Some people oppose utilitarianism, but there are two different ways of being against it. One can be either completely opposed to utilitarianism or partially opposed to it. “A principle may be different from that of utility in two ways: 1. By being constantly opposed to it: this is the case with a principle which may be termed the principle of asceticism. 2. By being sometimes opposed to it, and sometimes not, as it may happen: this is the case with another, which may be termed the principle of sympathy and antipathy” (Bentham). Asceticism can approve of any action that causes unhappiness and can disapprove of any action that causes happiness (Bentham). Sympathy and antipathy are the occasional support and the occasional opposition, respectively, for utilitarianism. The concept of sympathy and antipathy only refer to those who create moral arguments without the need for ev...
... middle of paper ...
...sures. “Now it is an unquestionable fact that those who are equally acquainted with, and equally capable of appreciating and enjoying, both, do give a most marked preference to the manner of existence which employs their higher faculties” (Mill). These people would never choose a lower valued pleasure in order to maintain their dignity.
Mill’s version of utilitarianism is preferable to Bentham’s version. Bentham’s version focuses on the individual, and each individual event must be evaluated for pleasures and pains. This version of utilitarianism also does not take into account the decisions that one makes on others. On the other hand, Mill’s version modified Bentham’s version and focuses on the effects of one’s decisions on other people. This version states that individuals should follow the laws that have been created to bring about the overall good for everybody.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- Utilitarianism is one of the most commonly used ethical theories from the time it was formulated by Jeremy Bentham and John Stewart Mill in the nineteenth century. In his work, Utilitarianism, Bentham “sought to dispel misconceptions that morality has nothing to do with usefulness or utility or that morality is opposed to pleasure” (MacKinnon, 2012, p. 53). To simplify the utilitarian principle, which is one of utility, one can surmise that morality is equated with the greatest amount of utility or good for the greatest number of people (MacKinnon, 2012).... [tags: Utilitarianism, Ethics, Hedonism, Jeremy Bentham]
1022 words (2.9 pages)
- What We Ought To Do The world around us is filled with different people, animals, and different land features. Some we form personal relationships with and others remain indirect relationships. Humans are altruistic beings that have an ethical responsibility to always act in consideration of the interest of others as well as themselves. Based on an analysis of the ideas presented by Peter Singer from a utilitarian perspective, the Utilitarian Moral Theory, and Aldo Leopold’s Land Ethics; I determined that as an ethical and moral agent, I have a responsibility to care and attend to all indirect relationships such as ones involving the earth, animals, and people around me.... [tags: Ethics, Utilitarianism, Morality, Jeremy Bentham]
1234 words (3.5 pages)
- All the ethical models look at this problem very differently. Utilitarian’s would turn to the principle of utility to try and find the outcome that offers the most happiness for the most people. While deontologists would try to find some metric to judge the actions, ignoring the consequences. Perhaps even finding a categorical imperative applied here. Virtue ethics can also judge the morality of this situation from the view on the individual. Delving deeper into each will give us a clearer view of which would be the biggest benefit for mankind to follow.... [tags: Ethics, Morality, Virtue ethics, Immanuel Kant]
918 words (2.6 pages)
- Philosopher and economist Jeremy Bentham decides to mix math with philosophy to what is now known as utilitarianism. Bentham’s goal is to provide happiness. This theory works to an extent, but then goes downhill. The reason Bentham’s theory is so complicated to understand is that it needs to get fixed by his student. His student John Stewart Mill tries to fix the difference between pain and pleasure. With the theory sort of fix people by Stewart Mill people still find it hard to understand how the theory actually works.... [tags: Ethics, Morality, John Stuart Mill, Jeremy Bentham]
1136 words (3.2 pages)
- 1. Utilitarianism was described by J. Bentham as the greatest happiness of the greatest number. Utilitarianism is a holding that the proper course of action is the one that maximizes the amount of happiness. It is therefore a form of consequentialism, which means that the moral value of an action is determined only by its outcome, so one can only weigh the morality of an action after thinking about all its potential consequences. Utilitarianism focuses more on the happiness of the greatest number whereas Aristotle focuses more on the happiness of the individual person Virtue ethics developed by Aristotle which is a moral theory that focuses on the development of virtuous character.... [tags: Ethics, Morality, Virtue ethics, Virtue]
1180 words (3.4 pages)
- The Batman versus The Joker, your typical good versus evil, a conflict that has long held humanity’s interest. It raises the question, though, of what defines goodness and what makes something evil. Often the differentiation is based on morals, which prove to be the subject of discussion for philosophers when they’re going over ethics. This differentiation is also what can be given credit for why good versus evil is so compelling, in media the line between good and evil is often blurred in some places, requiring the viewer to make their own judgement on the ethics of characters, their actions, and their motivations.... [tags: Literary Analysis ]
1486 words (4.2 pages)
- Comparing the Utility of Bentham and Mill utility \U*til"i*ty\, n. [OE. utilite, F. utilit['e], L. utilitas, fr. utilis useful. See Utile.] … 3. Happiness; the greatest good, or happiness, of the greatest number, -- the foundation of utilitarianism. --J. S. Mill. Syn: Usefulness; advantageous; benefit; profit; avail; service. (www.dictionary.com) One of the major players in ethical theories has long been the concept of utilitarianism. Utilitarianism states that in general the ethical rightness or wrongness of an action is directly related to the utility of that action.... [tags: Compare Contrast Comparison Essays]
1916 words (5.5 pages)
- Assess the merits of Utilitarianism (24 Marks) Utilitarianism is a theory aimed at defining one simple basis that can be applied when making any ethical decision. It is based on a human’s natural instinct to seek pleasure and avoid pain. Jeremy Bentham is widely regarded as the father of utilitarianism. He was born in 1748 into a family of lawyers and was himself, training to join the profession. During this process however, he became disillusioned by the state British law was in and set out to reform the system into a perfect one based on the ‘Greatest Happiness Principle,’ ‘the idea that pleasurable consequences are what qualify an action as being morally good’.... [tags: Ethics Morals Philosophy]
1451 words (4.1 pages)
- Why Couldn't Kant Be A Utilitarian. ABSTRACT: In his essay "Could Kant Have Been a Utilitarian?", R. M. Hare tries to show that Kant's moral theory contains utilitarian elements and it can be properly asked if Kant could have been a utilitarian, though in fact he was not. I take seriously Hare's challenge to the standard view because I find his reading on the whole reasonable enough to lead to a consistent interpretation of Kant's moral philosophy. Still, I hardly believe that it is necessarily concluded from Hare's reading that Kant could have been a utilitarian.... [tags: Philosophy Philosophical Argumentative Papers]
3248 words (9.3 pages)
- Attitudes toward democracy The word "democracy" is a tricky one, and it is important to bear in mind that it meant different things to different people in the 19th century, Just as it does today. For some mid-Victorians the word democracy was a term of abuse. But for many others, it was worth pursuing, but not to be taken too far. John Stuart Mill and Jeremy Bentham were a famous thinkers and philosophers who held an important attitudes toward democracy. Each one of them call for a different theory toward suffrage and the right to vote.... [tags: Politics]
877 words (2.5 pages)