrorism as a global threat [to democracy], empower people, and reassure the bereaved through expressive oratory. However, Prime Minister Blair utilized mildly incendiary language to foment American patriotism and promote anti-terrorist views. In contrast, President Bush used milder, yet more passionate language than Blair’s to empower and uplift the American people, to instruct them to remember the life-changing event of September 11, 2001, and to encourage them to uphold the values of democracy.
In response to the terrorist attacks launched on the Pentagon in Arlington, Virginia and the World Trade Centers in New York on September 11, 2001, Former United States President George W Bush delivered an optimistic speech evoking pathos, and utilizing anaphora and personification. Former British Prime Minister Tony Blair responded to the terrorist attacks a few weeks later, with mild diatribe and parallelism to affirm his opinion of the catastrophe.