A biological agent can be defined as a microorganism that causes disease in human, plants, and animals; it also could cause deterioration of material. Biological Agents can be broken down into two classes, pathogens and toxins. Out of the two classes pathogens is considered to be the most dangerous because it could be a bacteria or a virus that is capable of being transferred from one person to another. Toxins are poisons which can be just as deadly as pathogens when produced and released under the right weather conditions. Biological agents are quite different from chemical agents, although there are many differences; the main difference is the lethality and the onset of symptoms.
Biological weapons are capable of producing mass casualties due to its high potency, considerable accessibility, easy delivery, and low visibility. They are also very inexpensive and very easy to produce; it can be easily disseminated among the population. In fact something as simple as a crop sprayer which is used on farms to produce crops could be use as a delivery method. Biological agents could be as small as a kilo gram of anthrax which is capable of killing thousands of people. This amoun...
... middle of paper ...
...In addition to that its members were not fully committed to the agreement. Many nations signed the treaty but yet continued their research and development of biological weapons. The current status of the Biological Weapons Convention treaty has been severely degraded. There have been multiple conferences held over the years with no resolution. The United Nations has failed to come up with protocols that all members can agree upon.
Croddy A. (2005). “Weapons of Mass Destruction. An Encyclopedia of Worldwide Policy, Technology and History, (Vol. 1, pp. 43-46. Santa Barbara: Eric A. Croddy.
Danzig R. (1996). “Commentaries” Vol 278, No. 5. Retrieved from
Dire J. (2013). “Biological Warfare Agents” Retrieved from
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- The term weapon of mass destruction has been in existence since the 1930’s. Weapons of mass destruction can be better identified as nuclear weapons, biological weapons, chemical weapons, or radiological weapons. A true definition of weapons of mass destruction is “any destructive device; any weapon that is designed or intended to cause death or serious bodily injury through the release, dissemination, or impact of toxic or poisonous chemicals, or their precursors; any weapon involving a biological agent, toxin, or vector; any weapon that is designed to release radiation or radioactivity at a level dangerous to human life”.... [tags: Chemical Weapons]
1056 words (3 pages)
- Biological & Chemical Weapons Chaos, fear, and death. Those three words are what most people’s first thoughts are when they see the destructive offspring of either Biological or Chemical Weapons. These Weapons of Mass Destruction (also known as WMD’s) are actually considered the deadliest weapons of all time to not only humans but also to other animals, and plants. Biological and Chemical Warfare has become a major threat not only to the safety to the people of America, but also on the frontlines across the world but, that in order to fix these that the Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention and Chemical Weapons Convention could do is to make mandatory background checks for anyone who buy... [tags: fear, destruction, chaos]
1197 words (3.4 pages)
- Has the international law been able to tame the manufacture and use of BW. In the face of ever increasing terror attacks, autocratic regimes lead by crazy men (Syria as an example), the control of BW has to be successful. In 1972 the use of BWs was outlawed by 165 states, however several nations still research on the same for defense purposes. The argument here is that defense can be interpreted differently by different states; as a good defense is a good offense. Nothing can stop South and North Korea from attacking each other in the name of defense with the BWs, which would have a cause effect the world over.... [tags: BWs, small pox, syria, law]
1500 words (4.3 pages)
Explaining Why Biological Warfare Cannot be Explained with the SCOT Theory, Actor-Network Theory and Technological Systems Theory
- The purpose of this essay is to explain why it will be a problem to explain biological warfare with the SCOT theory, actor-network theory and technological systems theory. Social Construction of Technology (SCOT) is a theory that was introduced by Weiber Bijker that explains the link between social and technical processes of a technology or artifact. Bjiker argued that technology is shaped by human engineers, market forces, consumer’s needs and demands. In SCOT, technology is a social construction.... [tags: biological warfare]
619 words (1.8 pages)
- Society today has been the witness to the use of chemical weapons upon various groups of people. A prime example is the use of poison gas in Syria.( http://fair.org/take-action/action-alerts/iraq-then-syria-now) Chemical weapons were made by chemist to do great harm. Typically, a chemical weapon is defined by chemist as any toxic chemical or its precursor that can cause death, injury, temporary incapacitation or sensory irritation through its chemical action. Because of the destruction caused by the use of chemical weapons, society has tried to place controls on their use with the development.... [tags: weapons of mass destruction]
1249 words (3.6 pages)
- Exploration of Biological Weapons We have all heard about biological weapons but I have never been really sure about what it exactly is, when and how it is usedâ€¦ So in this essay I am going to mix the science and the impact on society to find the answers to all my doubts. Biological weapons may be defined as "micro organisms that infect and grow in the target host producing a clinical disease that kills or incapacitates the targeted host". These microbes can be natural or made by genetic engineering.... [tags: Papers]
903 words (2.6 pages)
- The Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) set out a model of the Nuclear Weapons Convention (NWC) in 1997. The model underwent revision and reforms in 2007. The text puts a proposal that international law completely eliminates and bans the use of nuclear weapons. The proposal has general support from the international system. Over the years, security at the international level has faced opposition when it comes to the disarmament of nuclear weapons. Discussions that are concerned with the risks of nuclear weapons and the options for disarmament have been featured in several international law conferences with the increase in the back up for a world free of nuclear weapons.... [tags: arms race, abolition, peace]
1556 words (4.4 pages)
- Nuclear weapons continue to present a real threat to humanity and other life on Earth. Scholars of international relations and policymakers share in the belief that the sheer power and destructiveness of nuclear weapons prevent them from being used by friends and foes alike. Then the real question becomes; what is the need for nuclear weapons. Nuclear weapons are defined as, volatile device that originates its destructive force from nuclear reactions, either fission or a combination of fission and fusion.... [tags: international relations, danger of atomic war]
836 words (2.4 pages)
- ... Despite the majority of Indonesians and urging of the United States, Indonesia will not change its position on nuclear disarmament, non-proliferation, and peaceful uses of nuclear technoogy (Lieggi). Actions taken by your government with regard to the issue In 1970, Indonesia signed the Treaty on the Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT), and in 1996, acceded to the Additional Protocol. This treaty is about nuclear disarmament, nonproliferation, and peaceful uses of nuclear technoogy. In 1996, Indonesia signed the Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty (CTBT), which was ratified in Feb.... [tags: United Nations, United States, England, Russia]
1042 words (3 pages)
- The Antarctic Treaty When and why was the treaty formed. The Antarctic Treaty was signed in Washington on the 1st December 1959 by the twelve countries that had been active in Antarctica during the International Geophysical Year (IGY): Argentina, Australia, Belgium, Chile, France, Japan, New Zealand, Norway, South Africa, the United Kingdom, the United States and the USSR. Through this agreement, the countries active in Antarctica consult on the uses of a whole continent, with a commitment that it should not become the scene or object of international discord.... [tags: Papers]
1563 words (4.5 pages)