Comparison Of Mahandas Karam Chandra Ghandi And Adolf Hitler

1469 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Factors affecting leadership style

Mahandas Karam Chandra Ghandi and Adolf Hitler, were both men who changed history through strong character; their outlook on humanity, very different. While one fought against the British, the other fought against forces he was sure would ruin his people. Both men inspired people to become followers through their hypnotic speeches in short amounts of time. While similarities were certainly present in these powerful leaders, their means to attain their goals, were quite opposite; one led by love and nonviolence, the other, guided by hatred and the use of force. Adolf Hitler rose to power after World War I, forcing Germany to pay steep reparations, leaving the country without a military and with inflation. The Nazi party was the …show more content…

He captivated crowds with powerful speeches filled with a sense of purpose for a nation and rallied an entire nation behind him. He utilized constant propaganda to rally support and serve his cause. Confidence was present and people were drawn to aid in his cause just be the sense of purpose he displayed. Hitler once said, “I do not see why man should not be as cruel as nature” and to this quote, he lived true, carrying out horrific acts against the Jews, ending the lives of millions, all with the backing of his followers. The brief synopsis, here written, offers a glimpse into Hitler’s reign, yet clearly defines his personality, which greatly differs from Mahandas Karam Chandra …show more content…

While Ghandi was able to accomplish goals and influence people through passive means, Hitler utilized harsh tactics and control. One fought ultimately for the betterment of people, while the other sought to accomplish his own political and social visions. When studying these two individuals, it is difficult to fathom how they could both be named as “Man of the Year,” however, it is clear that both were successful in many of their pursuits and both, without a doubt, influenced vast numbers of people. Either leader could influence leaders of the future, for their successes were evident and therefor, could be influential for one to decide to pursue their own agenda through Gahndi’s peaceful boycotts or through the radical, deathly ways propelled by Adolf

Show More
Related

  • The Leadership Roles of Adolf Hitler and Benito Mussolini

    578 Words  | 2 Pages

    Hitler was furious with Germany’s surrender in World War I, so when he got back to his home in Munich, he was determined to enter politics and become the greatest leader in German history (Smith). He spent all of his time and effort trying to become the chancellor of Germany. Once he was voted into being chancellor, he needed a way to become the leader of all of Germany. Hitler gathered power through many acts of t...

    Read More

  • Aldof Hitler's Persuasive Speech Research Paper

    321 Words  | 1 Pages

    The conditions in Germany when Hitler came into power were that the Wiemar Republic was weak, they had a democracy and after president Heindenburg died the democracy was even weaker. There was hardly any money, before the Great Depression began. Aldof Hitler promised a better life for everyone in Germany, and with his persuasive speech managed to get what he wanted, power. The treaty of Versailles blamed Germany for the First World War. The Weimar politicians did not seem to have an end to the ongoing crisis so they gave Hitler a spot in politics, his speech soon enough brought him up the hierarchy and lead to his success. The support for the Nazi party was rising every day before the Communists, the Great Depression did much of Hitler’s

    Read More

  • A Comparison of Hitler and Stalin

    775 Words  | 2 Pages

    ...Stalin's case, Hitler was able to then, by way of great manipulation on Hindenburgs part, to pass the enabling act, which in turn was a key element in his final success in becoming Dictator. Therefore, after both leaders got far enough up the political hierarchy, they were both able to very skilfully reach their goals of becoming dictators in their own right by precision planning and great knowledge of their political systems.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Mao Maandi And Gandhi

    1445 Words  | 3 Pages

    Mao ZeDong and Gandhi have influenced our political views and aspects on how we view our society and country today. Both used their power differently and succeeded and failed but are looked up to incorporate their theories and philosophies in our decision-makings. Noticing the experiences they encountered are the main reasons for their beliefs, which led their paths to either using violence, or non-violent acts.

    Read More

  • Adolf Hitler's Oppression of the German people

    1704 Words  | 4 Pages

    Centuries later and the name Adolf Hitler still rings volumes till this present day: discussed in history books, talked about amongst intellects and commoners alike, and despised by many for years to come. Upon hearing his name many may think of all the negative things Hitler has done, but few fail to analyze just how one man created such controversy amongst a nation without being stopped. The question then lies how does a man reign over country and devastate it for years to come? Adolf Hitler, a man who excelled in persuasion and charisma was able to reign over Germany for years. Born in Austria April 20th 1889, Hitler grew up with many hardships in his life.

    Read More

  • The Holocaust: The Cause And Effects Of The Holocaust

    1250 Words  | 3 Pages

    After the terrible causes of World War I, Germany was stuck in the ruins. They were still trying to rebuild and recover from the war. The Treaty of Versailles, along with the Great Depression severely affected Germany. The unemployment lines increased, and food was scarce. Money was a huge hassle too, the factories were all closed and the savings were completely wiped out. Due to all these economic is what made Hitler’s rise to p...

    Read More

  • Hitler's Utopia

    1023 Words  | 3 Pages

    Adolf Hitler came to power on February 28, 1933 (Rossel). He rose to power using inflammatory speeches and inspiring hope for the defeated Germans. He constructed a system to empower the German people and allow them to thrive in the period after the Great Depression (Noakes). Using keen acumen and decisive moves, he was able to turn Germany into a war machine bent on the creation of an Aryan utopian society, at the cost of all inferior races, especially the Jews ("The Period between 1933 and 1939"). At this time Germany was a defeated country. They had recently had numerous humiliating defeats in WWI, and the Germans no longer had the pride they once had celebrated (Laurita). Augmented by the fact that the Great Depression had ravaged the country and left many in a state of penury and impoverished, the Germans were desperate. As well, Germany was currently a country without any source of stability without a generally supported constitution. When Hitler promised a utopian society filled with hope and where the Germans would be exalted as the superior race, the Germans listened and obeyed his every word (Noakes). Hitler fed on the desperation and hopelessness of these German people to make a society driven by fear; this state of pity allowed Hitler to convince the Germans that he could provide a better future.

    Read More

  • Hitler's Persuasion

    673 Words  | 2 Pages

    Adolf Hitler, a very-well respected man who dreamed of conquering the whole world to revenge for all the shame Germany got after World War I and building a ‘Greater Germany’. So, he became the leader of about 90 million people; the Nazi regime. So, how did he earn that much of power to be so authoritative? He knew how to approach people’s heart with his persuasive orations. Furthermore, he knew the good of his people and he knew where to put those people. Plus, he set his goal and he achieved it; for his country. Even though his idea to start the war was very foolish, but looking at how he led his own people, Hitler was an eminently successful leader.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Fdr And Stalin

    612 Words  | 2 Pages

    Adolf Hitler was the leader of the Nazi party, Chancellor of Germany, and leader of Nazi Germany. Hitler was one of the most powerful and notorious dictators of the 20th century. Him invading Poland was one of the main causes of World War two. Eventually Germany was finally defeated in WWII, leaving them financially devastated, and politically unstable.

    Read More

  • How Did Felix Albrecht Use Propaganda In Save The German Family

    837 Words  | 2 Pages

    Adolf Hitler was considered a performer, a performer who appealed to all audiences. His speeches, although very dramatic, captured the people of Germany to view Hitler as a celebrity. German society looked up to Hitler and the Nazi party as their saviors. Hitler’s speeches were also uplifting, he promised a better Germany for its people who were in anguish. Hitler and the Nazi party’s uniformed appearance made their supporters feel a sense of order that could whip the country into

    Read More

  • Comparation of Gandhi to Socrates, to buddha, to Jesus and to St. Fancis of Assisi

    940 Words  | 2 Pages

    Throughout history most national heroes have been warriors, but Gandhi was a passive and peaceful preacher of morals, ethics, and beliefs. He was an outsider who ended British rule over India without striking a blow. Moreover, Gandhi was not skillful with any unusual artistic, scholarly, or scientific talents. He never earned a degree or received any special academic honors. He was never a candidate in an election or a member of government. Yet when he died, in 1948, practically the whole world mourned him. Einstein said in his tribute, “Gandhi demonstrated that a powerful human following can be assembled not only through the cunning game of the usual political maneuvers and trickery but through the cogent example of a morally superior conduct of life”. Other tributes compared Gandhi to Socrates, to Buddha, to Jesus, and to Saint Fancis of Assisi.

    Read More

  • Who Should Be Blamed for the Holocaust?

    756 Words  | 2 Pages

    Hitler had a lot to do with Germany and he was remembered but not because of anything positive, but because he was one of the worst coldhearted dictators Germany or the world could’ve experienced. My view and Topic is worth consideration by the reader because it will inform them more about Hitler’s actions in 1933 and so on.

    Read More

  • Rise Of Hitler Essay

    1492 Words  | 3 Pages

    In 1920 Germany’s economy began to fail. After WWI, Germany was being blamed for everything that went wrong in the war. The Treaty of Versailles stated that Germany’s army was restricted to 100,000 men, they were to pay 132 billion in damages from the war, and they could have no air force. Germany was in a depression. Hitler became the hero; he promised the German people financial stability and his promise came true. Germany was finally out of their depression and working great, thanks to Adolf Hitler. Hitler was loved by many, he had saved Germany, and he was greatly admired by Germans nationwide. However, many events lead up to him becoming a villain, and basically ruining the world in the 1930’s.

    Read More

  • Abuse of Power

    943 Words  | 2 Pages

    Adolf Hitler is known to be one of the “greatest” leaders in history who had abused his powers and had shattered his country apart. Born in 1889 in Austria, Hitler abused his powers because of his greedy ego and because of his narcissism. It all became with Hitler organizing a party called the National Socialist, most popularly know as the Nazi Party. The rise of the Nazi Party was the thing that led to the start of Hitler’s rein and his abuse of power. The Nazi Party eventually led Adolf Hitler to come to rule and had given Hitler the chance to take control the entire nation.

    Read More

  • The Rise of the Nazi Party

    1075 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Rise of the Nazi Party Hitler’s rise to power was the result of many factors, but Hitler’s ability to take advantage of Germany’s poor leadership and economic and political conditions was the most significant factor. His ability to manipulate the media and the German public whilst taking advantage of Germany’s poor leadership resulted in both the collapse of the Weimar Republic and the rise of Hitler and the Nazi party. During the early 1920s, Germany was struggling with economic instability and political uncertainty. Germany, after being defeated in the Great War, was forced to sign the unforgiving treaty of Versailles, which the Weimar Republic was held responsible for. This brought forward feelings of fear, anger and insecurity towards the Weimar Republic.

    Read More

More about Comparison Of Mahandas Karam Chandra Ghandi And Adolf Hitler

Open Document