Both cases Schenck v. United States, and Korematsu v. United States, demonstrated instances where the “parchment barriers”, as Madison predicted, proved their uselessness to preventing the abuse of authority in the fact that they were least effective when most needed, ...
... middle of paper ...
...at these “parchment barriers” did nothing to protect the rights of individuals in these situations.
Just as James Madison predicted, the Bill of Rights, while necessary in highlighting the rights the people should enjoy, often proved ineffective as they were “parchment barriers” to the abuse of authority. These “parchment barriers” provided no protection to individuals as governments overshadowed their rights under certain circumstances, like in times of war, and deciding arbitrarily, especially for many of the cases involving the rights of students. In all of these cases, individuals’ liberties were overshadowed and curtailed by the government based on the situations, bringing to light the fact that people’s liberties could often be violated by the government, proving true to Madison’s belief that “parchment barriers” served ineffective to the abuse of authority.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- After winning the Revolutionary War and sovereign control of their home country from the British, Americans now had to deal with a new authoritative issue: who was to rule at home. In the wake of this massive authoritative usurpation, there were two primary views of how the new American government should function. Whereas part of the nation believed that a strong, central government would be the most beneficial for the preservation of the Union, others saw a Confederation of sovereign state governments as an option more supportive of the liberties American’s fought so hard for in the Revolution.... [tags: Federalist & Antifederalist Positions]
2017 words (5.8 pages)
- In Federalist no. 78 Hamilton explains the powers and duties of the judiciary department as developed in Article III of the Constitution. Article III of the Constitution is very vague on the structure of the federal courts. Hamilton had to convince Americans that the federal courts would not run amok. He presented that the federal courts would not have unlimited power but that they would play a vital role in the constitutional government. Hamilton limited judiciary power by defining it as a text-bound interpretative power.... [tags: Alexander Hamilton, Federalist no. 78, USA, histor]
1100 words (3.1 pages)
The Progression From The Articles of Confederation to The Constitution As a Result of Anti-Federalist, and Federalist Debate
- Looking back in history (1781-1787) at the debate over ratification of the Constitution we can see that the making of the constitution was a long drawn out battle between the federalists and the Anti-Federalists. There were concerns as to the inherent weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation, such as the lack of action during Shay’s Rebellion, the issue over taxation, as well as the problematic consensus required by all states to change any one of the Articles. There was a fear that if given too much power the executive leader would become like the king they had just fought a revolution to free themselves from.... [tags: American Constitution]
3731 words (10.7 pages)
- James Madison writes in Federalist No. 51, “[i]n framing a government which is to be administered by men over men, the great difficulty lies in this: you must first enable the government to control the governed; and in the next place oblige it to control itself.” He goes on to explain his concept of “compound republic” in which two distinct governments (national and state) are further subdivided into separate departments. In each of the two distinct governments, the legislative, executive and judicial branches (departments) work like a scale to balance each other and prevent one from gaining too much power or influence.... [tags: Democracy, Government, Federalist Papers]
973 words (2.8 pages)
- Aristotle's Legacy in the Federalist Papers While the government of the United States owes its existence to the contents and careful thought behind the Constitution, some attention must be given to the contributions of a series of essays called the Federalist Papers towards this same institution. Espousing the virtues of equal representation, these documents also promote the ideals of competent representation for the populace and were instrumental in addressing opposition to the ratification of the Constitution during the fledgling years of the United States.... [tags: Federalist Papers Essays]
2064 words (5.9 pages)
- In creating the Constitution, the states had several different reactions, including a rather defensive reaction, but also an understanding reaction. As a document that provided the laws of the land and the rights of its people. It directs its attention to the many problems in this country; it offered quite a challenge because the document lent itself to several views and interpretations, depending upon the individual reading it. It is clear that the founders’ perspectives as white, wealthy or elite class, American citizens would play a role in the creation and implementation of The Constitution.... [tags: The Constitution]
1073 words (3.1 pages)
- In 1789 the United states created the Bill of Rights to the Constitution after they gained independence from the British. Then in 1791 They added the amendments to the Constitution. There are many similarities to the Bill of Rights and the amendments in the Constitution but many people have a misconception that they are the same. There are some differences between the two and let’s see what are the difference in the two. The Bill of Rights the first ten amendments to the US Constitution, ratified in 1791 and guaranteeing such rights as the freedoms of speech, assembly, and worship.... [tags: United States Constitution]
1026 words (2.9 pages)
- The Anti-Federalist Papers documented the political background in which the Constitution was born. The Anti-Federalist saw threats to rights and authorizations in the Constitution. The Anti-Federalists thought that the Constitution created too strong a central government. A central government is the political authority that governs the entire nation. They felt that the Constitution did not create a Federal government, but a single national government. The Anti-Federalist proposed a “Bill of Rights”, to make sure the citizens were protected by the law.... [tags: United States Constitution]
1505 words (4.3 pages)
- United States Constitution The United States Constitution, although the classic American declaration of US law, is actually a compilation of thoughts, ideas, and political ideology adopted from Europe. In the summer of 1787, fifty-five delegates representing twelve of the thirteen states met in Philadelphia to fix the national government. The previous Articles of Confederation were too weak and did not adequately unify the states/colonies into one political entity. The challenge was to create a strong central government without letting any one person, or group of people, get too much power.... [tags: Separation of powers, United States Constitution]
1191 words (3.4 pages)
- After winning their independence in the American Revolution, America's leaders were hesitant to create a strong centralized government in fear that it would only replace King George III's tyranny. As a result, the first constitution, the Articles of Confederation, gave the national government hardly any power over the states, and created chaos within the nation. Because of the Articles' inefficiency, a new document called the Constitution was drafted. The Constitution created a more centralized government with the separation of powers among executive, legislative, and judicial branches.... [tags: Political Science Politics]
1448 words (4.1 pages)