Jacoby starts his essay by providing a background history on flogging by relating the punishment to crimes that would be insignificant in today’s society. He claims that imprisonment has become an “all purpose punishment” used for violent and nonviolent crimes alike (193). Citing a plethora of facts and research, Jacoby argues that the prison system is ineffective and too costly. To support his claim he advocates for a system of public humiliation and degradation to deter lower class criminals from becoming repeat offenders. Jacoby realizes that flogging’s “crimes of the day” are not our crimes, but maintains that flogging would be effective in current society and not any more brutal than being caged (194).
Jacoby is arguing for reintroducing a system of flogging. The main support of his argument stems from the ineffectiveness of the prison system. A statement by John DiIulio shows that, “about three of every four convicted criminals are on the streets without meaningful probation” (Jacoby 193). Jacoby uses this statement to show that most low level offenders do not receive adequate consequence to divert them from f...
... middle of paper ...
...gging “and determined to be inadequate. The material used to support the inadequacy is inadequate itself. Statistical data lacks credibility and opinions from authoritative figures do little in comparison to support the reasoning. Jacoby’s solution is to implement flogging into the punishment of low level offenders from becoming hardened criminals, but the solution falls short, failing to discuss the moral issues surrounding it. Jeff Jacoby attempts to replace an ineffective system with an outdated one, ultimately failing to convince the reader that flogging is a reasonable and practical solution.
Jacoby, Jeff. “Bring Back Flogging” Boston Globe. 26 Feb. 1978.
Rpt. in Current Issues and Enduring Questions: A Guide to Critical Thinking and Argument, with Readings. 9th ed. Ed. Sylvan Barnet and Hugo Bedau. Boston: St. Martin’s, 2011. 192-194. Print
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- In the article “Bring Back Flogging” Jeff Jacoby writes that prison inmates are given a disservice more than people who used to be flogged in the 1600s. Flogging was a punishment that used for a wide variety of crimes and was usually done publicly with the victim being whipped an appointed number of times. Jacoby writes that flogging is a more educational experience than going to jail because it is an experience that the criminal will never forget. He goes on to say that another reason why prisons are obsolete is because they are so expensive and often times the prisoners do not come out reformed.... [tags: Prison, Crime, Critical thinking, Logic]
900 words (2.6 pages)
- Flogging…What is it. What purpose does it serve. For those of us who have never heard of flogging, flogging refers to “beating with a whip or strap or rope as a form of punishment” (“Flogging” 1). Throughout the 1600s, flogging was utilized by “Boston’s Puritan Forefathers” (Jacoby 1) as a method of corporal punishment for various crimes. Progressing forward, Jeff Jacoby, columnist for The Boston Globe, provides readers with his view of “Boston’s Forefathers’” system of punishment in his essay, “Bring Back Flogging.” Within the contents of his work, Jacoby describes how flogging was utilized as punishment in its day.... [tags: Article Review, Jeff Jacoby]
1040 words (3 pages)
- In “Bring Back Flogging” Jeff Jacoby, a columnist for the Boston Globe, presents the use of corporal punishment as an alternative to the current system of imprisonment. Published in February of 1997, the article states that flogging would be a more effective means of punishment than jail. He insists it would be less expensive and serve as a deterrent to first time offenders. Jacoby’s thoughts on prison reform are legitimate, but his reasoning behind the use of corporal punishment is flawed. He fails to provide reasonable support for his argument which leaves the reader guessing as to the seriousness of his claim.... [tags: Criminal Justice]
1071 words (3.1 pages)
- Imprisonment VS flogging within the world, comparing the amount of criminals from today to 100 years ago, it is assumed that the numbers have gone up drastically. In “Bring Back Flogging” by Jeff Jacoby, he starts his essay off with giving out the history of flogging, beginning with what the criminal did and then explaining the type of punishment that the criminal would receive. While reading “Bring Back Flogging” it is shown how one would get beaten for blasphemy while one would be put into prison today.... [tags: Prison, Criminal justice, Punishment]
999 words (2.9 pages)
- In Jeff Jacoby’s essay Bring Flogging Back, he discusses whether flogging is the more humane punishment compared to prison. Jacoby uses clear and compelling evidence to describe why prisons are a terrible punishment, but he lacks detail and information on why flogging is better. In the essay he explains how crime has gotten out of hand over the past few decades, which has lead to the government building more prisons to lock up more criminals. His effort to prove that current criminal punishment is not perfect or even effective is nicely done, but he struggled with discussing ways that flogging could lower the crime rates and provide a safer environment for America.... [tags: Argument Analysis]
1009 words (2.9 pages)
- Critical Analysis In “Bring Back Flogging”, Jeff Jacoby argues why the current criminal justice system in America is not effective or successful. As a solution, he suggests that America should bring back the old fashioned form of punishment once used by the puritans, flogging, as an alternative to imprisonment (198). This article originally appeared in the op-ed section of the Boston Globe newspaper. Therefore, the primary audience of this article is people who want to read arguments about controversial topics and have probably read some of his other articles.... [tags: Criminal justice, Crime, Prison, Punishment]
1362 words (3.9 pages)
- Bring Back Flogging" During seventeenth century flogging was a popular punishment for convicted people among Boston's Puritans. Fortunately, those times have passed and brutal and inhuman flogging was replaced by imprisonment. Columnist for the Boston Globe, Jeff Jacoby in his essay "Bring back flogging" asserts that flogging is superior to imprisonment and advocates flogging as an excellent means of punishment. He is convinced that flogging of offenders after their first conviction can prevent them from going into professional criminal career and has more educational value than imprisonment.... [tags: Personal Essays]
476 words (1.4 pages)
- Every civilized society makes laws that protect its values, and the society expects every single citizen to obey these laws. Whenever a citizen of a certain society breaks one of these laws, the rulers of the society dish out punishments they dim fit for the kind of crime committed. With this kind of justice system in place, criminals are either locked up in prison cells, whipped, or exiled from the society. In the essay, “Bring Back Flogging”, columnist Jeff Jacoby argues that flogging is much more superior to imprisonment and should be brought back as a method of punishing crime offenders like the Puritans did in the past.... [tags: Prison, Criminal justice, Punishment]
1092 words (3.1 pages)
- Circuses use whips and cages to train animals like lions and bears, force them to perform for audiences. It appears that a columnist for The Boston Globe, Jeff Jacoby, is in favor of using the same combination for criminals. He published an essay named “Bring Back Flogging” on the op-ed page of The Boston Globe on February 20. 1997. The essay holds a serious discussion of prison system of the United States, identified it as a costly, insecure and useless. Then he suggests that we should replace the system with a method that we used centuries ago-flogging, or at least add it to the list of penalties.... [tags: Prison, Punishment, Criminal justice, Penology]
1541 words (4.4 pages)
- “Bring Back Foolishness” Jeff Jacobys’ essay, entitled “Bring Back Flogging” was, in my sincere opinion, poorly constructed. There are numerous instances where I felt that he had either not supported his premises with valid information or had negated his support in later sentences. The essay begins by drawing forth images of Puritan punishment. He cites two instances of punishment, which were particularly torturous and radical in nature. He then draws a comparison between this inhumane punishment and imprisonment by stating with irony that, “Now we practice a more enlightened, more humane way of disciplining wrong doers: we lock them up in cages.” His use of the word “cages” was an a... [tags: essays research papers fc]
1217 words (3.5 pages)