More handpicked essays just for you.
Racism in public schools and how it effects education
Impact of stereotypes
Impacts of stereotypes on society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Stereotyping of Minority Students
Throughout most of my school years, before attending MCTC, I had
never experienced inter-racial schooling. I went to a small high school
with about twenty minority students. These students were not outcasts they
were treated as any other non-minority student. Therefore, I had little
experience with minorities in a non-minority school. After the speech that
was given by Michael Jefferson, I was more informed on the effects of
stereotyping of minority students in a non-minority school.
Stereotyping may cause students and teachers to view minority
students on a non-minority campus as inferior. This may cause some
teachers or faculty members to believe that these minority students are not
as capable of achieving the same quality of work as non-minority students.
Scholarships are sometimes given out to non0minority students due to their
racial background. I suppose this happens due to the stereotype of
minority students not being capable of the educational work as that of
other students. Classroom behavior toward minority students may be shown
in appropriate, and/or unrecognized. For instance, a teacher may call on a
non-minority student before a minority student. The teacher may pick on
the non-minority due to a belief that these students care about their
schooling, whereas minority students are being pre-judged without the
chance to really learn. Some people even believe that combining the
different minorities may cause problems.
Combining minority with non-minority students can create some
conflict. Some non-minority students, this attitude of aggression may be
brought on by "close-minded" non-minority students. These students let
their attitude take over their learning time, by worrying about the other
minority students. Each student, whether thy be minority or non-minority,
must put their mind on learning than on another minority on the campus.
Some students may see that combining minority with non-minority students,
as a way of learning about different people and their cultures. I f
students would open their eyes as they do their ears for learning, students
would see a whole new possibility of meeting others, not minding if they
are a minority or not. These students should also learn to use their own
ideas, and not always to believe in the media point of view.
Today the media is a major source of minority and non-minority
The world of today is a relatively primitive one, even with every advancement that humanity has accomplished we remain primitive in this aspect. There has been progress, even as slow in comparison to that of todays, it is progress.The ignorances and other human flaws are still very existent within every society, regardless of the boundaries between them be it geographical or cultural. Stereotypes and misconceptions exist in the modern society. Stereotypes arise when there is a single radical group who are accepted as the representation of their apparent subculture. Then the ignorant and misinformed take these “representatives’” behavior as a generalization of the entire group. While the less common misconception is made by some incomprehensible anomaly where an entire assumption is based around a single social group, that has never even proved to be true. There is a stereotype that is attached with the College educated community, they are believed to be almost guaranteed success. The fact that they have a degree in their respective field has built a stereotype of the “successful ones.”
In the essay “Campus Diversity and Student Self-Segregation: Separating Myths from Facts” by Debra Humphreys, the writer explains the research conducted on racial and ethnic groups in many diverse universities. Humphrey’s cites recent research of diversity and self-segregation on college campuses to determine the benefits of each. Humphrey’s first gives us her point of view of self-segregation in which she thinks it doesn’t have a positive impact on students today in the classroom and later on in life. She believes that diversity is an “essential ingredient in many students’ persistence and success in college.” (575, Hoeffner and Hoeffner).
Juvenile delinquency is a relatively new phenomenon. For this reason, society’s reactions and solutions to the problem of delinquency are also modern developments. The United States developed the first youth court in 1899 and is now home to many new and formerly untested methods of juvenile rehabilitation and correction. One of many unique programs within the Juvenile Justice system, boot camps are institutions designed to keep delinquent juveniles out of traditional incarceration facilities and still provide a structured method of punishment and rehabilitation. Boot camps developed in the early 1990s and quickly proliferated throughout the nation. Specifically, they are “…short-term residential programs modeled after military basic training facilities” (Meade & Steiner, 2010). Designed with the goal of reducing recidivism and preventing violent offenses, boot camps target non-violent individuals under the age of 18 and typically exclude already violent offenders. In theory, boot camps apprehend juveniles while they are committing minor delinquency and prevent more-serious crime by “giving the juvenile offender a more optimistic, community oriented outlook” (Ravenell, 2002). Fundamentally, boot camps have four central purposes; rehabilitation, punishment, deterrence, and cost control (Muscar, 2008).
The recent media obsession with the scared straight program, juvenile boot camps and other scare tactics has lead to the question as to whether they actually are beneficial or not in treating adolescent criminal recidivism. On television programs like Maury (Pauvich) the answer to treating the troubled young girls who are brought to the show is boot camp. Those in charge take these girls to prisons, dangerous streets at night and often morgues to make a visual argument as to where they will end up as a result of the path they've taken. They also go through a rigorous run with drill sergeants to break down their egos. Of course it only last one day as opposed to any length of time a judge would sentence, but they get a small taste of it. Without surprise, at the end of every program of this nature, all the girls are rehabilitated and promise to go back to school, quit drugs, stealing, prostituting, and stop the abusive behavior.
The Panacea Phenomenon project has consequences, that’s can cause problems depending on the young adult, because they may have a different way of learning speeds and behaviors, the comprehension levels are all different. Harsh discipline replaces anger and confusion among teenagers and their behavior. Parents have a big role to play in their teenager’s life, as some parent’s work all day leaving the kids being raised on their own, with nanny’s or other after care programs where kids can learn from negative influences from other kids. As studies have shown, television also has a negative influence on a teenager’s life by influencing their outlook on life with crime programs and violence. Many people have question if boot camp should be a short term program or a life style for juvenile delinquents; many have agreed that boot camp can help give them some type of structure, will help them later on life. In the United States (U.S.), the General Accounting Office (1993) reported that 26 states were operating 57 boot camps for young adults in the spring of 1992. Boot camps could hold up to a total of 8,800 recruits. The American Institute for Research (1993), appraised boot camps and found that the goal of juvenile boot camps where not made to punish offenders, but to rehabilitate them,
Boot camp programs operate under a military-like routine wherein young offenders convicted of less serious, nonviolent crimes are confined for a short period of time, typically from 3 to 6 months (Parent, 1989). They are given close supervision while being exposed to a demanding regimen of strict discipline, physical training, drill, inspections, and physical labor. All the programs also incorporate some degree of military structure and discipline. They follow new strict rules that they are not use to which include the following: (1) Basic training program inmates shall not enter the rooms of other inmates.
“The Pros and Cons of Sending Your Child to a Boot Camp for Naughty Kids.” Teen Boot Camps. N.p., n.d. Web. 2 Mar. 2014. .
This outlet for rehabilitation has been found to be popular by the public, but not as popular as mediation, and it’s results on whether or not juveniles are improving from it is unclear, “whether the desired affects are actually achieved, and whether boot camps actually affect recidivism any more than traditional incarceration, remains questionable” (1). Research shows that boot camps apply structure and education to juveniles who lack these skills, while also being tough on them for the crime that they’ve committed (1).” This option isn’t as widely accepted because of those who think this treatment is too cruel (2). Boot camps for juveniles started in the 1800s, and were once banned for a period of time (1). Not too long ago, boot camps were reintroduced with less harsh circumstance, most of which have included a daily routine the juveniles have to follow and also have included basic education within their treatment process (2). The camps have mixed reviews due to their inconclusive research results. In some instances, such as in the city of Cleveland, 72% of youth that were studies were found to commit new offenses. However, in studies done in Denver, the re-offense rate was only 39% (1). Despite the opposing statistics, the youth in Cleveland were found to be 68% more likely to improve a grade level in language and reading skills and two-thirds were found to go back to school or work on getting a GED (1). These statistic
This fact has important implications for our thoughts about the relation between individuals and society” (Berger 2013). Semiotics is a tool used to uncover how meaning is created, communicated, and perceived in structuralism. The process of semiotics is described by Barthes as, “…a science of forms, since it studies significations apart from their content” (Barthes 1972). By attaching meaning to signs and symbols, semiotics helps us understand the world we live
Juvenile delinquents who have committed crimes from low risk to high risk offenders are often sent to Military style boot camps as opposed to prison. Being in the Military myself, I know exactly how a boot camp is ran. Judges, the public, and politicians promote boot camps as opposed to prison. However, research has shown that boot camps are not successful in keeping juvenile delinquents out of handcuffs. Military based boot camps for juveniles are not effective in reducing recidivism because boot camps model aggressive behavior, bond delinquents together, target unnecessary needs, and the juveniles are forced to attend.
This source will equip the argument for utilizing diversity as an educational apparatus that supports student development and learning. The showcase of impact of diversity student engagement will definitely be useful for providing a strong reasoning for showcasing how the experience of students in the US schooling system shapes the educational experiences of diversified student group.
Semiotics delivers a sense of structure to further understand what deeply lies beneath a piece of text. Often, the study of semiotics is incomplete without the interpretation of signs, which are then used to understand how reality is socially constructed. An American philosopher Charles Sanders Peirce (1839-1914) and Swiss linguist Ferdinand de Saussure (1857-1913) are said to have created the modern system of semiotic analysis, particularly claiming that "this universe is perfused with signs, if it is not composed exclusively of signs." (Zeman, 1977, p.24) If it is said that everything is to be composed of signs, as Peirce states, how might one go about interpreting substance in their everyday life? Substance, or texts, that we consume daily,
Most people find stereotypes to be obnoxious, especially when they have to do with sensitive subjects like gender or race. “Stereotyping is a generalization about a group or category of people that can have a powerful influence on how we perceive others and their communication behaviors” (Floyd, 61). Because they underestimate the differences among individuals in a group, stereotyping can lead to inaccurate and offensive perceptions of other people. Although stereotypes are prevalent in almost every society, becoming aware of our perceptions of others, as well as differentiating between both positive and negative stereotypes can help us overcome those stereotypes.
The newest "brain-storm" that politicians have dwelled upon is sending young offenders that commit serious offences to boot camp. The first question that comes to mind is what is a boot camp? A boot camp is an alternative place to send youths between the ages of 12-17 who commit serious criminal offences. Boot camps have five basic goals: (1) incapacitation, (2) deterrence, (3) rehabilitation, (4) reduction of prison costs and crowding, and (5) punishment (Colledge & Gerber, 1998). These facilities are designed to resocialize the "bad-boys" and "bad-girls" into citizens that will be accepted back into society. The plan is to use a military style to punish the kids and in return teach them discipline and transform them back to law abiding citizens . "Punishment ranges from rigorous exercise - running extra laps...
...trated in the inner city where the worst, most impoverished schools are located. Therefore, even if they wish to attend school, they still receive have less access to good teachers and a good learning environment. And perhaps the most detrimental issue that minorities face is that they are often stigmatized as inferior. This causes them to be treated differently and it causes them to have low expectations for themselves, which leads to poor performance.