The First Amendment gives us our right to free speech, which includes the right to read and write books that may be too violent, offensive or hateful for others. The law states that the one wanting to remove said book(s) has to have an inquiry made of the motivation and intentions for wanting the removal. Justice William Brennan reasoned that the First Amendment right to express ideas must be supported by an implied right to receive information and ideas (Claire Mullally, 2002). The First Amendment of the Constitution protects the students’ rights to know and the teachers’ rights to academic freedom. When banning books, not only is it going against the First Amendment, it is creating a form of censorship. Henry Reichman says that censorship is “the removal, suppression, or restricted circulation of literary, artistic or educational materials…on the grounds that these are morally or otherwise objectionable in light of the standards applied by the censor,” (Sharon Cromwell, 2005).
While the First Amendment gives us the right to...
... middle of paper ...
...eading, or surrender yourself to self-chosen ignorance” (Yarbrough, 2012). The First Amendment protects our rights of free speech, but people do not respect that and challenge it. Book banning violates academic freedom and diversity of thought, but some think it is wrong for children to learn about sex, and slavery. While book banning discourages creativeness and critical thinking, libraries have the right to remove a book if it is put on the banned list. So think about how you feel about books and what they mean to you. I love books and hate the fact that one would ever be removed from a shelf, no matter how “inappropriate” people may think they are. So, again, think about it from a reader’s point of view on how book banning IS against our First Amendment, how it DOES restrict learning, and how it DOES discourage children’s creativeness and their critical thinking.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- At a community college in Yucaipa, California, Tara Schultz’s request to censor and remove the books Fun Home, Y: The Last Man, The Sandman, and Persepolis from her college English 250 course was denied. Her arguments being that the books contained mature and graphic content, which offended her, and these books should not be read by anyone else. Her professor Ryan Bartlett defended his decision to include these books saying that, “I chose several highly acclaimed, award winning graphic novels ...... [tags: Education, University, Student, Freedom of speech]
954 words (2.7 pages)
- America is a nation founded upon a set of unified core beliefs that were never meant to be opposed or infringed upon known as the Bill of Rights. As America has grown and developed over the years, these core beliefs do not seem to be as sacred as they once were. Many great pieces of art and literature have been produced, but society expectations of what is acceptable. Censorship occurs when a group of people impose their beliefs upon others, thus removing material at the request of the group. Book censorship is one of few areas that are censored from the public, and it is a shame that a select few individuals can determine what is acceptable and what is not.... [tags: First Amendment, Banning Books]
1082 words (3.1 pages)
- Ever since pen was first put to paper there has been some form of censorship surrounding it. The most current form of censorship is to ban the books which are viewed as inappropriate. Such an act not only violates the rights of American citizens, but it also violates the rights of the students to learn. Even if the government could manage to ban all of the books that it feels are inappropriate, the thirst to read such books would only grow. Too often is it forgotten that before the banning of books was an “at home issue,” (Book Banning 1) the federal government tried to cut the flow of inappropriate information off at the source By forbidding the reading of certain books, the first amendme... [tags: Censorship]
1070 words (3.1 pages)
- Books have been banned/censored throughout history. For example, the Catholic Church created the Index of Banned Books in the 1500s. The goal of the Index was to prevent the general population from reading books that went contrary to the Church’s teachings. Some of Galileo’s books were in this list. Anyone caught reading or selling these books was severely punished, tortured, or even killed. 500 years later, however, book banning still occurs. There are hundreds of books being challenged every year in the United States, for various reasons.... [tags: literature censorship]
699 words (2 pages)
- The practice of the censorship of books in schools has been prevalent due to the explicit content of them. Parents have been complaining to schools about books that count as required reading because they disapprove with the points made in the book. If a book consists of offensive or sexually explicit material, then parents would challenge the schools about them in order to prevent their children from reading them. Censorship in general has been an intensely debated issue because it is considered an infringement to the First Amendment of the United States Constitution while others argue it is used to conceal inappropriate things (Aliprandini and Sprague).... [tags: censorship, required readings, creativity]
973 words (2.8 pages)
- All of us know about the crimes committed every day by people all over the world. Theft, assault, grand theft auto, underage drinking, fraud, prostitution, and rape. But what about crimes on the internet. Last year, SOPA (Stop Online Piracy Act) was introduced to the world. If this bill was passed, many sites would have to censor certain pieces of information, as well as remove a lot of the content already uploaded. SOPA would also crack down on terminating torrent sites, which are used to share files such as music, movies, video games, e-books, and whatever else is a digital file.... [tags: attempts against the first ammendment]
1665 words (4.8 pages)
- The bill of rights was established to Americans to protect them from the government, to ensure that there would be no confusion where the line stood. One of those rights is the 4th amendment which states per constitution, “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effect, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.” Because the rules of the land are so important in protecting the people, the criminal justice system has to abide by the rules stated.... [tags: Fourth Amendment to the US Constitution]
1331 words (3.8 pages)
- On the other hand - Rightly decided Authors and legal professionals all mostly argue that the decision goes against law and is therefore wrong, there is, which I consider, a strong argument for it being right. Statute is our supreme law and it is thus constitutional that parliament has complete sovereignty when it comes to our legal system. To that effect judges are only there to apply and interpret the law. This brings forth the question of, why wouldn’t we apply the Contractual Mistakes Act 1977, when parliament enacted it to help the courts to mitigate arbitrary effects of mistakes on contracts.... [tags: Contract, Law, Common law, Contractual term]
795 words (2.3 pages)
- Harassment and bullying are two of the most difficult challenges to overcome in any organization. At schools, a peaceful, safe, all-inclusive learning environment must be created and kept to achieve the student learning. However, schools are mirrors of the society in which they stand. Administrators should lead the way, by establishing a zero-tolerance policy against both unfair practices: harassment and bullying. Likewise, to limit, or in a utopia, eliminate all forms of harassment or bullying, it is not only the creation of the policies, but the spread of awareness about the issue and the enforcement of students’ code of conduct what will get results.... [tags: First Amendment to the United States Constitution]
1586 words (4.5 pages)
- Against the Federal Marriage Amendment The word marriage means many things to many different people. To some people marriage is a religious ceremony, and should remain a religious union, without any interaction by the government. For others marriage is a legal contract, which should benefit both parties involved in the marriage. According Wikipedia.com, most people define marriage as “(1) the state of being united to a person of the opposite sex as a husband or wife in a consensual and contractual relationship recognized by law (2) the state of being united to a person of the same sex in a relationship like that of the traditional relationship.” Not only has the type of contract marriage i... [tags: civil liberties, rhetorical essays]
1719 words (4.9 pages)