Monopolistic Competition In Monopoly Or Monopoly

728 Words2 Pages

In the marketplace, consumers will have more purchasing power in a monosomy market than a monopoly where the sole producer has the power. Monopolies form in several situations, typically through entry barriers or government regulation. The government can relegate a new monopoly in a market that is owned by the government. If one where to think of an example of a government-owned monopoly in Ontario, the first thing that may come to mind for university students would be the LCBO. For those students who have every traveled to any other province, they would find many sellers in the liquor market. This is monopolistic competition. One of the benefits of having monopolistic competition, is that the prices are lower as sellers are competing against each other for business. As a result, the prices are nearly half of what they are in Ontario and better service since the buyer has the power in the transaction. The prices are higher in this monopoly because the LCBO can charge higher prices for those willing to pay, resulting in a firm …show more content…

In a recent report, claiming consumers could pay less for liquor and the province could create more profit from alcohol sales if the government opened up the business to more retailers. This report stated that the LCBO is actually foregoing revenue by preserving its virtual monopoly on the sale of alcohol. Deregulating alcohol sales would increase the choices available and reduce prices for Ontario consumers, as well as improve the competitiveness of Ontario 's smaller wineries and breweries and generate more revenue for the government. The government creates the deadweight loss with its reasoning that they sell alcohol in a socially responsible manner compared to the free market would. This has been debated by Ontarians since alcohol and tobacco products have been sold in other provinces abiding age restrictions without

More about Monopolistic Competition In Monopoly Or Monopoly

Open Document