The Battle of Thermopylae

1139 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Critical Analysis

THESIS STATEMENT
At the time of the Persian Wars, King Leonidas saw the Battle of Thermopylae as a way for the Greeks to delay the Persian Advance into Greece.
PURPOSE STATEMENT
Through textual references based on The Battle of Thermopylae, critical analysis and research, it is certain that the Battle of Thermopylae was meant to stall the Persian forces.
INTRODUCTION
Taking into account the lack of numbers in the Spartan army, they could not have picked a better place to host this battle than at Thermopylae. The Spartans battle tactics helped them hold their position for the extensive time that they fought. Despite the size of the vast Persian army, Leonidas fought to the last man. His aim was not on preserving his men but only buying time for the rest of Greece.
LOCATION IS EVERYTHING
The Battle of Thermopylae could not have worked out any better for the Spartans. The mountainous hot springs of Thermopylae were the perfect place for the 300 to lay down their lives. Thermopylae’s landscape was full with mountains surrounding the left and right flank of the Spartans, and had an opening just wide enough for the Spartans to fight while the Persians struggled to squeeze into the close quarters with their massive number of men. The Gorge of Asopos (See figure 1-1 and Figure 1-2) also provided an active defense during the wars. Burn states “it was guarded by a walled stronghold of the local Greeks on top of the cliffs” (Burn 90). This Gorge served as a major obstacle for the Persians. This was the most defended point leading into Greece, and by far the hardest to infiltrate. The Encyclopedia of World Biography states “the Persian army would have to disrupt their formations to enter the mouth of the Pass and once inside would hav...

... middle of paper ...

... ready to take on the role of a militaristic Spartan. The tactics they used to take on the Persians were practiced and perfected over years of experience and training. This helped them hold their position for the expansive period of time that they did. This quote from N. S. Gill’s article Battle of Thermopylae states “Spartan King Leonidas was general in charge of the Greek forces that tried to restrain the vast Persian army, to delay them . . . Leonidas may have hoped to block them long enough that Xerxes would have to sail away for food and water”. This quote is saying that Leonidas had not hoped to defeat the Persians but only to hold them off until reinforcements arrived to join the war.
These valiant efforts were not all for nothing. The 300 Spartans and Leonidas are dead. But they died knowing that their battles would one day help Greece defeat the Persians.

Show More
Related

  • Battle Of Thermopylae Essay

    2584 Words  | 6 Pages

    The Battle of Thermopylae was the first between the Greeks and Persians during the Persian invasion of 480 – 479BC. The Greek force was very small compared to the Persians but was determined to make a stand against the huge army of 300,000 Persians suggested by modern historians compared to Herodotus account of the army consisting of 1700 000 men. The Greeks chose to defend a narrow pass, or gap, between the mountains of central Greece and the sea, called Thermopylae.

    Read More

  • The Role of Themistocles in the Greek Defeat of the Persians in 480 - 479 BC.

    1485 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Role of Themistocles in the Greek Defeat of the Persians in 480 - 479 BC.

    Read More

  • The Heroism, Divine Support, and Greek Unity Displayed in the Persian Wars

    2236 Words  | 5 Pages

    (http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/cgi-bin/text?lookup-trm+ov+8.5&vers=engligh&browse+1). In conclusion, the Greeks defeated the Persians in the Persian Wars aided by unforgettable acts of heroism, divine support, and most importantly, Greek unity.

    Read More

  • Themistocles: The Battle Of Salamis

    2095 Words  | 5 Pages

    The image seen below is a Troezen Decree; an inscription proposed by Themistocles in preparation for the battle of Salamis. Within this primary artefact, he states that the Athenians should evacuate their homes and battle against the Persian invaders. Just as the previous sources and their implicit meanings, Themistocles was obviously a man who maintained influence over the Athenian people; he logically took the risk of forcing the entire community to leave Athens for the greater good of society. Though, it is the fact that the Athenians listened to Themistocles’ risk induced proposal that truly exemplifies his unconditional leadership. Reinforcing these ideals are that of Herodotus’ accounts of Themistocles during the Battle of Salamis. Acclaimed as a great historian of Greek history, Herodotus details that the Greeks were about to leave Salamis; however, by utilizing blackmail to enforce that the Athenians would be forced to sail to Italy, Themistocles convinced the entire population to remain at Salamis. Herodotus then explains that Themistocles sent a messenger to inform Xerxes that he should attack the bay of Salamis immediately; and, Xerxes fell for this devious plan, where the Persian fleet entered at nightfall. Because of the bay being too narrow, though, the Persians were under attack and were forced to retreat. Herodotus’ retellings of these events imply that Themistocles organized events so perfectly for a planned defeat. The manipulation of the Greeks to stay at Salamis through the means of blackmail reveals how intellectually intact Themistocles was and that he would stop at nothing to achieve his goal. Having the knowledge that Salamis and its narrow bay would be such a simple yet effective method of defeat, this solidifies that Themistocles

    Read More

  • Themistocles Essay

    1224 Words  | 3 Pages

    When the Persian fleet had arrived at Aphetae, Eurybides, the commander of the small amount of ships that Sparta had sent, wished to turn tail, and return home. Themistocles used bribe of thirty talents to keep him, and his ships at the front. (Herodotus, 1954) Themistocles, seeing the overwhelming navy of the Persians conducted a plan: When the fighting broke out, the highly-trained Greeks would allow themselves to become encircled. At the first blow of the signal horn, the triremes would form a ‘close circle – bows outward, sterns to the centre.’ From this position, they had no mobility; the only direction in which they could move was forward, and that is exactly what they did. On the second signal blast, these lighter and faster Greek triremes rammed the Persian ships, and with their bronze-sheathed battering rams on the bow of the ships, caused great damage to the enemy ships. (Herodotus, 1954) Another tactic that Themistocles used was his discussion to initiate the battle in the mid to late afternoon. One cannot fight at sea when dark, and he knew that; making sure that this was done minimised casualties for the Greeks and tired out the Persian men, who had been ready to begin fighting since the very early morning. Overall, this decision made sure the battle had a fast conclusion. When they got word of the massacre at Thermopylae, however, Themistocles called a retreat, as they were only holding the pass to prevent Xerxes using his navy to assist his men at Thermopylae, and at this moment in time, there were no men at Thermopylae that were worth protecting, anymore. (Last Stand of the 300,

    Read More

  • Analysis of the Battle of Thermopylae

    1519 Words  | 4 Pages

    The battle of Thermopylae was the Greek’s first stand against the massive army of King Xerxes, and was the most influential battle of the entire war. Up to this point, the Persian army was seen as too massive and powerful to be stopped. The once warring city-states of Greece knew they couldn’t stand against the Persians alone, and knew in order to defend their homeland they would have to unite. A unity of command was agreed upon; King Leonidas of Sparta was chosen to lead the Greek forces. He was chosen to lead because of the unsurpassed warring abilities the Spartans were so well known for made him perfect for the objective of stopping the Persians.

    Read More

  • A review on Gates of Fire - Steven Pressfield

    1265 Words  | 3 Pages

    In 480 BC the Persian Empire was once again trying to invade ancient Greece. Under the reign of King Xerxes, an invincible army of a recorded 2 million was marching downwards to enslave all Greeks. An elite force of three hundred Spartans tackled the suicide mission of stalling the Persian wave of doom.

    Read More

  • King Leonidas I of Ancient Sparta

    1637 Words  | 4 Pages

    Leonidas was respected in Sparta, it was not by his often effective but not morally decisions, it was to resolve an issue when he felt that somebody or something was trying to hurt Sparta. Leonidas was expected to put an end with some abnormal answer. The training, the form i...

    Read More

  • Gates of Fire

    2763 Words  | 6 Pages

    Before Xeones became a squire he tells of the agoge, which is the thirteen year training program for the Spartan youth. He tells about Alexandros and how they became close friends through the years of training. When Xeones becomes Dienekes squire all of his duties change and he started to see more of the battles. He tells of the many battles he was at and what they were like. Xeones explains the bravery of the Spartans when they were in battle and what the individual soldiers were like. Eventually the Spartans learn that the Persian army was coming to take over all of Greece. Xeones then explains what the Spartans did to prepare for the invasion. The Spartan army sent a group of three hundred highly trained soldiers to Thermopylae to defend the pass until the rest of Greece could prepare their armies.

    Read More

  • The Failure of Xerxes’ Invasion of Greece

    2119 Words  | 5 Pages

    While the army reached Thermopylae intact, the fleet suffered at the hand of two storms, with Herodotus attributing them to God attempting to equalize the opposing forces . The disparity between the size of the Persian and the size of the Greek forces was huge – thus, the Greeks’ strategy relied on geography . Holding the narrows at Thermopylae and the concurrent straits of Artemisium meant that Xerxes’ numerical superiority was reduced. It was here, on land and sea, that Greece showcased the superiority of it...

    Read More

  • The Causes and Effects of the Peloponnesian War

    1350 Words  | 3 Pages

    When examining the causes for the Peloponnesian War, which was between 431-404 B.C., there are a number of causes that factored into the cause of this war. However, one of the most important causes to this war was largely due to the fact that the Spartans feared the growing power and success of Athens. The Spartans were “particularly alarmed at the growing power of Athens” (Cartwright, “Peloponnesian War”). During the Persian war in 479 BC, Athens grew fiercely strong with power with help of its many allies and continued with their no mercy attacks on Persian territories. When the Persians left Greece, Athens further enraged Sparta when they built large and tall walls around its empire in the event of an attack, which was mostly thought to be from Sparta if it happened.

    Read More

  • Peloponnesian War

    2670 Words  | 6 Pages

    Although the Spartans and Athenians fought for almost 20 years, there was a time when they lived in harmony. Almost 15 years before any disturbances the Athenians and Spartans fought together in the Persian war. During the Persian war, the Spartans were thriving in their fight against the Persians, however over time the Persians began to grow stronger. After being to lose their fighting streak, the Athenians came in to help the Spartans and bring an end to Persian dominance once and for all (The Delian League, 1). After defeating the Persians in 449 B.C., the...

    Read More

  • Gates of Fire, by Steven Pressfield

    2508 Words  | 6 Pages

    In Sparta, Xeones became a helot and he was given to a Spartan soldier named Dienekes. Xeones was trained to fight like a Spartan and later became Dienekes’s battle squire. When Xeones was about twenty, the Spartan king, Leonidas, announced that three hundred Spartan men would be sent on a suicide mission to Thermopylae to hold off the invading Persian army. Dienekes was chosen to go. On the first and second day of battle, many Persians were killed, but only a few Greeks. At the end of the second day, Xerxes found a secret path where part of his army could go through and completely surround the Greeks on the next day. Leonidas was informed of this and sent a group of Spartans, including Xeones and Dienekes, on an unsuccessful mission to kill Xerxes. On the third day, the Persians surrounded the Spartans and they all were killed.

    Read More

  • Why the Greeks Won the Greco-Persian War

    1577 Words  | 4 Pages

    There are times in history that something will happen and it will defy all logic. It was one of those times when a few Greek city/states joined together and defeated the invasion force of the massive Persian Empire. The Greeks were able to win the Greco-Persian War because of their naval victories over the Persians, a few key strategic victories on land, as well as the cause for which they were fighting. The naval victories were the most important contribution to the overall success against the Persians. The Persian fleet was protecting the land forces from being outflanked and after they were defeated the longer had that protection. While the Greeks had very few overall victories in battle they did have some strategic victories. The Battle of Thermopylae is an example of a strategic success for the Greeks. The morale of the Persian army was extremely affected by the stout resistance put up by King Leonidas and his fellow Spartans. The Greeks fought so hard against overwhelming odds because of what they were fighting for. They were fighting for their country and their freedom. They fought so hard because they did not want to let down the man next to them in the formation. Several things contributed to the Greeks success against the Persian invasion that happened during the Second Greco-Persian War.

    Read More

  • Analysis Of The Battle Of Salamis

    1355 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Battle of Salamis is said to be one of the most important battles in all of history. It was a naval battle fought between the massive Persian army and smaller Greek army in the Bay of Salamis in 480 BCE. This battle was one of the many battles that were a part of the Greco-Persian war. This paper will explore the events leading up to the battle, the battle itself, including advantages and disadvantages both sides had on one and other, and finally will discuss the affects the result of this battle had on each side. Surprisingly, the much smaller Greek army defeated the Persians at the Battle of Salamis. How did this happen, one may ask? Although the Persians appeared to have the military advantage in this battle, particularly in terms of sheer size and numbers, the Greeks successfully defeated them with the help of their leaders, tactics, and many Persian blunders.

    Read More

More about The Battle of Thermopylae

Open Document