Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Argument for tobacco advertising
Tobacco advertising should be restricted
Essays about tobacco advertisements
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Argument for tobacco advertising
Introduction:
Advertising is a tricky industry. It is possible to convince people on doing anything, no matter how harmful it is for themselves and their surroundings. Human nature contradicts with right and wrong in decision making, as there are no certainty to what is right and what is wrong. Most likely, it depends on one’s culture and perspective. In early 2001, Government of India announced a bill that would ban tobacco advertisements in the country.
This written assignment will focus on summarizing the points in favor as well as against the ban on tobacco advertising in India. Also there will be a discussion on the conflict of interest and my own opinion on what I expect from the Government pertaining to tobacco advertising as a responsible citizen.
Arguments in favor of the ban:
It is easy to argue in favor of things that will clearly improve the standard of living of ordinary citizens. Some notable arguments placed in favor of the ban are as follows:
1. Concerns related to public health: Smoking is injurious to health and advertising helps to promote this habit in young adults.
2. Increase in employment: Contrary to the popular belief, a study (SSA, 1997) showed that reduction in smoking leads to the circulation of money in more labor intensive sections of the society
3. Reduction in Consumption: World Bank (1999) report showed that there was a steep decrease in consumption with a ban on advertisement of tobacco products. There were also evidences that the demand for tobacco products eventually reduced with less advertisements.
Arguments opposing the ban:
As it is hard to think of arguing against a ban which would support better habits among kids, there were several of them in place. One good way to understand this is to l...
... middle of paper ...
...es of India article (2004), a WHO statement points out that “poor households spend 4 to 5 percent of their disposable income on tobacco products”. The money spent can definitely be better directed towards other needs. It is important to note that the advertising had a great impact on young adults and first time smokers. By inhibiting the urge at an early age will lead to the growth of a responsible society.
Works Cited
Roy, Bhaskar. Tobacco advertising ban from May1. Times of India. Feb15, 2004. Retrieved from the webpage on 5/7/2014 : http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Tobacco-advertising-ban-from-May-1/articleshow/497418.cms
SSA (Society for the Study of Addiction to Alcohol and Other Drugs), London, Press release, 20 November 1997.
World Bank Curbing the Epidemic: Governments and the Economics of Tobacco
Control, 1999 The World Bank, Washington D.C.
The tobacco industry seems like a beneficial addition to our economy. It has basically been a socially acceptable business in the past because it brings jobs to our people and tax money to the government to redistribute; but consider the cost of tobacco related treatment, mortality and disability- it exceeds the benefit to the producer by two hundred billion dollars US. (4) Tobacco is a very profitable industry determined to grow despite government loss or public health. Its history has demonstrated how money can blind morals like an addiction that is never satisfied. Past lawsuits were mostly unsuccessful because the juries blamed the smoker even though the definition of criminal negligence fits the industry’s acts perfectly. Some may argue for the industry in the name of free enterprise but since they have had such a clear understanding of the dangers of their product it changes the understanding of their business tactics and motives. The success of the industry has merely been a reflection of its immoral practices. These practices have been observed through its use of the media in regards to children, the tests that used underage smokers, the use of revenue to avoid the law, the use of nicotine manipulation and the suppression of research.
Without explicitly stating it, anti-smoking ads are based on the logical argument that smoking is bad for your health and quitting is in your best interest. Ever since it was discovered that smoking is linked to cancer and other illnesses, society’s view of smoking has changed. Now, smoking has a negative connotation. Smoking has switched from “smoking is cool and mature” to the equivalent of writing your suicide note. The reasonable argument is smoking is hazardous for your health and can lead to illnesses, such as cancer, which in turn leads to
Over the last 50 years, smoking and the public image of smoking has changed dramatically. Americans have learned the harmful effects of smoking and have put a heavy disdain on the use of it. The number of new smokers has drastically dropped over the years and many that had previously smoked have stopped. Some have turned to electronic cigarettes as a safer way to intake nicotine. Over the years, smoking advertisements have changed drastically. Nowadays, tobacco advertisements are virtually non-existent in our society, but when they were abundant they depicted smoking as a cool and sophisticated activity. Today, smoking advertisements are shown by electronic cigarette companies. These companies emphasize the healthier lifestyle these products
"Smoking Bans and the Tobacco Industry." Issues & Controversies. Facts On File News Services, 1 July 2013. Web. 4 Dec. 2013. .
There is clearly no way tobacco will never be outlawed but I believe there should be tighter restrictions on age limits throughout the world, and restrictions on the materials that are used in cigarette processing. Who is just letting cigarette companies continue to poison people and cause cancer risk? Throughout my essay I will analyze the affects of cigarette use on the society of the world and the elaborate corruption that keeps cigarette companies in business.
An estimated $44 billion is spent annually on tobacco in the United States. It has become such a big issue that the low income New Yorkers are spending nearly a quarter of their annual salary to feed their tobacco addiction. In addition, the aforementioned $44 billion do not include the health costs that tobacco inflicts upon its users. When compared to the $30 billion spent annually to solve world hunger, the American tobacco addiction exceeds the annual required cost by a whooping $14 billion. According to the study conducted by the WFP (World Food Programme), $3.2 billion would be needed per year to reach all the needs of 66 million hungry school-age children. All in all, people spend more on the tobacco industry when the funds could be used to solve a major world
Tobacco companies should be prevented from using advertising tactics that target teenagers. There has always been controversy as to how tobacco companies should prevent using advertising tactics to target teenagers. As controversial as this is tobacco companies shouldn’t advertise teen smoking. Many teens may be lured to believe cigarette advertising because it has been part of the American Culture for years, magazine ads and the media target young people, and these companies receive a drastic increase financially; however, the advertising by these cigarette companies has disadvantages such as having to campaign against their own company, limiting their cigarette advertising and becoming a controversial dilemma as to encouraging teenagers to smoke. From billboards to newspaper advertisements, cigarette promotions started becoming part of the American Culture.
The target audience of this advertisement is everyone who smokes. The advertisement aims to explain the health and financial consequences of smoking. There is a wide range of ages of those who smoke and this advertisement aims to deter them from smoking. It also targets those who don’t smoke by making them aware of the effects of smoking as
The purpose of the advertisement is to stop smoking.Here, the intended audience is parents, one who are
One way that the tobacco industry can be more ethical is changing their advertising strategy. I believe that today’s advertising strategy is very misleading about cigarettes. Examples of this unethical advertising is in Argentina, here 20 percent of television advertising is spent on smoking commercials, as well as in countries in and around Africa there are billboards that depict a man in a business suit stepping out of a black Mercedes as a chauffeur holds the door. This displays that cigarettes make people classy and sophisticated, making cigarettes look not only harmless but stylish. Another good example of unethical depiction on cigarettes is in Nigeria; here they promote a cigarette for graduates, with a picture of a university and a student in a cap and gown. As if this wasn’t a misleading visual they add a slogan that says, "A very important cigarette for very important people." These ads and slogan are ...
Although it is beneficial for the economy for the production of tobacco products it is extremely risky to use the product. According to researchers second-hand smoke is terrible for everyone in the world who walk by someone who is exhaling. In the article by Robert Proctor “Why ban the sale of cigarettes? The case for abolition” he states that cigarettes are the “most deadl...
Bell, K. (2013). Where there's smoke there's fire: Outdoor smoking bans and claims to public space. Contemporary Drug Problems, 40(1), 99-128.
Cigarette advertisements give the feeling that smokers are "bursting at the seams with joy" and that smoking is useful to you. Shockingly, nothing could be further from reality. The U.S. government has marked cigarettes as an unsafe medication that causes lung malignancy, coronary illness, and numerous different genuine sicknesses and conditions. Numerous individuals everywhere throughout the nation are discussing whether tobacco organizations ought to be permitted to publicize cigarettes or even to make cigarettes in today 's general public ("Analyzing Assorted Tobacco Advertisements").
Should tobacco and alcohol advertising be allowed on television? The ban on advertising tobacco is already in affect, however, alcohol is another harmful substance. Should liquor be allowed to be advertised, if tobacco can not advertise their product? The ban on advertising tobacco products on television and radio, was passed through legislation in 1970 by Richard Nixon. This argument like others out there has two sides, one side in favor these advertisements and the other against these advertisements. Since both of these substances are highly addictive and costly. Would we like to see these advertisements continued? Are these advertisements the hazard they are communicated to be? Through the research of these two important sides, this essay will explore which side has a stronger stance on the topic.
Big brands like Marlboro spend 70% of their profits on advertisements in 3rd world countries to try and get the people who do not know the consequences of smoking.In total tobacco companies spend over ten billion dollars on advertisement world wide. (who.int) The advertisement that is going on is on the covers are are cartoon animals and images that show if you smoke you will be