The people who really didn’t care went about their business and didn’t offer much to the discussion. The ayes and the nays however had a back and forth argument concerning the bill. Each side brought unique viewpoints, facts, and specialists to counter the arguments from the opposing side.
The ayes brought the argument that smoking tobacco was unhealthy and that the Government of India was ethically responsible to prevent their citizens from partaking in something so dangerous. It was argued, that banning advertisements was part of an international trend started by European developed countries and court cases in Belgium and France supported this notion (icmrindia.org, 2010, Intro). The ayes also cited documents released during the 1990s concerning cigarette usage of the “smokers of tomorrow”, 14-25 year olds. The ayes also stressed the fact that while cigarettes brought in about 0.14 % of the G.D.P. the health costs associated with smoking accounted for 0.21% of G.D.P. Then, there is the argument that by reducing smoking the mon...
... middle of paper ...
... peers shall be formed at the time of the tax tabulation (taken from a national sample) to set forth rules and regulations concerning advertising specifics and in the event of a charge of violating the rules hereby laid out by the Government shall act as jurors.
• Sponsorship of sporting teams, events, cultural events shall be allowed as long as the events are not children specific.
In conclusion I think that the Indian Government was wrong to target cigarette manufactures and should have passed similar legalization for all nicotine containing products. While the nays have some strong points the only question I would ask would be if spending money on advertising geared towards children does not help you sell more products why are you against it. I would use children specific advertising laws so legal adults can still be informed of products on the market.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- Throughout life, we experience many conflicts of interest in ethical issues as all people have different understandings with different surroundings. There are many ethical issues for ban on tobacco advertising with the conflict of interest that pertained to government in India. In this essay, I will discuss about agreements and disagreements of the ban on tobacco advertising in India with the conflict of interest issues. Lastly, I will present my opinions on what India government should do. Advocates believed that tobacco advertising may affect public health and induce children and young people to begin experimenting with tobacco products.... [tags: Tobacco, Cigarette, Tobacco advertising, Nicotine]
1069 words (3.1 pages)
- 1. To discourage the young and old people from smoking and consuming tobacco products the government of India imposed a ban on all advertisements of tobacco products. One of the main reasons why cigarette advertising was banned in India was was due to the hazardous health issues arising from smoking tobacco. Tobacco was considered the most dangerous product consumed by humans. The website, http://www.icmrindia.org/free%20resources/casestudies/ban-tobacco-ads11.htm, states that, “According to world health organization tobacco accounted for over 3 million deaths in 1990, the figure rising to 4,023 million deaths in 1998, it was estimated that tobacco related deaths would rise to 8.... [tags: Tobacco advertising, Tobacco, Cigarette]
726 words (2.1 pages)
- Ban on Tobacco Advertisements in India In favor of tobacco advertising ban: Being responsible for the welfare of its citizens, the Government of India (GOI) sought better to ban tobacco companies from advertising their products. It’s beneficial to ban such advertising because of teen smoking prevention. By promoting tobacco less or not at all, the adolescents were presumed to use the products less until they they no longer used them in the long run. Tobacco advertisements were instigating tobacco use in the teen population.... [tags: Tobacco advertising, Tobacco, Nicotine]
722 words (2.1 pages)
- The Government of India sought to create a mechanism to ban Ads on Tobacco usage. In doing so, it raised ethical concerns and arguments from two different sides, those in favor of and against it. For instance, Suhel Seth, CEO of Equus Advertisement, made a strong differing statement such as “The ban does not have teeth. It is typical Knee-jerk reaction by any Government to create some kind of popularity for itself.” Mr. Seth thought the Government was not serious enough to endorse Tobacco Ads prohibition, but instead that the Government was using it to gain acceptance.... [tags: Tobacco advertising, Tobacco]
900 words (2.6 pages)
- Ban on Tobacco Ads by the Government of India An article titled: Ethics in Business was written between 1998 - 2001 and finally published in February 6, 2001. This article was written about a tobacco organization called India Tobacco Company (ITC) Philip Morris, found in India. 1. Arguments in favour of the ban on tobacco advertising in India Government, acting as the manager of the entire country has the responsibility to protect its citizens against any inappropriate behaviour. In 2001, India launches arguments in favour of the ban on tobacco advertising in the country.... [tags: Tobacco advertising, Tobacco]
746 words (2.1 pages)
- Summarize the arguments in favor of the ban on tobacco advertising in India Part of the ban on tobacco was based on the "need to protect public health". Cigarettes are not in the best interest of the public, on the contrary they provoke high risk in serious or lethal illness. Also, there was a difference of 0.07% between the contribution (to the G.D.P) of cigarettes and the costs related to health care. The objective of the banning tobacco advertisements was to invert these results so that the health care costs would be reduced in the G.D.P as cigarette sales would decrease at the same time.... [tags: Tobacco advertising, Tobacco, Nicotine]
919 words (2.6 pages)
- The Indian government 's ban on tobacco advertisement was a decision made through a utilitarian view. The GOI sought to make a decision that would result in the greatest good for the greatest number of people (here represented by health concerns) by implementing the ban. There has long been concern over the death toll caused by tobacco. Those in favor of the bill will point out “According to the World Health Organisation (WHO), tobacco accounted for over 3 million deaths in 1990, the figure rising to 4.023 million deaths in 1998.... [tags: Tobacco, Nicotine, Decision making, Health care]
1286 words (3.7 pages)
- The government of India has many arguments in favor of the ban on tobacco advertising. One of the arguments is the right of the government to step in and promote a healthier lifestyle. Many of the tobacco advertising companies stated that the ban on advertising was unconstitutional, but the supreme court in Belgium and France both agreed that the ban was not unconstitutional and was needed the ensure the public health. In 1990 tobacco attributed to over 3 million deaths and escalated to 4.023 million deaths in 1998.... [tags: Tobacco advertising, Tobacco, Nicotine]
885 words (2.5 pages)
- This case study summarize the argument in favor of the ban on tobacco advertising in Indian such as using animated camel, encouraging them to smoke, by damaging their health and enhancing the states expenditure, question where also raise about the economic impact, because the tobacco company contributed to the growth of the employment issue to 26 million people, so they argued that tobacco consumption and employment show policies are likely to reduce smoking and not decreased employment, because even if people stop smoking the money will be spend on other expenditures such as goods and services which were more labour intensive and produce more jobs.... [tags: Tobacco, Nicotine, Tobacco advertising]
813 words (2.3 pages)
- .Summarize the arguments in favor of the ban on tobacco advertising in India. After reading the case the main arguments in favor of the tobacco advertisement ban are the following: Regarding the legal aspect, the government has international precedents that support his decision of banning the tobacco advertisement: courts of Belgium and France have endorsed the decision of banning the advertisements saying that the ban wasn 't unconstitutional and it was looking for the protection of the citizens ' health.... [tags: Tobacco advertising, Tobacco, Advertising]
1162 words (3.3 pages)