1. To discourage the young and old people from smoking and consuming tobacco products the government of India imposed a ban on all advertisements of tobacco products. One of the main reasons why cigarette advertising was banned in India was was due to the hazardous health issues arising from smoking tobacco. Tobacco was considered the most dangerous product consumed by humans. The website, http://www.icmrindia.org/free%20resources/casestudies/ban-tobacco-ads11.htm, states that, “According to world health organization tobacco accounted for over 3 million deaths in 1990, the figure rising to 4,023 million deaths in 1998, it was estimated that tobacco related deaths would rise to 8.4million in about 2030.” …show more content…
It was believed that consumers would not be able to distinguish between the low qualities of tobacco and highly refined ones. Which would eventually lead to a decrease in smoking harsh tobacco products. More refined tobacco would be to eliminate tobacco products entirely from their lives. Further research showed that banning of advertisement in smoking would only prove to work if they were properly put into effect, with a tobacco control policy.
2. The opposing ban on tobacco advertising argument to the ban on tobacco advertising argued that many people would lose their jobs as needs and wants for tobacco decreased. According to the article, the tobacco industry provided employment to 26 million people. Another important argument was that banning tobacco advertisements would not reduce the consumers’ consumption for cigarettes. This was because the ban did not take into account other markets of India. India had low graded tobacco products which were considered a ritual of tradition. Products such as beedi and ghutkas or even hookas were more common than cigarettes. For this reason the ban did not have its desired effect. The website http://www.icmrindia.org/free%20resources/casestudies/ban-tobacco-ads11.htm states
…show more content…
So where do the governments draw the line.
3. The government of India is facing a conflict of interest where there is a moral and ethical dilemma of health and welfare of the general public. Especially the youth are getting addicted to tobacco products by enticements of ads of smoking- This addiction has led to Lung cancer, respiratory diseases resulting in death. There is also an increase in the cost of healthcare burdening the government. This issue is in direct conflict with the profits of tobacco companies. For these companies, supporters and sponsors of tobacco products, health issues are not important, profits come first at the expense of the people.
Another conflict of interest is , if the government had a right to impose their decisions on the people. Many companies in opposition to the ban government had no right to thread on the free will of the people. It was their choice to smoke or not. Each person should decide for themselves. The
The tobacco industry seems like a beneficial addition to our economy. It has basically been a socially acceptable business in the past because it brings jobs to our people and tax money to the government to redistribute; but consider the cost of tobacco related treatment, mortality and disability- it exceeds the benefit to the producer by two hundred billion dollars US. (4) Tobacco is a very profitable industry determined to grow despite government loss or public health. Its history has demonstrated how money can blind morals like an addiction that is never satisfied. Past lawsuits were mostly unsuccessful because the juries blamed the smoker even though the definition of criminal negligence fits the industry’s acts perfectly. Some may argue for the industry in the name of free enterprise but since they have had such a clear understanding of the dangers of their product it changes the understanding of their business tactics and motives. The success of the industry has merely been a reflection of its immoral practices. These practices have been observed through its use of the media in regards to children, the tests that used underage smokers, the use of revenue to avoid the law, the use of nicotine manipulation and the suppression of research.
Cigarette business has now sprung from a small shop to a very large corperation. Cigarette businesses are not just a business now, it is considered to be a money machine. It is a huge industrial business around the world providing many jobs and creating massive revenue. So many people are put at risk to these businesses directly and indirectly. The owners and workers of the tobacco companies both take this as their source of primary income. They can easily support their family through this business if the businesses aren 't hoarding all revenue for themselves. Producing cigarettes has become one of the most profitable business, not to mention one of the biggest industries in the whole world. The government receives huge amounts of money from cigarette companies from the taxes they pay alone. Cigarette use is in the workplace of many people around the world. Though many people can be benefited through this business it is not worth what comes from cigarette use. The government is getting huge sums of money from the sale and distribution of cigarettes. So, making the same and manufacturing of cigarettes illegal will definitely hurt the government and add pressures to many people who are in need of a job or looking for one. As a result, through this business, it creates a source of income for the workers and owners of companies big and small. But some people may argue that the physical health risks from smoking, financial as well as social risks occur along with this. A person, who smokes on a regular basis also may spend a majority of his money on buying cigarette or other tobacco products. The average pack of cigarettes costs the consumer four dollars per pack. Annually , that would cost a person an average of 1500 dollars at least for cigarettes . When the person is hospitalized due to use of cigarettes, his medical expenses
Cigarette advertisements reflect society’s love-hate relationship with tobacco products through the ages. During its heyday of popularity, cigarette advertisements were not governed in any way, allowing tobacco companies to use any means necessary to sell their products including advertising during popular children’s television shows. This practice came under scrutiny around 1964 when the Surgeon General released its first report on “smoking and health.” This report stated that smoking may be hazardous to your health. Soon to follow the release of this report was a ban on all cigarette advertisements on television and radio.
Every cigarette that a person smokes reduces their life span by eleven minutes. Banning the sale of tobacco products would prevent many deaths. Not only would it prevent death of the ones that use tobacco products but also for the ones that are exposed to second hand smoke. People who are addicted to tobacco products spend a lot of money on their habit. The use of tobacco products and being exposed to second hand smoke will later lead to many health problems and possibly death. The sale of tobacco products should be banned because people are wasting their money by buying them, it causes many health problems that could lead to death, and it not only affects the one using it but it also affects the people around them.
There is clearly no way tobacco will never be outlawed but I believe there should be tighter restrictions on age limits throughout the world, and restrictions on the materials that are used in cigarette processing. Who is just letting cigarette companies continue to poison people and cause cancer risk? Throughout my essay I will analyze the affects of cigarette use on the society of the world and the elaborate corruption that keeps cigarette companies in business.
The government of India has many arguments in favor of the ban on tobacco advertising. One of the arguments is the right of the government to step in and promote a healthier lifestyle. Many of the tobacco advertising companies stated that the ban on advertising was unconstitutional, but the supreme court in Belgium and France both agreed that the ban was not unconstitutional and was needed the ensure the public health. In 1990 tobacco attributed to over 3 million deaths and escalated to 4.023 million deaths in 1998. Studies show that when people quit smoking they spend their money in different sectors of the economy creating more jobs and economic growth. Tobacco consumption in countries that had a ban showed a dramatic decrease in consumers
Government is trying to stop people from smoking tobacco they are increasing the money up so that the people don’t buy that much tobacco smokes. Some ads show people what smoking does to the human body.
Tobacco use is a debate worldwide and everyone has their own opinions about the issue. This is such a controversial issue because of the many different health risks, weather it is beneficial or not, the harmful aspect, and its importance of an individual’s freedom. Tobacco has no general advantages towards someone’s health, as it destroys the lungs and can cause cancer anywhere in the body from all the carcinogens. In my opinion the production and sale of tobacco should be banned in the United States.
Through out its long and devastating history, the cigarette and it’s advertising have had devastating sociological impacts and economic impacts. Tobacco companies attempted to appeal to various underprivileged or minority groups in society, have made money based off addiction and cancer, and have costed society loads of money. With the advertising bans and restrictions that came in both Canada in 1988 (Dunsmuir), and the United States in 1971 (Qi 215), the industry was heavily impacted, and smoking prevalence has since been at an all new low since it peaked. Cigarettes are once again being associated as something negative, just as they were when they first emerged (Gardner 13), and may one day be a thing of the
...any issues surrounding tobacco smoking such as heart disease, lung cancer, etc. Being that tobacco is a highly addictive product these products fulfill the need and craving of nicotine without the side effects of cigarette smoking. These products are supported greatly in the fight to stop tobacco consumption and do not face any restrictions within the market, unlike tobacco. Furthermore, over these past few years increasing technology has affected the tobacco industry. Electronic cigarettes have begun replicating the oral fixation and craving that smoking gives to users. By satisfying this urge these electronic cigarettes have quickly become a very popular alternative within the market. There is an inverse relationship between their popularity and the usage of tobacco products. As the number of users of replacement products increases, tobacco usage then decreases.
Summarize the arguments in opposition of the ban on tobacco advertising in India. The fact that the product is still out there and available may
Should tobacco and alcohol advertising be allowed on television? The ban on advertising tobacco is already in affect, however, alcohol is another harmful substance. Should liquor be allowed to be advertised, if tobacco can not advertise their product? The ban on advertising tobacco products on television and radio, was passed through legislation in 1970 by Richard Nixon. This argument like others out there has two sides, one side in favor these advertisements and the other against these advertisements. Since both of these substances are highly addictive and costly. Would we like to see these advertisements continued? Are these advertisements the hazard they are communicated to be? Through the research of these two important sides, this essay will explore which side has a stronger stance on the topic.
Although it is beneficial for the economy for the production of tobacco products it is extremely risky to use the product. According to researchers second-hand smoke is terrible for everyone in the world who walk by someone who is exhaling. In the article by Robert Proctor “Why ban the sale of cigarettes? The case for abolition” he states that cigarettes are the “most deadl...
Arguments in favour of the ban on tobacco advertising in India are based on international precedents as other countries like France, Finland and Norway had already imposed similar bans. With regards to the constitutionality of the ban on advertising as violation of citizens ' private lives the argument was that the government had the right to intervene in then overall interest of the citizens and the need to protect public health just as drugs like cocaine had been banned the world over. Statistics on tobacco related deaths according to the World Health Organisation and the expected rise also counted in favour of the ban.
According to (Mackay, 2002), rapid increase in tobacco consumption and its spread around the world represent a great concern to public health both globally and at the national level. Tobacco is the second major cause of death in the world and the fourth most common risk factor for disease worldwide; it kills 4.9 million persons per year therefore it weighs heavily on the health care system of countries. Tobacco undermines the wellbeing of populations. The cost of treating tobacco-related illness is very high, not only in the governments but also to individuals and their families. In addition, the diseases and deaths that result from tobacco consumption impose great suffering and grief on the close family of the tobacco user, effects which are exacerbated by poverty.