More handpicked essays just for you.
Effect of media and films on society
Effect of media and films on society
Effect of media and films on society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Effect of media and films on society
Our culture has been dictated by movies. Behavior, outlook, and even fashions are influenced by major motion pictures. A good film can give you a thoughtful experience like a piece of art can hand a new perspective. An age old question is derived from this; What constitutes a good film? How should a film's quality be measured? The movie industry is as volatile as music; there is no substantial way to quantify quality and it's entirely subjective. What I consider a studio's magnum opus could be a schmuck you write off as, “Worse than Uwe Boll.” This doesn't break the point that we are human and we strive for greatness. Over time we developed unwritten standards to differentiate between lazy film-making and art that moves people. After all, we wouldn't like it if a bad film was made popular and had its poison polluting our lake of pop culture. How would we be influenced? What terrible ideas will be instilled into our heads? What will future generations think? Thus is the importance of film criticism; to discern grimy film-makers and encourage healthy care of the lake in a competitive...
Such a situation, under these assumptions, puts the audience in an apparently perverse situation, and it is therefore hardly surprising that the infamous Hays code of the thirties moved to ensure that "the sympathy of the audience shall never be thrown to the side of crime, wrongdoing, evil or sin(4)." The assumption of audience identity with the hero was never unproblematic, and of course the classical Hollywood model of filmmaking partially outlined above never existed entirely without challenge. Nevertheless, it is clear that up to the fifties the classical Hollywood model was relatively applicable and that challenges to it were largely ineffective. However, beyond the fifties, the model became increasingly irrelevant. The reasons for the downfall of the classical paradigm are complex, and related to economic changes within the industry (the forced dismantling of the vertically integrated studio system that placed production, distribution and exhibition roles under the one organisation) as well as wider cultural shifts that occurred during the sixties (the widespread social upheaval and increasing prominence of counter-cultural challenges to mainstream ideologies) ....
The television's new “golden age” is now upon us. As the internet continues to make filmmaking more accessible to public, Hollywood will continue being one of the biggest and greatest influences on today’s society and politics. It is much easier to create and share your ideas through film than ever before. Independent studios before, greatly expanding the number of debates and arguments people have access to. Never has the power to express yourself and your views through film been so great, and we are better off for it.
One could easily dismiss movies as superficial, unnecessarily violent spectacles, although such a viewpoint is distressingly pessimistic and myopic. In a given year, several films are released which have long-lasting effects on large numbers of individuals. These pictures speak
Movies suck these days. All Hollywood seems to care about anymore is making profitable movies, not thinking twice about what the movie might actually be about. Whether it’s another special effects-ridden clunker, a giddy romantic comedy, or another lame-plotted action flick, they just don’t seem to get it. Although a small handful of films over a year’s time are occasionally worth seeing, for the most part it’s all about making money and not about the true art that filmmaking can be.
Imagine a world in which presidential debates were not televised, and a person would have to read the newspaper to get all their political news. Just how different would our country be today? Television has a huge effect on American politics. It is often the main source from which people derive their reasoning and opinions from. There is a plethora of news television channels to choose from and gather information from. These channels often run all times of the day. Keeping American citizens up to date on all developing news. Television properly helps U.S citizens vet and get to know the candidate, as well as the candidate's plan.
One of the essential qualities, I believe, a true cinephile must possess is an ability to enjoy the not so finer things in film. A movie lover must be able to watch a stupid, poor quality picture and still have a good time. Otherwise, that person risks becoming a stereotypical, pretentious, snooty film nerd. Thankfully, I have not yet lost that indispensable feature. I can still enjoy clearly mediocre (or worse) movies, such as Nacho Libre.
The invention of the television has had an impact on all aspects of American's lives. It has affected how we work, interact with others, and our foreign relations. One part of American society that it has especially affected is presidential elections. Television has impacted who is elected and why they were elected. Since the 1960's television has served as a link between the American public and presidential elections that allows the candidate to appear more human and accountable for their actions; consequently this has made television a positive influence on presidential elections. But it has also had a negative affect on elections, making presidential candidates seem like celebrities at times and making it easier to publicize mistakes made by candidates.
It is of great importance to understand the societal values present at the time and place in which a person lives; it is one’s social responsibility. One does not necessarily have to agree with modern societal values, and, in fact, often different media outlets present differing or conflicting views that challenge norms or changing ideals. It is simply a person’s responsibility to learn about the different societal perspectives (both mainstream and counter-culture) to better understand the world he or she lives in, create his or her own informed view point, and to be a socially aware citizen. Movies (and other media) are an ideal source of much cultural information. They express opinions in promotion of certain societal expectations, against mainstream societal expectations or making fun of societal expectations, and/or some space in between.
Stanley, Robert H. The Movie Idiom: Film as a Popular Art Form. Illinois: Waveland Press, Inc. 2011. Print
In recent times, such stereotyped categorizations of films are becoming inapplicable. ‘Blockbusters’ with celebrity-studded casts may have plots in which characters explore the depths of the human psyche, or avant-garde film techniques. Titles like ‘American Beauty’ (1999), ‘Fight Club’ (1999) and ‘Kill Bill 2’ (2004) come readily into mind. Hollywood perhaps could be gradually losing its stigma as a money-hungry machine churning out predictable, unintelligent flicks for mass consumption. While whether this image of Hollywood is justified remains open to debate, earlier films in the 60’s and 70’s like ‘Bonnie and Clyde’ (1967) and ‘Taxi Driver’ (1976) already revealed signs of depth and avant-garde film techniques. These films were successful as not only did they appeal to the mass audience, but they managed to communicate alternate messages to select groups who understood subtleties within them.
In a country where there was no such thing as a “movie” or a “photo”, America had no idea what they were missing out on. Until, came the era of the motion picture industry. This is also known as, cinema. It was captivating for the American culture and engaged people’s emotions and mentally conveyed them into a whole other world. From looking at the very start of the motion picture industry it is easy to understand that there were several factors that went into not only the development, but the evolvement of American culture overall.
Film and literature are two media forms that are so closely related, that we often forget there is a distinction between them. We often just view the movie as an extension of the book because most movies are based on novels or short stories. Because we are accustomed to this sequence of production, first the novel, then the motion picture, we often find ourselves making value judgments about a movie, based upon our feelings on the novel. It is this overlapping of the creative processes that prevents us from seeing movies as distinct and separate art forms from the novels they are based on.
As with all industries, Hollywood’s business revolves around making money. In the quest for monetary excellence morals can become sidelined and painful stereotypes can become revisited. On the other side, a filmmaker may use their influential position in order to shed light on a controversial issue to remind the public of consequences of past mistakes. In a paradoxical way, when Hollywood creates altruistic and feel good films the making of the films may unintentionally harm other cultures or societies. In the pursuit of socially progressive films, Hollywood disregards the wellbeing of some in order to make others look better in comparison. Highlighting t...
American movies shape our conception of American society and its individuals being a mere reflection of our society, connecting to its audience, and contribution to mass communications. As America continues to grow in its population and diversity,
It can come to define who’s being influenced. Movies are a huge source of influence, because they’re also a form of entertainment. Movies can influence us because they influence storytelling, entertainment, and culture. Works Cited http://novan.com/storytel.htm http://www.bubblews.com/news/1030442-influence-of-movies http://historymatters.gmu.edu/mse/film/socialhist.html http://tribecafilm.com/future-of-film/513103f31c7d761e9300000b-storytelling-audiences-an http://www.nzherald.co.nz/entertainment/news/article