Compare And Contrast Beowulf And Gilgamesh

1222 Words3 Pages

Christopher McNutt Dr. Cantrell EN 207.002 12 November 2014 Beowulf vs. Gilgamesh: A Comparison of Equally Epic Proportions When modern readers think of the term “epic hero”, names such as Superman, Batman, and even real life figures such as LeBron James, AJ McCarron, and countless others instantly come into play. All of them have many similarities; they are all “larger-than-life” heroes who display many epic characteristics such as bravery, might, and supreme confidence. However, each is unique in his/her own way. Diving into the world of ancient literature, and one can find many more great heroes that define the term and provide countless entertaining stories of their journeys and battles throughout the primordial word. Beowulf from the …show more content…

A major example focuses around the subplot of the hunting and killing of Humbaba. In Gilgamesh’s quote to Enkidu after he objects to the idea of traveling to the cedar forest (110), Gilgamesh claims: “If I fall on the way, I’ll establish my name: ‘Gilgamesh, who joined battle with fierce Humbaba’ they’ll say” (111). Later on the same page when Gilgamesh is addressing the elders, his speech shows just how much hubris he exerts: “…I will hunt him down in the forest of cedars. I will make the land hear how mighty is the scion of Uruk. I will set my hand to cutting a cedar, an eternal name I will make for myself!” (111-112). Like Beowulf, Gilgamesh’s end goal is shown to be the same. Both want to showcase their strength and might while also making a name for themselves. Utilizing large amounts of hubris through their speeches is the way they do this, followed by an epic battle in which they come out …show more content…

His selflessness is shown on full display after Hygelac’s death, where “…Hygd offered him throne and authority as lord of the ring-hoard…” (165). Instead of accepting the offer, Beowulf refuses under the notion that he couldn’t “…be elevated over Heardred as his lord or to undertake the office of kingship…” (165). It is not until Heardred is killed that he finally agrees to ascend to the throne (166). Beowulf’s actions and initial refusal to take the throne shows that he cares more about the wellbeing of others and the order of succession than assuming power; a sure sign of selflessness. Later on during the final moments of his life, a weak and perishing Beowulf addresses Wiglaf one last time, telling him “…I give thanks that I behold this treasure here in front of me, that I have been allowed to leave my people so well endowed on the day I die. Now that I have bartered my last breath to own this fortune, it is up to you to look after their needs…” (174). Once again, Beowulf’s selflessness prevails. Even in his dying state, one of his top priorities was to make sure all his people would be taken care of and live happily. Neither can be said of Gilgamesh, who represents quite the contrast. Both Beowulf and Gilgamesh make for great representatives of the term “epic hero” by showing near legendary levels of greatness, might, and strength. However, their differences are significant enough that one can clearly

Open Document