There are many people who have lived through and within the Bolshevik Revolution, so there are a multitudinous variety of perspectives, thoughts, and insights about the revolution. The Bolshevik Revolution is known for many things; some say that the revolution helped women become free of control, and others proclaim that it did nothing but continue to hold women captive of their desired rights. The Bolshevik Revolution article states the side of a history professor Richard Stites, who argues yes the revolution benefited the women whilst the other side is declared no the revolution did no justice for women at all, which was argued by a Russian scholar, Lesly A. Rimmel. The opposing arguments both create an effective view on the revolution, and …show more content…
This is especially impressive because while building her stance she seems to leave out any direct bias. This I think truly is a result of a woman writing about women’s issues. Passionate is this easiest word to describe Rimmel’s tone throughout her piece. This is not to say that Richard Stites doesn’t care about women’s rights because the one thing he did make clear in his writing is that he did believe that women deserved their rights whether it came to economic equality or suffrage. Though a clear distinction is made when a person can directly relate to an issue, this applies whether it is an African American speaking on slavery or a football player describing why they think it’s the best sport. Rimmel makes it very apparent as to where her views on feminism stand early in her writing.
After reading into both articles of the volume, I find it fairly easy to reach a conclusion as to whether or not the Bolshevik revolution was beneficial for women. Though I do believe that Lesley Rimmel wrote a strong argument I ideally would love to see a joint effort between both of the authors. A combination of strong factual information that Stites provides in conjunction with the opinionated writing of Rimmel would make for a great article. Or as an alternative, I’d like to see Stites use his same argument and write it with more of the tone the Rimmel took as it would make his case
The Seizure of Power by the Bolsheviks in 1917. How did the Bolsheviks seize power of the Russian Empire in 1917? They were able to do this as a result of taking advantage of the current political and social situations in the country at the time. Through such decisions as disbanding the army and siding with the majority. the peasants, through such promises as land, food, equality and peace.
Gimenez, Martha E. "Capitalism and the Oppression of Women: Marx Revisited." Science & Society 69.1 (2005): 11-32. ProQuest Central. Web. 29 Apr. 2014. .
The Failure of the Provisional Government and the Rise of the Bolsheviks i. Subject of investigation. How did the failure of the Provisional Government allow for the rise of the Bolsheviks? ii. Methods to be used.
The Effect of the Bolshevik Rule on Russian Culture Bolshevik cultural policy was based on spreading their values to the population. They attempted to promote equality to create a classless society. In addition to removing class differences they attempted to give equal status to women and to young people. In order to encourage women to work state funded crèches were established and laws passed to give women parity in terms of pay with men. The state tried to destroy the old concept of families by legalising abortion and enabling people to obtain divorces much more simply.
so a treaty would be a minor set back if Germany lost the war to
that was required to be done was 'to issue a few decrees, then shut up
...found that the book gave perspective to each of the individual classes, rather than covering only the bourgeois or the proletariat. Today you will scarcely find a job or institution were women are not allowed, had I not read this chapter it would have been very difficult for me to understand what women at this time went through.
On March 3, 1918 Russia lost 1/3 of its fertile farm lands, 1/3 of its
Exploring Why the Bolsheviks Were Able to Seize Power in 1917 The Bolsheviks were able to seize power in Oct/Nov 1917 due to a number of reasons, some contributing more than others. At the beginning of the year, they did not seem to have much chance of winning power due to low support and no strong leadership. However throughout the year things went the Bolsheviks way and their fortunes changed dramatically for the better. The Kornilov Revolt helped the Bolsheviks in more than one way.
The Russian Revolution The Russian revolution can be broken up into short and long term causes. In March 1917 the Tsars regime was overthrown and that was the end of Russia’s monarchy, Tsar Nicolas’ inability to see the needs of the Russian people led to his collapse and eventually death. The long term causes can be broken into four main sections. Firstly the Russian middle class had lost all respect for the tsar, they no longer believed that Tsar Nicolas could restore law and order, demonstrations were being held regularly, his only known course of action to take was violence, like the horrific incident of bloody Sunday 1905, in which the tsar’s loyal Cossacks opened fire upon unarmed demonstrators. The Tsar could not see the unbelievably clear needs of his people, industrial development was at low, weapons and vital minerals were in short supply, workers began to strike, the average wage of a worker during 1917 would not have been enough to feed one mouth let alone a family.
Many people wonder why some countries, like Russia, are the way they are today. What most people do not realize is that most of these countries have gone through many changes in government and society. The Russian Revolution was one of the most significant events because of how is changed not only Russia's government, but also the whole country.
Linda Kreber's Women In The Republic: Intellect And Ideology In Revolutionary America was written to focus on the role of women after the revolution. Kreber analyzed the various roles of women in the revolution, and the impact these roles had on women in the republic following. ...
Account For the Success of the Bolsheviks in October 1917 At the beginning of 1917 most of the Bolsheviks were in exile but by the end of 1917 the Bolshevik party had not only consolidated control of Moscow and Petrograd, but they were also advancing on the rest of the country. This success was due to several linked factors; the Bolshevik policy of non-cooperation, weakness of the Provisional Government, division of alternative opposition, Lenin's leadership skills, the power of the Petrograd Soviet and Trotsky as its leader, failure on deliver of land reform and the oppressed, armed workers in Petrograd. Bolshevik success is dictated by whether they met their aims; these included the establishment of a Socialist government over the whole of Russia, which would be ruled by a centralised democracy achieved through a Proletarian Revolution. Lenin returned from exile in 1917, the same year as the Bolshevik success, which immediately implicates him as vital to the Bolshevik victory.
...st and feminist literary theory have one goal, to challenge the power structures in a society. I believe that there is a relationship between the fight for both a classless society and equality among genders is not possible without the other. Inessa Armand the first leader of the women's department of the 1917 Russian Revolution said that: "If women's liberation is unthinkable without communism, then communism is unthinkable without women's liberation." This simply means patriarchy and all its unwanted baggage cannot be eradicated without uprooting obtaining a classless society. Apart from Emeli Sandé using imagery and sweet voice to create a beautiful compilation, she tells us a simple message which when viewed through these two lenses makes this clearer, has showed me the relationship between the two analytical glasses and it definitely remains my favourite text.
The Conditions for Workers and Peasants Under the Bolsheviks and Under the Tsar's Rule Conditions for workers and peasants were deplorable under the rule of the Tsars, but not to the extent they were under the Bolsheviks. Despite the Bolsheviks claiming their policies were entirely in favour of the proletariat, peasants were forced to face horrific famine and a vast decline in living standards under rule by Lenin and the Bolsheviks. When Alexander II came to power in 1855 he realised that in order to modernise Russia and improve the weakening economy he needed to make dramatic reforms. In 1861 Alexander issued his Emancipation Manifesto, proposing 17 legislative acts that would free the serfs in Russia. Even though this new-found freedom in some ways seemed to place a greater burden on the peasants due to heavy redemption payments on their land and little improvement regarding agricultural methods in Russia, the act made the now-freed serfs feel that progress was being made towards a fairer social system in Russia and gave them some hope for more affirmative reforms in the future.