Book Banning: Against The Law Essay

Book Banning: Against The Law Essay

Length: 1292 words (3.7 double-spaced pages)

Rating: Strong Essays

Open Document

Essay Preview

Books on the Wrong Side of the Law
Every year, groups call to arms for the removal of written works. They label the book too dangerous for young readers. Unfortunately, these incensed groups refuse to acknowledge the entirety of the situation before jumping with both feet into this metaphorical river. This blind censorship needs to cease. Banned books should be allowed because the books give insight to the culture at the time, because banning brings attention to books that someone did not want anyone else to see, and because people have rights.
Schools should not ban books in their libraries because the books merely reflect the culture of the times. In To Kill a Mockingbird by Harper Lee, society still lived under the ominous shadow of prejudice. Books like this help students realize how people acted in those times when they read about the treatment of blacks. Mark Twain has also received heavy criticism lately for his works. Calling a Native American an ‘Injun’ made complete sense in the year that Twain wrote the novel. His culture found it commonplace to use the language that he did. Anything else sounds farcical. Consider how people viewed flappers in that era. Adults found them overtly sexual and disgusting at the time. If a young girl today wore a flapper-styled outfit, she would find no strange looks or scorn. Michael Cart wrote about his town and how the librarian looked at some volumes and “regarded them as dirty and I suppose in that time and place—Logansport, Indiana, in the mid-1950s—a majority of the local citizens would have agreed with her” (133). Fickle and capricious, the will of the public changes as often as weather in Kansas. In the span of fifty years, acceptable material finds a revised def...


... middle of paper ...


...ttle to no offense in another. Challenging a book causes the media to rally around the piece and encourage more people to read it, thus defeating the purpose of banning. America was founded on the demand for freedoms and those freedoms are infringed by banning books. Leave written works alone! Never support the banning or censoring of a book.



Works Cited
American Library Association. “Banned and/or Challenged Books from the Radcliffe Publishing Course Top 100 Novels of the 20th Century.” ALA.org. Web. 20 Oct. 2011.
Cart, Michael. “Voice of Youth Advocates.” Gale Power Search. Web. Page 133. 26 Oct. 2011.
KidSPEAK!. “Where Kids Speak Up for Free Speech.” kidsSPEAK! Web. 26 Oct. 2011.
Martinson, David L. “The Education Digest.” HW Wilson. Web. 2007. Page 43-50. 25 Oct. 2011.
Sebelius, Nancy. Personal interview. 26 Oct. 2011.

Need Writing Help?

Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.

Check your paper »

Censorship and Book Banning Essay

- "Censorship cannot eliminate evil. It can only kill freedom. We believe Americans have the right to buy, stores have the right to sell, authors have the right to write and publishers have the right to publish constitutionally protected material. Period." (“Banned Books and Authors”). Harry Hoffman, president of Walden Book Co., Inc., is accurate in this aspect. When books are censored or banned, they are not eliminated from society; however, their message emanates to create an impact. Even if the public conceals the content in these books, the victims that these censors sequester from these works are rarely unexposed to what is being censored to them....   [tags: Literacy ]

Strong Essays
1821 words (5.2 pages)

Book Banning and First Amendment Right Essay

- ... 20, 2013). As this concerns books, people should have the freedom to choose what they want to read and what they don't want to read. By banning books, our basic rights as US citizens are abused. Book banning affects many different people, from the people who read books to the people who write them. Why do people ban or try to ban books. 
 Most people ban books with the best intentions; they want to protect others from different ideas and information. Adults often do this because they feel that the book is frightening or has controversial ideas....   [tags: censorship in the US]

Strong Essays
1699 words (4.9 pages)

Banning Books Goes Against The First Amendment Essay

- Banning books goes against the First Amendment, it restricts learning, and it discourages creative and critical thinking. Banned books are books that have been censored by an authority – a government, a library, or a school system. Banning a book means having it removed from our libraries and school systems. They say that books are ban to protect people – mostly children – from the difficult ideas and information that are written in them. It seems to be that most of these ideas are too frightening or controversial for others to have to endure....   [tags: Freedom of speech, Censorship]

Strong Essays
1037 words (3 pages)

The Perpetual Battle Against Censorship Essay

-  "There is more than one way to burn a book," (176) says Ray Bradbury when explaining the reason he wrote Fahrenheit 451. Bradbury at the time was upset about "condensed books", or books which had been simplified for easier reading. Luckily, this fad seems to have passed. However, he was also upset about people who wrote asking him to change the role of women or African-Americans to make them more or less dominant in some of his works. One of the major themes in Fahrenheit 451 was just that; a society where everyone got what they wished and literature was eliminated entirely so it wouldn't offend anyone....   [tags: The Fight Against Censorship 2014]

Strong Essays
3073 words (8.8 pages)

Essay on The Unconstitutionality of Banning Gay Marriage

- ... I don’t know if the anti-gay community knows this but, in the United States we have this thing called the constitution and the constitution clearly protects the rights of liberty, freedom, and equality of all, even those in the gay community. It is clearly unconstitutional to deny an individual a chance of happiness that would not affect society at all because of the color of their skin, religious belief, or sexual preference. Denying same-sex couples of marriage is like denying Christians of going to church, it’s is unethical, demoralizing, and completely unconstitutional....   [tags: happiness, economic, divorce]

Strong Essays
1605 words (4.6 pages)

Banning The Box Is Not Nearly Enough By Lewis M. Steel Essay

- “Banning the Box is Not Nearly Enough” by Lewis M. Steel relates to topics covered in We the People: An Introduction to American Government (Eleventh Edition), more specifically the material examined in chapter three (“Federalism: Forging A Nation”) and chapter four (“Civil Liberties: Protecting Individual Rights”). Not only does the article include subjects that are mentioned in chapters three and four, but it also provides a deeper understanding as to why the issue discussed in the article is so relevant to our country’s politics....   [tags: Federal government of the United States]

Strong Essays
1300 words (3.7 pages)

Essay about Long Walk to Freedom by Nelson Mandela– Book Review

- Long Walk to Freedom by Nelson Mandela– Book Review "…calm, patient determination to reclaim this country as your own, and now the joy that we can loudly proclaim from the rooftops--Free at last. Free at last. ... This is a time to heal the old wounds and build a new South Africa." Nelson Mandela fought his entire life. Nelson Mandela fought a fight for civil rights in South Africa on the streets and behind the prison walls....   [tags: Nelson Mandela Book Review]

Strong Essays
1797 words (5.1 pages)

Why Books Get Banned Essays

- Throughout history, books have majorly impacted the societies in which they were written. Many of the most significant classics in history were challenged or even banned by the people of its time. Great novels, such as The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn by Mark Twain, and The Scarlet Letter by Nathaniel Hawthorne, have been through their fair share of challenges over the years. People of the 1800s had very strict standards that are very different from ours today, and they did not appreciate it when those beliefs were tested....   [tags: Banning Books]

Strong Essays
1548 words (4.4 pages)

The Law Does Not Expressly Permit Suicide Essay

- In the quotation above, “the law does not expressly permit suicide” he speaks of several conditions: just and unjust, accordance with virtue, the state, and habituation. With regards to justice, he illustrates the difference between just and unjust as a condition of following a law that is in accordance with virtue. He makes particular reference to the state and the role of the state where the state prescribes laws that allow us to live in accordance with virtue and the right rule of life. Furthermore, Aristotle viewed suicide not so much as a question of morality, but rather as action of injustice towards the state On habituation, he acknowledges that a person who decides to act unjustly a...   [tags: Ethics, Morality, Virtue, Justice]

Strong Essays
1333 words (3.8 pages)

Flag and Cross Burning as Free Speech Issues

- The first ten amendments to the Constitution better known as The Bill of Rights were developed by the Founding Fathers in order to protect specific rights of the people of that time. The First Amendment protected speech, religion and expression. The First Amendment was most probably protecting scientific discourse, music, literature and the arts of elite white males. In 1791, there was no protection implied or otherwise for women or black slaves. The cross burning of the Ku Klux Klan or flag burning of American citizens was not a consideration of the Founding Fathers....   [tags: Law]

Strong Essays
1097 words (3.1 pages)