In the December of 1965, three students wore black armbands to school in silent protest of the Vietnam War that was taking place at the same time. Chris Eckhardt, along with John and Mary Beth Tinker, were suspended from school for wearing the armbands that supposedly disturbed their classmates and prevented them from focusing on their schoolwork (Oyez). The students, along with their parents, sued the Des Moines Independent school district for having their rights under the First Adamant disregarded. The District Court dismissed the case, but the Supreme Court took it upon themselves to handle the court case instead. In a ruling of 7-2, the Supreme Court sided with the Tinkers and the Eckhardts (Legal Information Institute). In the Court’s opinion, they agreed that, “...There is no indication that the work of the schools or any class was disrupted. Outside the classrooms, a few students made hostile remarks to the children wearing armbands, but there were no threats or acts ...
... middle of paper ...
...case for every students in all schools.
In conclusion, there are many challenges for U.S. students when it comes to expressing their opinions, being able to do what they want, or meeting their personal needs in the education system. The First Adamant should be able to protect the students’ rights of speaking on what is on their minds, but society has changed so much over the years, it is hard to say what beliefs are still protected under it. The Tinker vs. Des Moines case, Anthem, and the Wisconsin bill might have different issues in them, but they all share the common issue of students being unable to have their voices heard the first they tried to speak up. Socially, things have changed so the beliefs and opinions of students is heard more over the years, but it will still take time for the educational system to change before it is easier for students to speak up.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- ... Madison saw this as a way to counteract factions by not getting rid of them, but instead having factions cancel each other out by majority vote. This is due to the fact that if you have a lot of factions that have different on a given topic then no matter how big or small the faction is each will get equal representation and in theory the majority vote would show what the nation as a whole wants not just what one large overruling faction wants. Madison knew that a republic would not be full proof though.... [tags: power and oppression, government]
1007 words (2.9 pages)
- The Bill of Rights, or the first ten amendments of the constitution, were designed to protect individuals’ rights and liberties from the central government, when the United States’ Constitution was being written and put in place. Led by Patrick Henry, Antifederalists were against the idea of changing to a constitution, but were the main supporters of the Bill of Rights. Their opposition, led by James Madison, however felt this Bill of Rights was unnecessary for the national government to do. Politics back then was quite similar to today, at least in the sense of what was being supported, one party was considered to support the common man, while the other supported the rich, but also one supp... [tags: constitution, madison, federalists]
1432 words (4.1 pages)
- ... He preferred a national government with a strong central body, which left less power for the States. Madison thought that the States should have less power because he was worried about other’s actions. In his Federalist No. 10, Madison expresses his concern about factions corrupting the government’s actions. “These must be chiefly, if not wholly, effects of the unsteadiness and injustice with which a factious spirit has tainted our public demonstrations.” Madison also says that democracies that are comprised of a smaller number of citizens are more susceptible to become corrupt because of their citizens.... [tags: Bill of Rights, influential persons in government]
697 words (2 pages)
- The second amendment, originally proposed by James Madison as part of the Bill of Rights, was ratified on December 15, 1791 and clearly states, “A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” Many people who are ignorant about the true meaning of the second amendment will tell you that it is all about hunting. Though I can tell you after taking many government and US history classes that the meaning of the second amendment means far more than the right to hunt.... [tags: United States Constitution]
1001 words (2.9 pages)
- The Bill of Rights is a list of limitations on the power of the government. Firstly, the Bill of Rights is successful in assuring the adoption of the Constitution. Secondly, the Bill of Rights did not address every foreseeable situation. Thirdly, the Bill of Rights has assured the safety of the people of the nation. Successes, failures, and consequences are what made the Bill of Rights what they are today. Firstly, the Bill of Rights has guaranteed the adoption of the Constitution. James Madison proposed the Bill of Rights to the First Federal Congress on June 8, 1789 (Primary Documents 1).... [tags: American Government, Politics]
1380 words (3.9 pages)
- ... It has become a common practice for the online media to make live broadcasts of the Stakeholders Congresses. The role of The Bill of Rights in supervision is giving full play. The Bill of Rights has actively created conditions for civilian to supervise the government, and attaches great importance to the role of the poor group in supervision. Civilians at all levels are required to investigate and resolve in a timely manner all problems reported to the government by civilian via the The Bill of Rights, and to inform civilian of the results.... [tags: US constitution, government]
1433 words (4.1 pages)
- The “Bill of rights” had been proposed as a follow up to Parliament’s original Habeas Corpus bill, which safeguarded personal freedom and liberty. Now just about every colony had a bill of rights, so James Madison suggested that if the United States was to survived as a a country it would need to have a set of rules versus thirtheen and every state would have the same rules. In 1789, James Madison proposed a series of legislative articles to the first United States congress, but the processes took a while; Madison proposed twelve but only ten became known as the “Bill of Rights” in December 15, 1791.... [tags: U.S. History ]
1663 words (4.8 pages)
- The Bill of Rights as it stands for the United States entered as a stems from a vow as promises so to speak was made by the Fathers of Confederation to the states during the effort for ratification of the Constitution in 1787-1788. Numerous states had created some conditions for their ratification; the appendage of amendments, which would assure citizen’s a safeguard like a safety net for their human rights in contrast to the central government and therefore the people had a rather remarkable circumstances in which the entrenchment of a bill of rights in the American Constitution was prepared by means of the fundamental command of the states, they themselves being alarmed about the centr... [tags: US Constitution, The Amendments]
2839 words (8.1 pages)
- After the Constitution was written, the new born nation was immediately split into two political sides, the federalists and the anti-federalists, over the ratification. Federalists, southern planters or people that tended to hold interest in trade, advocated a strong executive. On the other hand, anti-federalists, back country people or people involved in business but not in the mercantile economy, opposed the ratification of the constitution. The two sides, after much debate, were able to come to a compromise after the Bill of Rights was included into the Constitution.... [tags: The Bill of Rights Essays]
768 words (2.2 pages)
- The Bill of Rights After the Revolution, the States adopted their own constitutions, many of which contained a Bill of Rights. The Americans still faced the challenge of creating a central government for their new nation. In 1777 the Continental Congress adopted the Articles of Confederation, which were ratified in 1781. Under the Articles, the states retained their “sovereignty, freedom and independence,” while the national government was kept weak and inferior. Over the next few years it became evident that the system of government that had been chosen was not strong enough to completely settle and defend the frontier, regulating trade, currency and commerce, and organizing thirteen sta... [tags: Politics Political Civics]
1279 words (3.7 pages)