If the hospital case were examined through a purely deontological perspective, then only the action itself and the intent behind the action can be considered. The outcomes and consequences of the actions will hav...
... middle of paper ...
...ked to decide between [moral obligation] when their demands are incompatible” (Marino 248) since it would simply measure which obligation provides the greatest happiness. Additionally, there are no other considerations that would change the morality of the action using deontology because the action inherently violates human autonomy and duties, which make up the core of deontology. The only plausible way to change the morality would be to have the patients willingly give up their autonomy and allow the hospital to commence the treatments because this would prevent the hospital from breaking the categorical imperatives. In conclusion, regardless of these weakness and the hypothetical considerations, the action would ultimately be considered immoral by both of the categorical imperatives, and, thus, the hospital should not proceed with the potential cancer treatments.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- Current utilitarianism was created by mixing Jeremy Bentham’s account for utilitarianism and John Stuart Mill’s account for utilitarianism. Jeremy Bentham’s account for utilitarianism focused on pleasure. He defined utilitarianism by recognizing the fundamental role of pain and pleasure, approving or disproving the actions based on the amount of pain or pleasure brought on by the consequences, equating good with pleasure and evil with pain, and in return measuring whether pleasure exceeded pain.... [tags: moral theories]
1657 words (4.7 pages)
- In contrast to utilitarianism, deontology uses an action and the intent behind the action to determine the morality of the action rather than the outcomes of the actions. Deontology argues that reason forms the basis of right and wrong. Therefore, using reason, Kant asserts that there are two types of obligations. These two types of obligations are hypothetical imperatives and categorical imperatives. Hypothetical imperatives essentially give instructions based on a person’s individual preference and vary for each situation, Categorical imperatives, unlike hypothetical imperatives, give commands/instructions that are to be applied regardless of personal preferences.... [tags: Immanuel Kant, Categorical imperative, Ethics]
798 words (2.3 pages)
- Answer (A) According to the book Shafer Landau an act utilitarianism is “the version of act consequentialism that says that only well-being is intrinsically valuable, and so says that an act is morally right just because it maximizes overall well-being” (Shafer Landau, G1). In the other words, it means that the act that produces the maximum of the happiness at that time than any other act. Another similar example of this act for the better understanding is, if I have a friend and being with her gives me the most happiness than being with any other friends at that time, but it does not give the same happiness to her and I am unaware about it at that time then it’s also defines as an act... [tags: Utilitarianism, Ethics, Consequentialism]
906 words (2.6 pages)
- It’s only second nature to ask oneself, “What is the right thing to do?” simply for the reason that it is the foundation to making a moral decision. As a society we have to make these decisions because they are vital to living in an indefectible world. I will attest that classical utilitarianism is the most logical moral theory for the sake of the greater good being the only intrinsically valuable thing because it supplies us with the most opportunities to improve welfare. Classical utilitarianism belongs to the family of moral theories called consequentialism.... [tags: Utilitarianism, Morality, Ethics, Consequentialism]
959 words (2.7 pages)
- Consequentialism is an ethical theory that evaluates the consequences of a person’s action to determine if their actions are right or wrong (Slote 34). According to the theory, a morally right act is one that has more good outcomes than bad ones. In this ethical theory, the end justifies the means; hence, it argues that people should first determine the good and bad consequences of actions before they do them. After determining the total outcomes, it is important to investigate whether the total good consequences are more.... [tags: Utilitarianism, Ethics, Consequentialism]
833 words (2.4 pages)
- When reviewing the difficult decision with my Company Officer, he discussed the pressures of passing command inspections, maintaining a professional relationship with your Chief, and preserving personal integrity. Firstly, he noted that ultimate goal of command inspections is to prove the operational readiness of the ship. The inspection will expose any failing parts of the ship and improve operational efficiency once they are fixed. Failing the inspection itself will have negative consequences, but those pale in comparison to punishments for being caught falsely signing the records, or “gundecking”.... [tags: Ethics, Utilitarianism, Virtue, Consequentialism]
1698 words (4.9 pages)
- LEB 323 Ethics Assignment 1. Identify the dilemma you are discussing and describe the choices the decision maker is facing. In this paper I will be discussing the Club Fundraising Case. Kalaya, the decision maker, is facing an ethical dilemma as to whether or not she should continue asking people for donations to her club. Kalaya’s organization has recently enacted a rule that she believes to be a violation of her freedom of expression. Outraged, several club members created a petition in the hopes that the rule would be revoked.... [tags: Ethics, Utilitarianism, Consequentialism, Duty]
1302 words (3.7 pages)
- Is rule-utilitarianism preferable to act-utilitarianism. Classical utilitarianism is a normative ethical theory which holds that an action can only be considered as morally right where its consequences bring about the greatest amount of good to the greatest number (where 'good' is equal to pleasure minus pain). Likewise, an action is morally wrong where it fails to maximise good. Since it was first articulated in the late 19th Century by the likes of Jeremy Bentham and later John Stewart Mill, the classical approach to utilitarianism has since become the basis for many other consequentialist theories such as rule-utilitarianism and act-utilitarianism upon which this essay will focus (Driver,... [tags: killing,ethical theory, consequentialism]
1769 words (5.1 pages)
- Introduction Utilitarianism is a school of thought from consequentialism. Consequentialists believe that we must guide our actions by the consequences that follow them. Utilitarian’s specifically believe that we should maximize happiness, and we ought to implement the actions that bring the most happiness overall. I will consider two cases from a utilitarian’s perspective, and then give reasons why this would not be a good theory to undertake. Our first main issue is conflicts with impartiality; a utilitarian is required to be impartial in order to produce greatest amount of happiness.... [tags: Consequentialism, School of Thought]
1189 words (3.4 pages)
- Consequentialism and non-consequentialism are both action based ethical frameworks that people can use to make ethical judgments. Consequentialism is based on examining the consequences of one’s actions as opposed to non-consequentialism which is focused on whether the act is right or wrong regardless of the outcome (Burgh, Field & Freakley, 2006). The three sub-categories of consequentialism are altruism, utilitarianism and egoism. Altruism is when the actions of a person promote the best consequences for others, yet do not benefit the person who performed the act.... [tags: Ethics]
1564 words (4.5 pages)