The Brethren, co-authored by Bob Woodward and Scott Armstrong, is an in-depth documentary of the United States Supreme Court from 1969 to 1975, under the leadership of Warren Burger. The book attempts to present the reader with what "really" goes on in the Supreme Court. It describes the conferences, the personality of justices, and how justice's feel toward each other, items which are generally hidden from the public. This book is comparable to a lengthy newspaper article. Written more as a source of information than of entertainment, The Brethren is the brutal truth, but not boring. The storytelling is clearly slanted against the Burger court but the overall quality of the work makes the bias forgivable. Readers learn how the members of the Court see their mandate and also see the enormous role the clerks play in shaping the rulings of the Court.
The Brethren shows the flowering of Nixon's four judicial selections: Warren E. Burger, Harry A. Blackmun, Lewis F. Powell, Jr., and William H. Rehnquist. The final chapter introduces President Ford's only appointment, John Paul Stevens. Burger was Nixon's first appointee, replacing retiring Chief Justice Earl Warren. By the late 1960s, federal courts and school districts were struggling with court ordered busing. Once Burger joined the court, the longtime Nixon friend clearly showed an interest in moving away from these liberal decisions. However, Woodward goes to great lengths to illustrate how Burger's indecision, lack of tact, poor legal reasoning and overall gauche demeanor hampers his own effectiveness.
The book takes heavy aim at what author feels are Burger's negative personality traits. The Chief's pettiness manifested ...
... middle of paper ...
...ch as ideology, compromise, persuasive arguments, and even interaction with the clerks. It could be used as a textbook for a course on the Supreme Court. Trust in the political system was both strengthened and weakened by this book. I was impressed by how difficult it is to confirm an appointment to the Supreme Court. Not just anyone can become a Supreme Court justice, but selection is limited to political insiders who don't always know what America is all about. A book like this keeps Washington on its toes. It reminds politicians that someone is always watching, and even the closest colleague may be willing to talk. The average American probably wouldn't read this book. If they did, they would only pay attention to cases that could possibly pertain to them. It could definitely make some readers angry and confused, causing them to question the whole political system.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- I. Basic Situation The Brethren is an entertaining book with a suspenseful plot and intentionally misleading details that add to its overall feeling of tense excitement and engaging uncertainty. It has captivating details that keep the reader continually predicting what will happen next. Furthermore, The Brethren is a compelling book because of its overall story line, which involves three felons at a minimum-security federal prison and their attempts at extorting money from rich men who inadvertently fueled their corrupt scheme by responding to a personals ad in the back of a gay magazine.... [tags: essays research papers]
1987 words (5.7 pages)
- “The Nine: Inside the Secret World of the Supreme Court is a book written by Jeffrey Toobin. Jeffrey Toobin is a staff writer for the New Yorker, as well as, a CNN senior legal analyst. “The Nine” starts in the Reagan and ends in 2007. Toobin discusses all the major cases that the Supreme Court made a ruling on during that time period. He also talks about each of the Justices, their personalities and how they came to make the decisions they did. One of the things that I found most interesting about the book was that Toobin described how the Justices became Justices.... [tags: inner workings of the Supreme Court]
1205 words (3.4 pages)
- The Supreme Court, which sees almost 150 petitions per week, called cert petitions, must carefully select the cases that they want to spend their time and effort on (Savage 981). If they didn’t select them carefully, the nine justices would quickly be overrun, so they have put in place a program to weed through the court cases to pick out the small number they will discuss. There are a few criteria that are used to judge whether or not a case will be tried. The first is whether or not the lower courts decided the case based on another one of the Supreme Court’s decisions for they will investigate these in order to withhold or draw back their conclusion that they made in their court case.... [tags: Supreme Court of the United States]
2261 words (6.5 pages)
- Over the course of the history of the United States government, the judiciary branch has evolved and changed with time. Specifically, the Supreme Court of the United States has arguably evolved the most, changing its motivations and philosophies overtime as the country around it has evolved. Additionally, the amount of external political influence of the Supreme Court has also increased as the courts began to modernize over time along with the ideas and views of the people, all while trying to maintain the judiciary branch within the scope of the Constitution and law.... [tags: Supreme Court of the United States]
1568 words (4.5 pages)
- Nature’s Judicial Process in the Supreme Court consists of decision-making; based on the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court. Although the Supreme Court has the capability to decide all extended cases; it also has the power to ascend under the Constitution, which allows the Supreme Court its jurisdiction in the Judicial Branch of government. The Judicial Process interpret the laws that are established in the Supreme Court; thus, allowing the Court to exercise its power by shifting its system under the Constitutional laws of the United States.... [tags: American Government, Supreme Court]
1160 words (3.3 pages)
- The Supreme Court has made numerous decisions that have impacted the United States Government as well as the citizenry of the United States. The Marshall court is recognized as making a decision on the most important case in the history of the Supreme Court. William Marbury was to be appointed to the position of Justice of the Peace in the District of Columbia, but his appointment was never fulfilled. Marbury then filed a writ of mandamus to attempt and force the new Secretary of State, James Madison to deliver the appointment.... [tags: Supreme Court of the United States]
1139 words (3.3 pages)
- It was 1803 when Chief Justice Marshall used Marbury v. Madison to constitute the “legal principle of judicial review” (Marbury v. Madison). Judicial review allows the Supreme Court to rule on an issue concerning rather another branch of government’s legislation is constitutional or not. This is a basic definition, somewhat generic if you will. What is the deeper meaning/ use of judicial review. How does it affect modern day society. These are important questions to ask when one is trying to comprehend how a federal system operates, and advances with its society.... [tags: Judicial Review, Supreme Court]
1014 words (2.9 pages)
- The Supreme Court At the apex of our federal court system stands the United States Supreme Court. It stands as the ultimate authority in constitutional interpretation and its decision can be changed only by a constitutional amendment. Two documents are responsible for its creation which is the Constitution, which explicitly creates the Supreme Court, and the Judiciary Act of September 24, 1789. The Supreme Court is the only court named in the constitution laying out the Courts basic jurisdiction, identifying the mode of selection and tenure for justices.... [tags: Supreme Court Governmental Congress Essays]
3505 words (10 pages)
- The Supreme Court *Purpose of the Supreme Court* The United States Supreme Court consists of the Chief Justice of the United States and eight associate justices. The Supreme Court each year hears a limited number of the cases it is asked to decide. Those cases may begin in the federal or state courts, and they usually involve very important questions about the Constitution or federal law. Appealing the state courts decision, you can ask it to be taken to the Supreme Court. To get their higher opinion.... [tags: Supreme Court Justice Constitution Judicial]
1220 words (3.5 pages)
- Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. vs. Sawyer Also commonly referred to as The Steel Seizure Case, it was a United States Supreme Court decision that limited the power of the President of the United States to seize private property in the absence of either specifically enumerated authority under Article Two of the US Constitution or statutory authority conferred on him by Congress. The Majority decision was that the President had no power to act except in those cases expressly or implicitly authorized by the Constitution or an act of Congress.... [tags: Supreme Court Judge Court]
1759 words (5 pages)