Julius Caesar Tragic Hero Analysis

812 Words2 Pages

A tragic hero is a literacy character in a play who makes an error that leads to their own downfall. There are four aspects that tragic heroes have in common which includes: a tragic dilemma, tragic flaw, peripeteia, and anagnorisis. In William Shakespeare’s famous dramatic tragedy “Julius Caesar”, there were downfalls of many characters which led to arguments about who the tragic hero really was. Some critics of the play argue that Julius Caesar is the tragic hero, while others argue that Marcus Brutus is the tragic hero. Considering Brutus’ flaws, positive traits, and his role in the play, his character best fits the requirements of Aristotle’s definition of a tragic hero.
Tragic dilemmas are cases in which someone has to choose between options that will lead to horrific results for the character. The tragic dilemma Brutus had to face was choosing between taking no action against Caesar, or murdering his best friend. If Brutus had taken no action against Caesar, Caesar would be crowned as king and there might be a possible reign of tyranny in Rome. Brutus had to decide whether to not to agree to assassinate him even before Caesar had done anything wrong because he was scared of Caesar’s ambitions. He was scared of what would happen to Rome if …show more content…

All of his actions was made to benefit someone else and not himself. He had murdered Caesar for the good of Rome and not to deceive Caesar. Even Caesar’s best friend, Mark Anthony, acknowledged that Brutus was still “the noblest Roman of them all” after the assassination of Caesar. In the play, Brutus expressed his true intentions by stating, “Not that I loved Caesar less, but that I loved Rome more.” He had to face a tragic dilemma with one of the option being to take no action against Caesar. Although he knew the consequences he would have to face, he went with the second option because he wanted to help the

Open Document