Analysis Of Mary Louise Adams's Article 'Excerpts From The Trouble With Normal'

As highlighted by the author, Mary Louise Adams in her article, “Excerpts from The Trouble with Normal”, ‘a norm’ “can be defined as something that is usual, typical or standardized” (Hacking, Adams, 2003). Norms are often already so established that most individuals do not realize how much they have shaped society and the people who live in it. Audrey Lord tells us that being a “White, thin, young, heterosexual, Christian, male” defines the characteristics of being “normal” and “privileged,” in which she calls “the mythical norm” (Perry, 2011). We use our sexuality, race and class as a way of giving ourselves an identity for the world to see. This identity will ultimately allow us to understand our place in the world and give

It is simply not enough to just state your sexuality without constantly trying to prove it to people. The Egan V Canada case shares the story of inequality between gender and heteronormativity. The case brings to our attention that the gender we choose to identify ourselves by should be accepted by people and the law. We are born to believe that sexuality and gender was bred in us biologically, therefore being anything but normal is unnatural and wrong. In reference to the article, ‘Girls Wear Pink and Boys Wear Blue, the authors, reminds us that “oppression emerges from the concept of gender and the process of gendering” (Newman & White, 2012). The two authors argue that there is nothing in nature that distinctively determines a single colour that should represent one gender. The colours pink and blue have separated the female and male gender for decades because it became a socially and cultural acceptance. I argue that there is nothing in our society that proves that heterosexuality is normal. If we strip gender down straight to the core and ignore religion and class, it is easy to see that society has normalized gender to fit in with the trends of